Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 35(4-5): 241-5, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17870609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An important question remains on how to obtain good quality of speech for patients needing maxillectomy. Oral and nasal spaces must be separated either by surgical means or by using an obturator-prosthesis. An objective measure of oronasal closure is nasalance. Different rehabilitative strategies should be compared. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 88 patients underwent maxillectomy of which 28 (32%) were available for examination. Ten patients had obturators (group l) and in 18 patients the maxilla was biologically reconstructed with different techniques (group 2). Sound pressure of nasal and oral airways were assessed seperately using a computerized sampling system (NasalView) and standardized German texts. Nasalance was calculated and compared with an uncompromised sample of patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between group 1 and group 2 concerning nasalance. Furthermore, the achieved values of nasalance were similar to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Nasalance after maxillectomy can be normal after sufficient rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Maxila/cirurgia , Obturadores Palatinos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Fala/fisiologia , Qualidade da Voz/fisiologia , Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transplante Ósseo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Maxilares/reabilitação , Neoplasias Maxilares/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Boca/fisiopatologia , Músculo Esquelético/transplante , Nariz/fisiopatologia , Fonética , Pressão , Transplante de Pele , Retalhos Cirúrgicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...