Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers faced unique challenges during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated rapid adaptation. Clinical event debriefings (CEDs) are one tool that teams can use to reflect after events and identify opportunities for improving their performance and their processes. There are few reports of how teams have used CEDs in the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim is to explore the issues discussed during COVID-19 CEDs and propose a framework model for qualitatively analyzing CEDs. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study of a hospital-wide CED program at a quaternary children's hospital between March and July 2020. CEDs were in-person, team-led, voluntary, scripted sessions using the Debriefing in Suspected COVID-19 to Encourage Reflection and Team Learning (DISCOVER-TooL). Debriefing content was qualitatively analyzed using constant comparative coding with an integrated deductive and inductive approach. A novel conceptual framework was proposed for understanding how debriefing content can be employed at various levels in a health system for learning and improvement. RESULTS: Thirty-one debriefings were performed and analyzed. Debriefings had a median of 7 debriefing participants, lasted a median of 10 min, and were associated with multiple systems-based process improvements. Fourteen themes and 25 subthemes were identified and categorized into a novel Input-Mediator-Output-Input Debriefing (IMOID) model. The most common themes included communication, coordination, situational awareness, team member roles, and clinical standards. CONCLUSIONS: Teams identified diverse issues in their debriefing discussions related to areas of high performance and opportunities for improvement in their care of COVID-19 patients. This model may help healthcare systems to understand how CED tools can be used to accelerate organizational learning to promote safety and improve outcomes in changing clinical environments.

Implementation of an Innovative, Multiunit, Postevent Debriefing Program in a Children's Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Postevent debriefing has been associated with improved resuscitation outcomes and is recommended by the American Heart Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics to improve clinical performance. OBJECTIVE: Despite the benefits of postevent debriefing, published debriefing programs have focused on single areas within a hospital. We are unaware of any hospital-wide debriefing programs implemented in a pediatric setting. METHODS: We established a multidisciplinary, interprofessional debriefing collaborative at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia to implement postevent debriefings in multiple areas of the hospital. The collaborative created a standardized debriefing form to capture data about the postevent debriefings. RESULTS: From July 23, 2015 to December 31, 2017, the emergency department performed 153 debriefings (18%) for 850 resuscitations. The neonatal intensive care unit conducted 10 debriefings (9%) for 107 resuscitations, and the pediatric intensive care unit performed 5 debriefings (7%) for 73 resuscitations. CONCLUSIONS: Several departments at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia have incorporated hot and cold debriefings into their clinical practice as part of their continuous quality improvement programs. By disseminating the tools and lessons learned from the implementation process, the collaborative hopes that other institutions will benefit from their lessons learned to successfully create their own debriefing programs. Widespread adoption of debriefing programs will enable a more scientific approach to studying the outcomes of debriefing.

Health cyberinfrastructure for collaborative use-inspired research and practice.

Rapid advances in information and networking technologies have greatly expanded the modes for conducting business and science. For the past two decades, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has been supporting efforts to develop a comprehensive cyberinfrastructure with the goal of transforming the nature of scientific investigations. More recently, the NIH began supporting efforts to develop a cyberinfrastructure of healthcare research and practice. However, the best structure and applications of cyberinfrastructure in health care have yet to be defined. To address these issues, the NIH and the Kay Center for E-Health Research at Claremont Graduate University sponsored a symposium on "Cyberinfrastructure for Public Health and Health Services: Research and Funding Directions." The symposium convened researchers, practitioners, and federal funders to discuss how to further cyberinfrastructure systems and research in the public health and health services sectors. This paper synthesizes findings of the symposium, the goals of which were to determine the dynamics necessary for executing and utilizing cyberinfrastructure in public health and health services; examine the requirements of transdisciplinary collaboration; and identify future research directions. A multi-faceted conception of use-inspired research for cyberinfrastructure is developed. Use-inspired research aims to further basic theory but is grounded, inspired, and informed by practical problems. A cyberinfrastructure framework is presented that incorporates three intersecting dimensions: research-practice, health services-public health, and social-technical dimensions. Within this framework, this paper discusses the ways in which cyberinfrastructure provides opportunities to integrate across these dimensions to develop research and actions that can improve both clinical outcomes and public health.

HealthATM: personal health cyberinfrastructure for underserved populations.

BACKGROUND: There is an opportunity for personal health record (PHR) systems to play a vital role in fostering health self-management within underserved populations. If properly designed and promoted, it is possible that patients will use PHRs to become more empowered in taking an active role toward managing their health needs. PURPOSE: This research examines the potential of a cyberinfrastructure-based PHR to encourage patient activation in health care, while also having population health implications. METHODS: A multi-phased, iterative research approach was used to design and evaluate a PHR system called HealthATM, which utilizes services from a cloud computing environment. These services were integrated into an ATM-style interface aimed at providing a broad range of health consumers with the ability to manage health conditions and encourage accomplishment of health goals. RESULTS: Evaluation of the PHR included 115 patients who were clients of several free clinics in Los Angeles County. The majority of patients perceived ease of use (74%) and confidence (73%) in using the HealthATM system, and thought they would like to use it frequently (73%). Patients also indicated a belief in being responsible for their own health. However, fewer felt as though they were able to maintain necessary life changes to improve their health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the field tests suggest that PHRs can be a beneficial health management tool for underserved populations. In order for these types of tools to be effective within safety-net communities, they must be technically accessible and provide meaningful opportunities to increase patient engagement in their health care.

Collaboration in electronic medical evidence development: a case study of the Social Security Administration's MEGAHIT System.

BACKGROUND: In January 2009, the Social Security Administration (SSA) began a collaboration with MedVirginia to send authorized requests for and receipts of patient health information using the Medical Evidence Gathering and Analysis through Health IT (MEGAHIT) application. This request and receipt used the Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN) for secure and interoperable Health IT standards-based transport of patient information. METHODS: This case study, conducted from June to November 2009, represents the first production exchange of health information across the NwHIN. Interviews with 43 participants from a variety of organizations are reported across technical, organizational, and governance dimensions in terms of challenges, successes, and considerations for moving forward. RESULTS: This case study reports on the technical, organizational, and governance dimensions of collaboration. In terms of technical success, the authorized medical evidence request and receipt took approximately 2 min, including Continuity of Care Document (CCD) rendering. Overall, this resulted in mean case-processing time savings of 30%. Organizationally, the production effort required collaboration among multiple stakeholders: SSA sought claimant health information, MedVirginia provided patient health information, and other parties, such as the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC), facilitated transport of patient information across the NwHIN. According to those involved, this limited production effort tolerated and even benefited from an ad hoc multiparty governance structure. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-party collaboration can result in technical success, but achieving that success is dependent on a variety of organizational factors. This case study highlights the significance of and potential for requesting and receiving patient health information across the NwHIN. It will inform interested collaborating stakeholders as SSA engages additional providers in using MEGAHIT to collect health information via the NwHIN.

Personal health records: Consumer attitudes toward privacy and security of their personal health information.

Personal health record (PHR) systems are a subject of intense interest in the move to improve healthcare accessibility and quality. Although a number of vendors continue to put forward PHR systems, user-centered design research has lagged, and it has not been clear what features are important to prospective PHR users. Here, we report on a user-centered design study that combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to investigate several dimensions relevant to PHR design, and to look at the effect of health status on user needs. The results indicate that health status, especially disability and chronic illness, is relevant to PHR design. Further, the results provide empirical evidence about the role of privacy and security in users' attitudes toward PHR use. The exact nature of these attitudes differs from widely held perceptions about consumer values in healthcare information management.

Fatores de risco de complicações pulmonares em pacientes com sarcoma após toracotomia para a ressecção de nódulos pulmonares / Risk factors for pulmonary complications in patients with sarcoma after the resection of pulmonary nodules by thoracotomy

OBJETIVO: Identificar os fatores de risco para complicações pulmonares em pacientes com sarcoma após serem submetidos a toracotomia para a ressecção de nódulos pulmonares. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo com 68 pacientes consecutivos com diagnóstico de sarcomas e submetidos a 174 toracotomias para a ressecção de nódulos pulmonares. A variável dependente foi definida como a ocorrência de qualquer complicação pulmonar pós-operatória. As variáveis independentes foram relacionadas com o paciente, o diagnóstico de base e o tipo de procedimento cirúrgico. Os dados foram analisados segundo um modelo multivariado de estimação de equações generalizadas, com uma função de ligação logística e uma estrutura de correlação simétrica. RESULTADOS: Houve 24 complicações (13,8 por cento; IC95 por cento: 9,0-19,8), incluindo um óbito. Os pacientes que apresentaram complicações pós-operatórias tiveram um tempo médio de internação duas vezes superior àqueles sem complicações (18,8 ± 10,0 dias vs. 8,6 ± 6,0 dias; p < 0,05). As variáveis que se correlacionaram com o desfecho foram o tipo de ressecção (em cunha ou anatômica; OR = 3,6; IC95 por cento: 1,5-8,8), necessidade de transfusão sanguínea (OR = 9,8; IC95 por cento: 1,6-60,1) e número de nódulos ressecados (OR = 1,1; IC95 por cento: 1,0-1,1). O modelo multivariado obtido exibiu uma área sob a curva ROC de 0,75 (IC95 por cento: 0,65-0,85). CONCLUSÕES: As complicações pulmonares pós-operatórias após a ressecção de nódulos pulmonares em pacientes com sarcoma não foram raras, ocorrendo em cerca de 10 por cento dos procedimentos. A ocorrência dessas complicações pode ser antecipada pelo uso de ressecção não em cunha, necessidade de hemotransfusão e maior número de nódulos ressecados. Assim, já no pós-operatório imediato, é possível identificar pacientes de risco, que devem ser estritamente monitorizados durante o período pós-operatório imediato. Para esses pacientes, todas as medidas preventivas devem ser tomadas.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for pulmonary complications after thoracotomy for the resection of pulmonary nodules in patients with sarcoma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 68 consecutive patients diagnosed with sarcoma and submitted to a total of 174 thoracotomies for the resection of pulmonary nodules. The dependent variable was defined as the occurrence of any postoperative pulmonary complications. The independent variables were related to the patient, underlying diagnosis, and type of surgical procedure. We analyzed the data using a multivariate generalized estimating equations model with logistic link function and a symmetric correlation structure. RESULTS: Complications were observed in 24 patients (13.8 percent, 95 percent CI: 9.0-19.8), and there was one death. The mean length of hospital stay was twice as long in the patients with postoperative complications as in those without (18.8 ± 10.0 days vs. 8.6 ± 6.0 days; p < 0.05). The variables that correlated with the outcome measure were the type of resection (wedge vs. anatomic; OR = 3.6; 95 percent CI: 1.5-8.8), the need for blood transfusion (OR = 9.8; 95 percent CI: 1.6-60.1), and the number of nodules resected (OR = 1.1; 95 percent CI: 1.0-1.1). The multivariate model showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.75 (95 percent CI: 0.65-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pulmonary complications were common after pulmonary nodule resection in patients with sarcoma, occurring in approximately 10 percent of the procedures. The occurrence of such complications can be expected when techniques other than wedge resection are employed, when blood transfusion is required, and when a great number of nodules are resected. Therefore, it is possible to identify patients at risk for pulmonary complications, who should be closely monitored in the immediate postoperative period. In such patients, all preventive measures should be taken.

A multidimensional view of personal health systems for underserved populations.

The advent of electronic personal health records (PHR) provides a major opportunity to encourage positive health management practices, such as chronic disease management. Yet, to date there has been little attention toward the use of PHRs where advanced health information services are perhaps most needed, namely, in underserved communities. Drawing upon research conducted with safety net providers and patients, the authors propose a multi-level analytical framework for guiding actions aimed at fostering PHR adoption and utilization. The authors first outline distinctive user and technical requirements that need to be considered. Next, they assess organizational requirements necessary to implement PHRs within health systems bound by limited resources. Finally, the authors analyze the overriding health care policy context that can facilitate or thwart such efforts. The conclusion notes that heightened national attention toward health information technology and reform provides a significant opportunity for initiatives whose goal is to increase widepread access to PHRs.

Rural veteran access to healthcare services: investigating the role of information and communication technologies in overcoming spatial barriers.

This multimethod pilot study examined patient and practitioner perspectives on the influence of spatial barriers to healthcare access and the role of health information technology in overcoming these barriers. The study included a survey administered to patients attending a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health visit, and a focus group with VA care providers. Descriptive results and focus group findings are presented. Spatial distance is a significant factor for many rural veterans when seeking healthcare. For this sample of rural veterans, a range of telephone, computer, and Internet technologies may become more important for accessing care as Internet access becomes more ubiquitous and as younger veterans begin using the VA health system. The focus group highlighted the negative impact of distance, economic considerations, geographic barriers, and specific medical conditions on access to care. Lack of adequate technology infrastructure was seen as an obstacle to utilization. This study discusses the need to consider distance, travel modes, age, and information technology infrastructure and adoption when designing health information technology to care for rural patients.

Risk factors for pulmonary complications in patients with sarcoma after the resection of pulmonary nodules by thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for pulmonary complications after thoracotomy for the resection of pulmonary nodules in patients with sarcoma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 68 consecutive patients diagnosed with sarcoma and submitted to a total of 174 thoracotomies for the resection of pulmonary nodules. The dependent variable was defined as the occurrence of any postoperative pulmonary complications. The independent variables were related to the patient, underlying diagnosis, and type of surgical procedure. We analyzed the data using a multivariate generalized estimating equations model with logistic link function and a symmetric correlation structure. RESULTS: Complications were observed in 24 patients (13.8%, 95% CI: 9.0-19.8), and there was one death. The mean length of hospital stay was twice as long in the patients with postoperative complications as in those without (18.8 ± 10.0 days vs. 8.6 ± 6.0 days; p < 0.05). The variables that correlated with the outcome measure were the type of resection (wedge vs. anatomic; OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.5-8.8), the need for blood transfusion (OR = 9.8; 95% CI: 1.6-60.1), and the number of nodules resected (OR = 1.1; 95% CI: 1.0-1.1). The multivariate model showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pulmonary complications were common after pulmonary nodule resection in patients with sarcoma, occurring in approximately 10% of the procedures. The occurrence of such complications can be expected when techniques other than wedge resection are employed, when blood transfusion is required, and when a great number of nodules are resected. Therefore, it is possible to identify patients at risk for pulmonary complications, who should be closely monitored in the immediate postoperative period. In such patients, all preventive measures should be taken.

Noninvasive determination of inspiratory pressure in patients with spinal cord injury: what is the best method?

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) and MIP in individuals with spinal cord injury. We evaluated 26 patients with spinal cord injury. Mean FVC in those with tetraplegia was 52 +/- 19% of predicted, compared with 78 +/- 23% of predicted in those with paraplegia (p < 0.05). In contrast, the percentage of predicted SNIP was lower in those with tetraplegia than in those with paraplegia (p < 0.05). In all participants, SNIP correlated significantly with the level of the injury (r = 0.489; 95% CI: 0.125-0.737). The impact that the greater discriminatory power of SNIP has on the diagnosis of impaired pulmonary function in spinal cord-injured patients should be investigated further.

Noninvasive determination of inspiratory pressure in patients with spinal cord injury: what is the best method? / Determinação não-invasiva da pressão inspiratória em pacientes com lesão medular traumática: qual é o melhor método?

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) and MIP in individuals with spinal cord injury. We evaluated 26 patients with spinal cord injury. Mean FVC in those with tetraplegia was 52 ± 19 percent of predicted, compared with 78 ± 23 percent of predicted in those with paraplegia (p < 0.05). In contrast, the percentage of predicted SNIP was lower in those with tetraplegia than in those with paraplegia (p < 0.05). In all participants, SNIP correlated significantly with the level of the injury (r = 0.489; 95 percent CI: 0.125-0.737). The impact that the greater discriminatory power of SNIP has on the diagnosis of impaired pulmonary function in spinal cord-injured patients should be investigated further.

O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar o desempenho da pressão inspiratória nasal durante o fungar (PInas) e da PImáx em indivíduos com lesão medular traumática. Foram avaliados 26 pacientes com lesão medular traumática. Os pacientes tetraplégicos e paraplégicos exibiram diferentes médias do percentual do previsto da CVF, respectivamente, 52 ± 19 por cento e 78 ± 23 por cento (p < 0,05). Ao contrário da PImáx, o percentual do previsto médio da PInas foi inferior nos tetraplégicos (p < 0,05) e, em todos os participantes, a correlação com o nível da lesão foi significativa (r = 0,489; IC95 por cento: 0,125-0,737). O impacto do melhor discernimento da PInas no diagnóstico das alterações da função inspiratória de pacientes com lesão medular traumática merece ser aprofundado.

The electronic disability record: purpose, parameters, and model use case.

The active engagement of consumers is an important factor in achieving widespread success of health information systems. The disability community represents a major segment of the healthcare arena, with more than 50 million Americans experiencing some form of disability. In keeping with the "consumer-driven" approach to e-health systems, this paper considers the distinctive aspects of electronic and personal health record use by this segment of society. Drawing upon the information shared during two national policy forums on this topic, the authors present the concept of Electronic Disability Records (EDR). The authors outline the purpose and parameters of such records, with specific attention to its ability to organize health and financial data in a manner that can be used to expedite the disability determination process. In doing so, the authors discuss its interaction with Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Personal Health Records (PHR). The authors then draw upon these general parameters to outline a model use case for disability determination and discuss related implications for disability health management. The paper further reports on the subsequent considerations of these and related deliberations by the American Health Information Community (AHIC).

The prospective role of personal health records in streamlining and accelerating the disability determination process.

BACKGROUND: The disability community could benefit significantly from the widespread adoption of health information technology, in particular from its ability to streamline and accelerate processing of the estimated 3 million disability benefits applications filed with the Social Security Administration each year. Disability determination is an inefficient, largely paper-based process requiring large volumes of clinical data compiled from multiple provider sources. That, coupled with a lack of transparency within the process, adds unnecessary delays and expense. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to outline the case for how personal health records, particularly those populated with information from provider-held electronic health records and payer claims data, offer a means to achieve financial savings from shortened disability determination processes, as well as a tool for disability health self-management and care coordination. METHODS: Drawing from research and policy forums and testimony before the American Health Information Community, the importance of including the disability community as the nation moves forward with health information technology initiatives is explored. RESULTS: Our research suggests that systemwide improvements such as the Nationwide Health Information Network and other such health information technology initiatives could be used to bring benefits to the disability community. CONCLUSIONS: The time has come to use health information technology initiatives so that federal policy makers can takes steps to reduce the inefficiencies in the Social Security Administration disability determination process while improving the program's value to those who need it the most.

Role of Health Information Technology (HIT) in disability determinations: when medical records become medical evidence.

This exploratory study investigated the impact of incomplete medical evidence on the SSA disability determination process and the role of HIT as a solution. We collected qualitative data from nineteen expert-interviews. Findings indicate that HIT can lead to innovative solutions that can significantly improve the determination process.

Health Status and Prospective PHR Use.

This poster reports a study that combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to investigate the effect of health status on user needs in Personal Health Records applications. Results show distinct user differences according to health status and that being well, unwell, or disabled will have an influence on users needs in relation to a PHR. In this taxonomy, users are classified according to technology preferences, interoperability and portability needs, and privacy and security concerns.

Electronic personal health records and systems to improve care for vulnerable populations.

The efforts of this research are to educate patients within vulnerable populations in the use of electronic personal health records so they may better monitor their health, attain desired health goals and manage their health services. Evaluation measures will include facets of self-management of health, patient-physician communication, and assessment of accessibility and usability factors of the personal health record.

CSMD1 is a novel multiple domain complement-regulatory protein highly expressed in the central nervous system and epithelial tissues.

In this study, we describe the identification and in vitro functional activity of a novel multiple domain complement regulatory protein discovered based on its homology to short consensus repeat (SCR)-containing proteins of the regulators of complement activation (RCA) gene family. The rat cDNA encodes a predicted 388-kDa protein consisting of 14 N-terminal CUB domains that are separated from each other by a SCR followed by 15 tandem SCR domains, a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic tail. This protein is the homolog of the human protein of unknown function called the CUB and sushi multiple domains 1 (CSMD1) protein. A cloning strategy that incorporates the two C-terminal CUB-SCR domains and 12 of the tandem SCR repeats was used to produce a soluble rat CSMD1 protein. This protein blocked classical complement pathway activation in a comparable fashion with rat Crry but did not block alternative pathway activation. Analysis of CSMD1 mRNA expression by in situ hybridization and immunolabeling of neurons indicates that the primary sites of synthesis are the developing CNS and epithelial tissues. Of particular significance is the enrichment of CSMD1 in the nerve growth cone, the amoeboid-leading edge of the growing neuron. These results suggest that CSMD1 may be an important regulator of complement activation and inflammation in the developing CNS, and that it may also play a role in the context of growth cone function.