Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0194864, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29641582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypoactive lifestyle contributes to the development of secondary complications and lower quality of life in wheelchair users. There is a need for objective and user-friendly physical activity monitors for wheelchair-dependent individuals in order to increase physical activity through self-monitoring, goal setting, and feedback provision. OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of Activ8 Activity Monitors to 1) distinguish two classes of activities: independent wheelchair propulsion from other non-propulsive wheelchair-related activities 2) distinguish five wheelchair-related classes of activities differing by the movement intensity level: sitting in a wheelchair (hands may be moving but wheelchair remains stationary), maneuvering, and normal, high speed or assisted wheelchair propulsion. METHODS: Sixteen able-bodied individuals performed sixteen various standardized 60s-activities of daily living. Each participant was equipped with a set of two Activ8 Professional Activity Monitors, one at the right forearm and one at the right wheel. Task classification by the Active8 Monitors was validated using video recordings. For the overall agreement, sensitivity and positive predictive value, outcomes above 90% are considered excellent, between 70 and 90% good, and below 70% unsatisfactory. RESULTS: Division in two classes resulted in overall agreement of 82.1%, sensitivity of 77.7% and positive predictive value of 78.2%. 84.5% of total duration of all tasks was classified identically by Activ8 and based on the video material. Division in five classes resulted in overall agreement of 56.6%, sensitivity of 52.8% and positive predictive value of 51.9%. 59.8% of total duration of all tasks was classified identically by Activ8 and based on the video material. CONCLUSIONS: Activ8 system proved to be suitable for distinguishing between active wheelchair propulsion and other non-propulsive wheelchair-related activities. The ability of the current system and algorithms to distinguish five various wheelchair-related activities is unsatisfactory.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Desenho de Equipamento , Monitorização Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Monitorização Ambulatorial/métodos , Cadeiras de Rodas , Idoso , Algoritmos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Pessoas com Deficiência , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Mãos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Software , Gravação em Vídeo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...