Restrictive points of entry into abortion care in Ireland: a qualitative study of expectations and experiences with the service.

This article focuses on access to early medical abortion care under Section 12 of the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018, in Ireland and identifies existing barriers resulting from gaps in current policy design. The article draws primarily on qualitative interviews with 24 service users, 20 primary healthcare providers in the community and 27 key informants, including from grassroots groups that work with women from different migrant communities, to examine service users' experiences accessing early medical abortions on request up to 12 weeks gestation. The interviews were part of a wider mixed-methods study from 2020-2021 examining the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of abortion policy in Ireland. Our findings highlight care seekers' experiences with the GP-led service provision, including delays, facing non-providers, the mandatory three-day waiting period, and oversubscribed women's health and family planning clinics. Our findings also highlight the compounding challenges for migrants and additional barriers posed by the geographical distribution of the service and the 12-week gestational limit. Finally, it focuses on the remaining challenges for racialised and other marginalised groups. In order to provide a "thick description" of women's lives and the complexity of their experiences with abortion services in Ireland, we also present two narrative vignettes of service users, and their experiences with delays and navigating the healthcare system as migrants. To this effect, this article applies a reproductive justice framework to the results to highlight the compounding effects of these barriers on people located along multiple axes of social inequality.

Information flow as reproductive governance. Patient journey analysis of information barriers and facilitators to abortion care in the republic of Ireland.

Background: Information flow - information communication and transmission pathways and practices within healthcare systems - impacts patient journeys. Historically, regulating information flow was a key technology of reproductive governance in the Republic of Ireland. Pre-2018, law and the State sustained informational barriers to and through abortion care in Ireland. An expanded abortion service was implemented in January 2019. Method: Patient Journey Analysis (PJA) interrogates informational facilitators and barriers to/through post-2019 abortion care in Ireland. We focus on information flow at the interfaces between the 'public' sphere and 'point of entry', 'point of entry' and primary care, and primary and secondary care. Materials: The paper uses data from a mixed-method study. A tool for assessing online abortion service information (ASIAT), desktop research, and qualitative data from 108 in-depth interviews with providers, policy-makers, advocacy groups, and service users informed the analysis. Results: Abortion patient journeys vary. Information flow issues, e.g. communication of how to access services, referral systems, and information handover, act as barriers and facilitators. Barriers increase where movement from primary to secondary is needed. Applications: The article identifies good practice in information flow strategy, as well as areas for development. It illustrates the significance of information flow in accomplishing reproductive governance.

Abortion policy implementation in Ireland: Lessons from the community model of care.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the right to lawful abortion in the Republic of Ireland significantly expanded, and service provision commenced on 1 January, 2019. Community provision of early medical abortion to 9 weeks plus 6 days gestation delivered by General Practitioners constitutes the backbone of the Irish abortion policy implementation. We conducted a study in 2020-2021 to examine the barriers and facilitators of the Irish abortion policy implementation. METHODS: We collected data using qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) which were conducted in-person or remotely. We coded and analysed interview transcripts following the grounded theory approach. RESULTS: We collected 108 IDIs in Ireland from May 2020 to March 2021. This article draws on 79 IDIs with three participant samples directly relevant to the community model of care: (a) 27 key informants involved in the abortion policy development and implementation representing government healthcare administration, medical professionals, and advocacy organisations, (b) 22 healthcare providers involved in abortion provision in community settings, and (c) 30 service users who sought abortion services in 2020. Facilitators of community-based abortion provision have been: a collaborative approach between the Irish government and the medical community to develop the model of care, and strong support systems for providers. The MyOptions helpline for service users is a successful national referral model. The main barriers to provision are the mandatory 3-day wait, unclear or slow referral pathways from primary to hospital care, barriers for migrants, and a shortage and incomplete geographic distribution of providers, especially in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that access to abortion care in Ireland has been greatly expanded since the policy implementation in 2019. The community delivery of care and the national helpline constitute key features of the Irish abortion policy implementation that could be duplicated in other contexts and countries. Several challenges to full abortion policy implementation remain.

Termination of pregnancy services in Irish general practice from January 2019 to June 2019.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how a general-practitioner-delivered community medical abortion service is provided in Ireland, including a description of the unique model of care delivered within the framework of new legislation. To investigate the characteristics and contraceptive choices of women attending in the first six months of the service. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-seven general practitioners conducted a retrospective chart review. We described the service and analyzed demographic characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and contraception use. We defined treatment success as complete abortion without surgical intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-seven general practitioners from the Southern Task Group on Abortion and Reproductive Topics (START) group collected data from 475 women who had attended requesting medical abortion from January 1st 2019 to June 30th 2019. Out of these, 315 (66%) were more than 25 years old, and 261 (55%) had at least one child. The mean gestational age at initial presentation was 49 days. Five (1%) had a gestational age which exceeded 84 days. Four hundred and twenty (89%) proceeded with community medical abortion following an initial consultation. The process was completed without the need for surgical intervention in 412 (98%) cases. Six (1.4%) women had a mild post-treatment infection, and received community treatment with oral antibiotics. Thirty-three (7.9%) patients were referred to hospital for additional evaluation following treatment. Two hundred ninety (69%) adopted contraception post abortion; only 160 (34%) were using contraception prior to pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The general-practitioner-delivered community medical abortion service described in the study is safe, effective, and accessible for the majority of, but not all women seeking abortion. The model of care used in Ireland provides an ideal opportunity to discuss contraceptive choice. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This review provides demographic, efficacy, and safety data for the general-practitioner-provided community medical abortion service in Ireland. An effective and largely accessible model of care is demonstrated. These findings can help inform legislative review, clinical guidelines, and generate hypotheses for future research.