[A case of Evans syndrome in a long-term hemodialysis patient].

A 75-year-old woman, who had been on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) from 2000, was receiving erythro- poiesis stimulating agent (ESA) for renal anemia. In November 2013, although still continuing ESA, she was admitted to our hospital due to worsening anemia. Since blood tests suggested the possibility of hemolytic anemia, we consulted,with hematologists, and she was transferred to another hospital. Differential diagnosis for anemia revealed that she had newly developed Evans syndrome, which is the complication of autoimmune hemolytic ane- mia (AIHA) and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura(ITP). She was successfully treated for AIHA with blood transfusion and administration of steroids, and for ITP by eradicating Melicobacter pylort. Anemia is commonly seen in HD patients, and the majority of anemia cases are diagnosed as renal anemia; however, hemolytic anemia should be considered in order to make a differential diagnosis. There are few reports of Evans syndrome in HD, and the pathogenesis of Evans syndrome is largely unknown. Further accumulation of clinical reports is needed to clarify its etiology.

Alterations of plant sterols, lathosterol, oxidative stress and inflammatory markers after the combination therapy of ezetimibe and statin drugs in type 2 diabetic patients.

UNLABELLED: The elevation of serum plant sterols in addition to serum LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the important risk factors for coronary heart disease. We investigated how to alterations of serum hepatic synthesised cholesterol and plant sterols levels, clinical markers for inflammation and oxidative stress after combination therapy with ezetimibe, an inhibitor of cholesterol transporter in the small intestinal colon, and statin drugs in type 2 diabetic patients. Studies were conducted in 28 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with dyslipidemia. Patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: the 1st group is 7 patients treated with 10mg ezetimibe sequent on pretreatment with mild statin drug (MS+E group), and the 2nd group is 7 patients treated with 10mg ezetimibe sequent on pretreatment with strong statin drug (SS+E group), and then the 3rd group is 14 patients treated with 10mg ezetimibe alone without pretreatment with any statin drugs (naïve E group). In addition to various metabolic markers, serum plant sterols such as sitosterol and campesterol, and hepatic synthesised cholesterol such as lathosterol were measured by the gas liquid chromatography. Serum highly sensitive CRP (hsCRP) as an inflammation marker, and then malonyldealdehyde (MDA) and carbonyl-modified protein (CMP) as an oxidative stress were assayed by the conventional method, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose and serum glucosylated HbA1c (JDS value) did not show any significant changes after administration of ezetimibe in whole groups. Serum LDL-C was reduced significantly and serum triglyceride exhibited a tendency of reduction in whole groups. Serum sitosterol and campesterol were decreased significantly, while serum lathosterol was increased significantly or markedly in whole patients and also in each group. There were no significant changes in serum hsCRP in whole groups. Both serum MDA and CMP revealed significant or marked reductions in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The present investigation suggests that the combination therapy of the ezetimibe and statin drugs is potential to remarkably reduce serum LDL-C, plant sterols, MDA and CMP, and therefore might lead to prevent atherosclerosis.

Effect of combination therapy with alogliptin and lansoprazole on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The main purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of a combination of alogliptin [a dipeptydil peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor] and lansoprazole [a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)] compared with alogliptin mono-therapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study was a multicenter randomized open-label study. One hundred type 2 diabetic patients were randomly assigned to either the alogliptin with lansoprazole group or the alogliptin mono-therapy group. After 3 months of treatment, the changes in hemoglobin (Hb)A1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum gastrin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-ß, and HOMA-insulin resistance (IR) were evaluated. A significant decrease in HbA1c and FPG, and a significant increase in HOMA-ß were observed in both groups (all with P <0.0001). However, there were no significant differences in changes in HbA1c, FPG, or HOMA-ß before and after therapy between the combination and alogliptin mono-therapy group (P =0.2945, P =0.1901, P =0.3042, respectively). There was a significant elevation of serum gastrin in the combination group compared with the alogliptin mono-therapy group (P =0.0004). This study showed that, although combination therapy with alogliptin and lansoprazole more effectively elevated serum gastrin levels compared with alogliptin mono-therapy, the effect of the combination therapy on glycemic control was equal to that of alogliptin mono-therapy during a 3-month study period.