Exacerbation of acidosis during ischemia and reperfusion arrhythmia in hearts from type 2 Diabetic Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to ischemia and its underlying mechanisms in type 2 diabetic hearts are still largely unknown. Especially, correlation between reperfusion induced ventricular arrhythmia and changes in intracellular pH has not been elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats at 16 and 32 weeks of age were used along with age-matched nondiabetic Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats. Hearts from rats in these 4 groups were perfused in the working heart mode, thus inducing whole heart ischemia. At 16 weeks of age, no differences in blood glucose levels or incidence and duration of reperfusion arrhythmia were found between the strains. At 32 weeks of age, both impaired glucose tolerance and obesity were observed in the OLETF rats. Further, the duration of reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) was significantly longer in the OLETF rats, while the pH level was significantly lower and proton contents were significantly higher in coronary effluent during ischemia in those rats. Following treatment with troglitazone, improvements in pH and proton level in coronary effluent during ischemia were observed, as was the duration of reperfusion-induced VF in OLETF rats at 32 weeks of age. CONCLUSION: The hearts of spontaneously diabetic OLETF rats were found to be more susceptible to ischemic insult. Troglitazone treatment improved ischemic tolerance by improving glucose metabolism in the myocardium of those rats.

Cardioprotective action of perindopril versus candesartan in renovascular hypertensive rats.

We investigated the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on cardiac hypertrophy in rats with renovascular hypertension. Renovascular hypertensive (Goldblatt) rats were surgically prepared from Wistar rats. Four weeks later, the rats showed a significant increase in blood pressure. At high doses, both the perindopril (1 mg/kg/day) and the candesartan (2 mg/kg/day) decreased the systolic pressure in these rats to the level of control Wistar rats. At low doses (perindopril 0.1 mg/kg/day and candesartan 0.1 mg/kg/day), these drugs lowered blood pressure to 85% of that in hypertensive rats. Echocardiographic and morphological studies revealed severe cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in untreated Goldblatt rats. High-dose treatment with both drugs suppressed the progression of hypertrophy and fibrosis. Also, low-dose perindopril prevented cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. In contrast, at the same levels of blood-pressure reduction, low-dose candesartan did not prevent cardiac fibrosis nor the upregulation of cardiac collagen types I and III mRNA observed in untreated Goldblatt rats. Atrial natriuretic peptide mRNA was up-regulated in untreated Goldblatt rats. These changes were significantly decreased by both doses of perindopril or the high dose of candesartan. Serum levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone were significantly higher in untreated Goldblatt rats. Both doses of perindopril inhibited activation of the renin-angiotensin system, whereas candesartan had weaker effects. In particular, serum aldosterone was 347 +/- 20 pg/ml in low-dose perindopril versus 1796 +/- 324 pg/ml in low-dose candesartan. These results suggest that there were no differences between the cardioprotective actions of perindopril and candesartan at high dosages. On the other hand, low-dose treatment with perindopril was more effective in preventing cardiac fibrosis than was low-dose treatment with candesartan, despite similar changes in blood pressure. It is possible that changes in aldosterone secretion are related to this difference.