Sniff and reverse-sniff nasal respiratory pressures after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A single-center prospective study.

BACKGROUND: and objective: This study examined the validity of sniff nasal inspiratory (SNIP) and reverse-sniff nasal expiratory pressures (RSNEP) for estimating respiratory muscle strength and for predicting poor life expectancy following exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This prospective study included patients who were admitted for COPD exacerbation and underwent rehabilitation. At hospital discharge, SNIP, RSNEP, and maximum mouth inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) were measured, and the body mass index, degree of airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index was calculated by evaluating body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, and 6-min walk distance. RESULTS: Data from 43 patients (mean age 76.8 years, FEV1 42.8 % predicted) were analyzed. SNIP and RSNEP were moderately correlated with MIP and MEP, respectively. Bland-Altman plot means of SNIP (48.3 ± 17.5) and RSNEP (44.7 ± 23.8 cmH2O) were lower than those of MIP (54.8 ± 19.9) and MEP (76.4 ± 31.2 cmH2O), respectively, and the SNIP-MIP and RSNEP-MEP 95 % limits of agreement were wide. Logistic regression showed that SNIP and RSNEP were significantly associated with BODE score ≥7 (poor life expectancy), and predictive accuracy was 81.4 % when combining SNIP ≤49 and RSNEP ≤42 cmH2O. CONCLUSION: After exacerbation in patients with COPD, SNIP and RSNEP are useful indicators that complement MIP and MEP. Furthermore, a combined SNIP and RSNEP test may be beneficial in predicting poor life expectancy.

Recovery of respiratory muscle strength, physical function, and dyspnoea after lobectomy in lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise changes in respiratory muscle strength, physical function, and dyspnoea in patients who underwent pre- and post-operative exercise intervention following lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This retrospective study included NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT) and pre- and post-operative exercise intervention consisting of breathing, flexibility, resistance, aerobic exercises, coughing/huffing techniques, and early mobilisation. Maximum mouth inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory pressures (Pemax), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), quadriceps force (QF), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale were evaluated preoperatively, at hospital discharge, and post-lobectomy 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: Data from 41 patients were analysed. At hospital discharge, the Pimax, Pemax, 6MWD, and mMRC dyspnoea scores were lower than pre-operatively; QF remained unchanged; Pimax and 6MWD recovered to pre-operative values at post-lobectomy 1 month; and Pemax and mMRC dyspnoea scores recovered at 3 months. During sub-analysis, Pimax and mMRC dyspnoea scores in the VATS (n = 24) and PLT groups (n = 17) recovered to pre-operative values at post-lobectomy 1 and 3 months. CONCLUSION: After lobectomy, respiratory muscle strength, physical function, and dyspnoea in patients who underwent exercise intervention returned to pre-operative values at post-lobectomy 3 months.