[Questionnaire Survey of Radiation Protection Education in Hospitals].

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the current situation of radiation protection education for designated radiation workers in hospitals. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire survey was conducted at 1,883 hospitals nationwide with 200 or more beds. RESULTS: Responses from 186 hospitals were included in the analysis. Seven hospitals (6.7%) regulated by the Act on the Regulation of Radioisotopes and six hospitals (7.4%) regulated by only the Ordinance on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards did not implement radiation protection education. In approximately 6% of the hospitals, designated radiation workers-including physicians, nurses, and radiological technologist-did not attend the education program. The education program attendance rate of physicians was lower than that of nurses. In more than 90% of the hospitals, the frequency of the periodical education program was once every year and lecture time spanned one or less than one hour. The topics of lecture in more than 90% of the hospitals were health effects of radiation and methods of radiation protection for occupational exposure. The radiological technologist was the instructor of the education program in approximately 70% of the hospitals. CONCLUSION: The implementation of radiation protection for designated radiation workers varied from hospital to hospital, and some hospitals did not comply with laws and regulations. Effective and efficient radiation protection education models should be implemented in hospitals.

[Proposal for Reduction Measures of Eye Lens Exposure Based on Actual Exposure Management in Radiation-exposed Medical Staff].

PURPOSE: To investigate the actual condition of the crystalline lens equivalent dose and effective dose according to the type of job and the type of duties in a medical institution. We also sought to clarify effective exposure reduction strategies. METHODS: Equivalent crystalline lens doses, effective doses, job type, and duties for 8656 persons · year were obtained from 17 medical facilities. We analyzed the relationship between the effective dose and the crystalline lens equivalent dose in uniform exposure control and non-uniform exposure control conditions. Exposure data were obtained for 13 unique job types and duties. RESULTS: The ratio of the lens equivalent dose to the effective dose of non-uniform exposure managers was 2 to 6 times and varied depending on the occupation. The percentage of persons whose annual lens equivalent dose exceeded 20 mSv was 4.75% for medical doctors, 1.17% for nurses, and 0.24% for radiological technologists. Highly exposed tasks included doctors in cardiology and gastroenterology performing angiography and endoscopy, nurses in endoscopy, and radiological technologists in radiography and CT examinations. CONCLUSION: Thorough unequal exposure control for operations with high crystalline lens exposure, radiation protection education, and effective use of proper personal protective equipment such as the use of radiation protection glasses may reduce lens exposure levels.

Angular dependence of shielding effect of radiation protective eyewear for radiation protection of crystalline lens.

Radiation protective (RP) eyewear effectively protects crystalline lenses from radiation exposure. A drawback of RP eyewear is the angular dependence of the shielding effect, which results from the design of the eyewear. In this study, 21 models of RP eyewear with different designs and lead equivalences were assessed. Each piece of RP eyewear was hung on a Styrofoam phantom that imitated the head, and a 0.125-cc ionization chamber dosimeter was placed at the position of the crystalline lens. The differences in angular dependence of the shielding effect were evaluated by changing the irradiation angle, and parameters that improved the angular dependence of the shielding effect-sufficient lead equivalence, large coverage design, and minimum gap between the crystalline lens and the RP eyewear-were identified. Thus, the findings highlight the importance of selecting RP eyewear according to the angular distribution and the nature of radiation exposure in the workplace for radiation workers.

Effect of age-related baseline risk on radiation dose response for coronary heart disease.

We attempted to estimate the mortality risk of radiation-associated coronary heart disease (CHD) by using a model in which radiation was assumed to participate in the atherosclerotic process jointly with ageing. Model parameters were determined by fitting the Life Span Study data of atomic bomb survivors. According to the model, the excess relative risk (ERR) varies depending on the baseline risk; when applied to the death statistics of Japan and the USA, the estimated ERR was consistently higher in the Japanese population. The absolute risk showed an opposite trend, such that the estimated lifetime attributable risk was approximately two times higher in the US population. Excess cases were expected to appear in old age almost synchronously with spontaneous cases; in contrast, the risk is practically unnoticeable for those young to middle aged. Our model suggests that the radiation dose-response curve for CHD, as well as the latency in epidemiological studies, could be modified by the baseline risk.