Evaluation of pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: yield of diagnostic testing.

OBJECTIVE: Children and adolescents with newly diagnosed hypertension undergo various tests to define the cause and target organ consequences of the elevated blood pressure. We tested the hypothesis that the diagnostic yield of individual components of the currently recommended assessment does not justify performance for all patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who were referred between July 2002 and June 2007 for mild-to-moderate hypertension, defined as maximum blood pressure at >or=95% + 20/10 mmHg. The assessment included history and physical examination, nutritional assessment, urinalysis, biochemical and fasting lipid profile, renal ultrasound, echocardiogram, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were identified, and charts for 220 (88%) were available for review. There were 156 boys and 64 girls aged 13.3 +/- 4.4 years. BMI was 26.1 +/- 6.7 kg/m(2), and 143 (65%) had a BMI of >or=90%. Results of urinalysis and serum biochemical testing were clinically normal in all cases. Among those with a lipid profile, 59 (42%) had total cholesterol values of >170 mg/dL, and 26 (19%) had severe hypercholesterolemia (>200 mg/dL). Renal sonography revealed findings plausibly associated with hypertension in 14 (8%) patients; 4 (2%) had renovascular abnormalities. Yield of echocardiography was 17%. On ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, 47 (60%) children had systolic readings of >95% at least 20% of the time, and 28 (36%) had diastolic readings of >95% at least 20% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: For children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate hypertension, on the basis of a cutoff of 5% to 20% abnormal results to define a useful test, the initial evaluation can range from a serum cholesterol level and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to a panel that consists of a fasting lipid profile, renal ultrasound, echocardiogram, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Additional assessment should be guided by specific clinical features and the nature of the patient population.

Pilot study of mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of kidney disease due to congenital urinary tract disorders in children.

BACKGROUND: Congenital uropathies account for nearly half the chronic kidney disease in children. Immune-mediated injury may contribute to progressive loss of kidney function in affected patients. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label uncontrolled pilot study to determine the feasibility of treatment with the immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to prevent a decrease in kidney function in pediatric patients with congenital uropathies. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Children treated in an outpatient tertiary-care center were eligible if they had: (1) age of 3 to 16 years, (2) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and (3) a congenital genitourinary tract abnormality. INTERVENTION: After a 2-month run-in period, patients were prescribed MMF, 600 mg/m(2)/dose, twice daily for a 24-month treatment period. OUTCOMES: The primary end point was feasibility based on the ability to recruit and retain subjects and lack of unanticipated adverse events. The secondary end point was change in GFR. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were monitored by using standard clinical laboratory tests, and GFR was determined by means of iothalamate clearance. RESULTS: 12 patients aged 8.9 +/- 4.8 years (10 boys, 2 girls) were treated with MMF for 18.6 +/- 8.0 months; 7 patients completed the entire treatment period. MMF dosage at the final study visit was 381 +/- 241 mg/m(2) twice daily. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common adverse effect. There was only 1 serious adverse event, an episode of fever and neutropenia requiring parenteral antibiotic therapy after 21 months of MMF therapy. GFR remained stable throughout the treatment period. Nutritional status, blood pressure, and serum calcium, phosphorus, and cholesterol levels were unchanged during this period. LIMITATIONS: Insufficient power to assess the safety or efficacy of MMF therapy for patients with congenital uropathies. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to study MMF as an adjunctive therapy to retard the progression of kidney disease in children with congenital uropathies. A multicenter randomized clinical trial is warranted to determine the efficacy of this novel treatment strategy.