[The application of the BL-38 subjective complaints scale in an epidemiological cohort study (Study of Health in Pomerania)]. / Die Anwendung der Beschwerdeliste-38 zur Erhebung subjektiver Gesundheitsbeschwerden in einer epidemiologischen Kohortenstudie (Study of Health in Pomerania, SHIP).

The application of the BL-38 subjective complaints scale in an epidemiological cohort study (Study of Health in Pomerania) Objective: We provide an overview of the application of the BL-38 complaints scale in the epidemiological Study of Health in Pomerania. We examine the influence of socio-demographic variables on complaint burden and the stability of complaint burden over time. Methods: 16 studies that used the BL-38 in analyses of SHIP-data were examined in terms of how the BL-38 was operationalised and the statistically significant results yielded. We conduct linear regression analyses to assess effects of sociodemographic variables on complaint burden in four SHIP populations and assess test-retest-reliability over a 17-year period. Results: The BL-38 is predominantly used flexibly to depict specific complaints in analyses covering a heterogeneous range of disciplines and study questions. Total, somatic and mental complaint burden have different determinant, predictive and confounding effects. Test-retest-reliability was moderate. Conclusions: The BL-38 allows consideration of (specified) health complaint patterns across many research disciplines. Cross-sectional and longitudinal reproducibility of significant results underlines its validity. The results underscore the importance of subjective health complaints in epidemiological and psychosomatic research.

Self-labeling as having a mental or physical illness: the effects of stigma and implications for help-seeking.

PURPOSE: Personal and perceived stigma can hinder persons in appraising their symptoms as constituting part of a mental illness (self-labeling), an important early step in the help-seeking process. This study examines the impact of personal and perceived stigma on self-labeling and provides prospective data on the possible connections between self-labeling and help-seeking behavior. METHODS: Personal stigmatizing attitudes, perceived stigma and self-labeling behavior as well as their statistical connections were cross-sectionally investigated in a community sample of 207 participants with a present untreated mental health problem. We further conducted prospective analyses to investigate possible associations between self-labeling and help-seeking behavior at 3 and 6 month follow-ups. Socio-demographics, previous treatment and depression symptoms were also measured as potential confounders. RESULTS: Personal stigmatizing attitudes were significantly more pronounced in respondents who self-labeled as physically compared to mentally ill, while group differences in levels of perceived stigma were not. Self-labeling as physically or mentally ill increased the likelihood of seeking help from the health service provider deemed most suitable for that label (physical: GP, p <0.05; mental: MHP, p < 0.1) compared to persons who applied no self-label. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that personal stigmatizing attitudes-rather than perceived stigma-impact on self-labeling, and highlight the need for interventions that assist persons with mental illness in overcoming those attitudes. They also underscore the possible impact of self-labeling in the help-seeking process and underline the important role of GPs in mental health care. Further, preferably epidemiological research into the matter would be desirable.

Validity and psychometric properties of the Self-Identification as Having a Mental Illness Scale (SELF-I) among currently untreated persons with mental health problems.

Conceptualizing own symptoms as potential signs of a mental illness is an important, yet under-researched step towards appropriate help. Few validated measures address recognition and identification of own mental illness. Aim of this study is to investigate performance and correlates of the 'Self-Identification as Having a Mental Illness' scale (SELF-I) in a group of 229 currently untreated individuals with mental health problems, predominantly depression. Measures included: self-identification with having a mental illness (SELF-I), depressive and somatic symptom severity (PHQ-9 and PHQ-15), illness perceptions (B-IPQ-R-C), and sociodemographic variables. Principal-component analysis revealed in a unidimensional factor structure. The SELF-I showed good reliability in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.85-0.87) and re-test reliability over three months (Intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.74). Associations with depressive symptoms, previous treatment experiences and self-labelling demonstrated construct and criterion validity. Low associations with somatic symptoms and with illness-perceptions as measured by the B-IPQ-R-C indicated discriminant validity. We did not observe any floor or ceiling effects. The SELF-I scale is a brief, unidimensional and reliable measure of self-identification as having a mental illness that offers useful research perspectives.