The authority of next-of-kin in explicit and presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation: an analysis of 54 nations.

BACKGROUND: The degree of involvement by the next-of-kin in deceased organ procurement worldwide is unclear. We investigated the next-of-kin's authority in the procurement process in nations with either explicit or presumed consent. METHODS: We collected data from 54 nations, 25 with presumed consent and 29 with explicit consent. We characterized the authority of the next-of-kin in the decision to donate deceased organs. Specifically, we examined whether the next-of-kin's consent to procure organs was always required and whether the next-of-kin were able to veto procurement when the deceased had expressed a wish to donate. RESULTS: The next-of-kin are involved in the organ procurement process in most nations regardless of the consent principle and whether the wishes of the deceased to be a donor were expressed or unknown. Nineteen of the 25 nations with presumed consent provide a method for individuals to express a wish to be a donor. However, health professionals in only four of these nations responded that they do not override a deceased's expressed wish because of a family's objection. Similarly, health professionals in only four of the 29 nations with explicit consent proceed with a deceased's pre-existing wish to be a donor and do not require next-of-kin's consent, but caveats still remain for when this is done. CONCLUSIONS: The next-of-kin have a considerable influence on the organ procurement process in both presumed and explicit consent nations.

Informing the debate: rates of kidney transplantation in nations with presumed consent.

BACKGROUND: The kidney is the most common transplanted organ, accounting for almost all living donor transplantations and most deceased donor organ transplantations. The organ shortage has caused policymakers in many nations to debate the merits of adopting presumed consent legislation as a way to increase donor organ donation from deceased donors. OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics and kidney transplantation rates for countries with presumed consent for deceased organ donation with countries with explicit consent. DESIGN: A longitudinal study of international kidney transplantation from 1997 to 2007. SETTING: 44 nations performing kidney transplantation. PATIENTS: Recipients of deceased and living kidney donor transplants. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of transplantation of kidneys from deceased and living donors. RESULTS: National characteristics, such as population size, proportion of the population self-identified as Catholic, per capita gross domestic product, health expenditures, and physician density, varied widely for the 22 nations with presumed consent and the 22 nations with explicit consent. Deceased donor kidney transplantation rates were higher in nations with presumed consent (median, 22.6 transplantations per million population [pmp]; interquartile range [IQR], 9.3 to 33.8) versus nations with explicit consent (median, 13.9 transplantations pmp; IQR, 3.6 to 23.1). Living donor kidney transplantation rates were lower in nations with presumed consent (median, 2.4 transplantations pmp; IQR, 1.7 to 4.3) versus nations with explicit consent (median, 5.9 transplantations pmp; IQR, 2.3 to 12.2). The findings were consistent when nations were classified according to per capita gross domestic product, health expenditures, and physician density. LIMITATION: As with any observational study, associations may not be causal. CONCLUSION: Nations with presumed consent have higher rates of deceased donor kidney transplantation than nations with explicit consent. Any nation deciding to adopt presumed consent should carefully consider and reduce any negative effect on rates of living donation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Lawson Health Research Institute.

Discovering misattributed paternity in living kidney donation: prevalence, preference, and practice.

When evaluating a living kidney donor and recipient with a father-child relationship, it may be discovered that the two are not biologically related. We analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing and the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry to determine how frequently this occurs. We surveyed 102 potential donors, recipients, and transplant professionals for their opinion on whether such information should be disclosed to the donor-recipient pair. We communicated with transplant professionals from 13 Canadian centers on current practices for handling this information. In the United States and Canada, the prevalence of father-child living kidney donor-recipient pairs with less than a one-haplotype human leukocyte antigen match (i.e., misattributed paternity) is between 1% and 3%, or approximately 0.25% to 0.5% of all living kidney donations. Opinions about revealing this information were variable: 23% strongly favored disclosure; whereas, 24% were strongly opposed to it. Current practices are variable; some centers disclose this information, whereas others do not. Discovering misattributed paternity in living donation is uncommon but can occur. Opinions on how to deal with this sensitive information are variable. Discussion among transplant professionals will facilitate best practices and policies. Strategies adopted by some centers can be considered.