Factors Associated With Pelvic Infection After Pre-Peritoneal Pelvic Packing for Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures.

Background: Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) and external fixation has led to improved mortality after devastating pelvic trauma. However, there is limited literature on infection after this intervention. We aim to study the risk factors associated with pelvic infection after PPP. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent PPP at a single level 1 trauma center was performed. Results: Over the 18-year study period, 222 patients were identified. Twenty-three percent of patients had an open fracture. Pelvic angiography was performed in 24% of patients with 16% requiring angioembolization (AE). The average time to packing removal was two (one to two days) days, although 10% of patients had their pelvis re-packed. Overall infection rate was 14% (n = 31); if pelvic re-packing was performed, the infection rate increased to 45%. Twenty-two of the patients with an infection required additional procedures for their infection, and ultimately hardware removal occurred in eight patients. On univariable analysis, patients with pelvic infections had more open fractures (55% vs. 17%; p < 0.01), underwent AE more frequently (29% vs. 14%; p = 0.04), were more likely to undergo repacking (32% vs. 6%; p < 0.01), and had packing in place for longer (2 [1,2] vs. 2 [2,3]; p = 0.01). On logistic multivariable regression analysis, open fracture (odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-14.1) and pelvic re-packing (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2-18.5) were independent risk factors for pelvic infection. Conclusions: Pelvic infection after PPP is a serious complication independently associated with open fracture and re-packing of the pelvis. Re-intervention was required in most patients with infection.

Handoffs and Transitions of Care: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Practice Management Guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission reports at least half of communication breakdowns occur during handovers or transitions of care. There is no consensus on how best to approach the transfer of care within Acute Care Surgery (ACS). We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current data on handoffs and transitions of care in ACS patients and evaluate the impact of standardization and formalized communication processes. METHODS: Clinically relevant questions regarding handoffs and transitions of care with clearly defined patient Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and appropriately selected Outcomes (PICO) were determined. These centered around specific transitions of care within the setting of ACS - specifically perioperative interactions, EMS and trauma team interactions, and intra/inter floor and ICU interactions. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were identified for analysis. These included 5,113 patients in the standardized handoff group and 5,293 in the current process group. Standardized handoffs reduced handover errors for perioperative interactions and preventable adverse events for intra/inter floor and ICU interactions. There was insufficient data to evaluate outcomes of clinical complications and medical errors. CONCLUSION: We conditionally recommend a standardized handoff in in the field of ACS, including perioperative interactions, EMS and trauma team interactions, as well as intra-inter floor and ICU interactions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Guideline; Systematic review/meta-analysis, Level III.

Early Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures is Feasible in Patients With Non-Urgent Operative Pelvic Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The feasibility of prioritizing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in patients with other injuries is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing and outcomes of SSRF between patients with and without non-urgent operative pelvic injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, all patients between 2010 and 2020 who underwent SSRF (SSRF group) and those who underwent SSRF and non-urgent operative management of pelvic fractures (SSRF + P group) were included. Demographics, injury characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Over 11 years, 154 SSRF patients were identified, with 143 patients in the SSRF group (93%) and 11 patients in the SSRF + P group (7%). Median number of rib fractures (7 vs 9, P = .04), total number of fractures (11 vs 15, P < .01), and flail segment (54% vs 91%, P = .02) were higher in SSRF + P group. Median time to SSRF was similar (0 vs 1 day, P = .20) between the 2 groups. Median time to pelvic fixation was 3 days in SSRF + P group and 8 out of 11 patients (73%) underwent SSRF prior to pelvic fixation. Median operative time (137 vs 178 mins, P = .14) and median number of ribs plated (4 vs 5, P = .05) were higher in SSRF + P group. There was no difference in SSRF-related complications, pelvic fracture-related complications from operative positioning, rates of pneumonia, or mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: SSRF can be performed early in patients with non-urgent operative pelvic injuries without a difference in pelvic fracture-related complications, SSRF-related complications, pneumonia, or mortality.

Contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries: Validation of the 2020 AAST Colon Organ Injury Scale.

INTRODUCTION: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Colon Organ Injury Scale (OIS) was updated in 2020 to include a separate OIS for penetrating colon injuries and included imaging criteria. In this multicenter study, we describe the contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries and hypothesize that the 2020 OIS system correlates with operative management, complications, and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients presenting to 12 Level 1 trauma centers between 2016 and 2020 with penetrating colon injuries and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of <3 in other body regions. We assessed the association of the new OIS with surgical management and clinical outcomes and the association of OIS imaging criteria with operative criteria. Bivariate analysis was done with χ 2 , analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis, where appropriate. Multivariable models were constructed in a stepwise selection fashion. RESULTS: We identified 573 patients with penetrating colon injuries. Patients were young and predominantly male; 79% suffered a gunshot injury, 11% had a grade V destructive injury, 19% required ≥6 U of transfusion, 24% had an Injury Severity Score of >15, and 42% had moderate-to-large contamination. Higher OIS was independently associated with a lower likelihood of primary repair, higher likelihood of resection with anastomosis and/or diversion, need for damage-control laparotomy, and higher incidence of abscess, wound infection, extra-abdominal infections, acute kidney injury, and lung injury. Damage control was independently associated with diversion and intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal infections. Preoperative imaging in 152 (27%) cases had a low correlation with operative findings ( κ coefficient, 0.13). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date of penetrating colon injuries and the first multicenter validation of the new OIS specific to these injuries. While imaging criteria alone lacked strong predictive value, operative American Association for the Surgery of Trauma OIS colon grade strongly predicted type of interventions and outcomes, supporting use of this grading scale for research and clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

The Need for Accurate Risk Assessment in a High-Risk Patient Population: A NSQIP Study Evaluating Outcomes of Cholecystectomy in the Patient With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is considered a low-risk procedure with proven safety in many high-risk patient populations. However, the risk of cholecystectomy in patients with active cancer has not been established. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was queried to identify all patients with disseminated cancer who underwent cholecystectomy from 2005 to 2016. Postcholecystectomy outcomes were defined for patients with cancer and those without by comparing several outcomes measures. A multivariate model was used to estimate the odds of 30-d mortality. RESULTS: We compared outcomes in 3097 patients with disseminated cancer to a matched cohort of patients without cancer. Patients with cancer had more comorbidities at baseline: dyspnea (10.5% versus 7.0%, P < 0.0001), steroid use (10.1% versus 3.0%, P < 0.0001), and loss of >10% body weight in 6-mo prior (9.3% versus 1.6%, P < 0.0001). Patients with cancer sustained higher rates of wound (2.3% versus 5.6%, P < 0.0001), respiratory (1.4% versus 3.9%, P < 0.0001), and cardiovascular (2.0% versus 6.8%, P < 0.0001) complications. In addition, patients with disseminated cancer experienced a longer length of stay and higher 30-d mortality. Multivariate modeling showed that the odds of 30-d mortality was 3.3 times greater in patients with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients without cancer, those with disseminated cancer are at higher risk of complication and mortality following cholecystectomy. Traditional treatment algorithms should be used with caution and care decisions individualized based on the patient's disease status and treatment goals.

Letters of recommendation for surgical fellowships - Does gender make a difference?

BACKGROUND: Females comprise 1/3 of general surgery residents, 1/4 of surgical faculty and 10% of full professors. Inadequate sponsorship is one proposed mechanism for this decline. This study evaluated letters of recommendation (LOR) among applicants applying to a complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) fellowship. METHODS: Linguistic analysis of LOR for CGSO applicants was conducted. Demographics of authors and features of the LOR were extracted. Differences by gender of the applicant were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 340 letters, 67% were written for male and 33% written for female applicants. Males authored 84% of letters reviewed. Female authors used more grindstone adjectives than males (3.61 v 2.90). However, this difference was seen only among letters written for male applicants (3.82 v. 2.73). All other linguistic features were similar, aside from mention of physical appearance which was significantly more common in letters written about female applicants (4% v. 1%). CONCLUSIONS: Female authors write substantively different letters than males. Physical appearance is a small but important difference in letters for female applicants.

Stop Flying the Patients! Evaluation of the Overutilization of Helicopter Transport of Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Helicopter transport is a resource intensive and expensive method for transportation of patients by helicopter. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of helicopter transport determined by procedural care within 1-h of transfer at an urban level I trauma center. METHODS: All trauma patients transported by helicopter from January 2015-December 2017 to an urban level I trauma center from referring hospitals or the scene were retrospectively analyzed. A subgroup analysis was performed evaluating patients that required a procedure or operation within 1-h of transport compared with the remainder of the patient cohort who were transported via helicopter. RESULTS: A total of 1590 patients were transported by helicopter. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n = 612) were admitted directly to the floor from the trauma bay and 16% (n = 249) of patients required only observation or were discharged home after helicopter transfer. Approximately one-third of the entire study cohort (36%, n = 572) required any procedure, with a median time to procedure of 31.5 h (interquartile range 54.4). Only 13% (n = 74) required a procedure within 1-h of helicopter transport. The average distance (in miles) if the patient had been driven by ground transport rather than helicopter was 67.0 miles (SD ± 27.9) and would take an estimated 71.5 min (±28.4) for patients who required a procedure within 1-h compared with 61.6 miles (SD ± 30.9) with an estimated 66.1 min (SD ± 30.8) for the remainder of the cohort (P value 0.899 and 0.680, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that helicopter transport was not necessary for the vast majority of trauma patients transported via helicopter.

Combating the Opioid Epidemic in Acute General Surgery: Reframing Inpatient Acute Pain Management.

BACKGROUND: The devastating effects of the opioid epidemic are well documented. We implemented a surgeon/pharmacist opioid reduction initiative at an academic medical center that incorporated multimodal pain therapy in an attempt to reduce total inpatient opioids prescribed. We hypothesized that less opioids would be used postoperatively without affecting pain scores or length of stay. METHODS: This single-center observational cohort analysis included patients admitted to the acute general surgical service and had one of 10 emergent general surgical (nontrauma) procedures. Patients who underwent surgery before the opioid reduction initiative were compared with patients who underwent surgery postinitiative. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in daily oral morphine equivalents and average pain scores in patients before and after implementation of the surgeon/pharmacist initiative. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients in the preopioid reduction initiative group and 92 patients in the postopioid reduction initiative group met inclusion criteria. Oral morphine equivalents were significantly different at 24 h before discharge when comparing across both year (P = 0.032) and number of procedures (P = 0.013). Our results showed decreased opioid utilization in the postopioid reduction initiative group on all observed postoperative days with unaffected pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: An opioid reduction initiative showed promise in lowering the number of opioids used during inpatient admission without affecting pain scores in emergent general surgical procedures. This initiative can be easily reproduced at other institutions to help combat the opioid epidemic.

Does use of axillary ultrasound in clinically node-negative patients receiving neo-adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer lead to surgical overtreatment?

Increased use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer has raised uncertainty regarding staging of the axilla, particularly for patients with a clinically negative axillary physical examination (PE). We sought to determine whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) prior to NAC to identify occult nodal disease is beneficial in patients with a clinically negative examination by evaluating the difference in nodal burden on final pathology in those with abnormal vs normal AUS. A retrospective review of an institutional cancer registry identified patients who underwent NAC for breast cancer and had a pretreatment AUS. Differences in the number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) in patients with a normal axillary PE and abnormal vs normal AUS prior to NAC were determined. A total of 120 patients who received NAC had a negative axillary PE prior to treatment. Fifty-three had an abnormal AUS and biopsy-proven lymph node (LN) involvement. In patients with an abnormal AUS, median number of PLNs at surgery was 1 vs 0 for those with a normal AUS (mean difference of 2.12, P < .0001). Of those patients with an abnormal AUS and biopsy-proven LN involvement, 87% underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and nearly half had no PLN on final pathology (N = 23, 43%). Patients with a clinically negative axilla and an abnormal AUS were more likely to have PLN at the time of surgery. However, almost half of those patients had no residual LN involvement. Routine AUS prior to NAC may lead to more extensive surgical management of the axilla.

Contact Lens Versus Non-Contact Lens-Related Corneal Ulcers at an Academic Center.

PURPOSE: To compare the infectious contact lens-related corneal ulcer (CLRU) and non-CLRU cases at Saint Louis University. METHODS: Retrospective review of corneal ulcer cases identified by search of the ophthalmology and microbiology department databases between 1999 and 2016. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-seven cases of corneal ulcers were identified, of which 46% were CLRU. CLRU cases were seen more commonly in younger patients (P<0.001) and women (P=0.03) than non-CLRU cases. Many of the infections were vision-threatening as defined by central/paracentral location (73% CLRU and 71% non-CLRU [P=0.60]) and large size of ulcer >2 mm in 36% CLRU and 51% non-CLRU (P=0.002). Causative pathogen in cultured CLRU was predominately Pseudomonas species (44%, P<0.001 vs. the non-CLRU group), other gram-negative (6%), gram-positive (33%), fungi (13%), and Acanthamoeba (5%). Comparatively, cultured non-CLRU was predominately gram-positive (64%, P<0.001 vs. the CLRU group), gram-negative (26%), and fungi (11%). The combined oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates were 35% and 34%, respectively. Despite the progressive increase in the number of corneal ulcers seen, the annual trend for any one particular organism for either CLRU cases or non-CLRU cases did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the cases were non-CLRU. CLRU was disproportionately associated with Pseudomonas species and non-CLRU with Staphylococcal species. Fungal infections were predominately caused by filamentous organisms in both groups. Acanthamoeba keratitis was exclusively associated with CL use.

Radioactive seed vs wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: A single institution review.

The aim of this study was to compare wire localization (WL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) for nonpalpable breast lesions with regard to margin status, re-excision rate, procedure length, and complications related to localization. A retrospective review of the electronic health records at a single institution was performed. There was no difference in re-excision rate, margin positivity, volume of tissue removed, and complication rate for RSL vs WL (P = 0.9934, P = 0.9934, P = 0.6645, and P = 0.4716 respectively). The only difference was a longer OR time, RSL = 104.408 minutes vs WL = 82.386 minutes. (P = 0.0163). RSL and WL are comparable techniques for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Continuous Cardiac Monitoring Policy Implementation: Three-year Sustained Decrease of Hospital Resource Utilization.

Inappropriate cardiac monitoring leads to increased hospital resource utilization and alarm fatigue, which is ultimately detrimental to patient safety. Our institution implemented a continuous cardiac monitoring (CCM) policy that focused on selective monitoring for patients based on the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. The primary goal of this study was to perform a three-year median follow-up review on the longitudinal impact of a selective CCM policy on usage rates, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates across the medical center. A secondary goal was to determine the effect of smaller-scale interventions focused on reeducating the nursing population on the importance of cardiac alarms. A system-wide policy was developed at The Ohio State University in December 2013 based on guidelines for selective CCM in all patient populations. Patients were stratified into Critical Class I, II, and III with 72 hours, 48 hours, or 36 hours of CCM, respectively. Pre- and post-implementation measures included average cardiac monitoring days (CMD), emergency department (ED) boarding rate, mortality rates, and LOS. A 12-week evaluation period was analyzed prior to, directly after, and three years after implementation. There was an overall decrease of 53.5% CMDs directly after implementation of selective CCM. This had remained stable at the three-year follow-up with slight increase of 0.5% (p = 0.2764). Subsequent analysis by hospital type revealed that the largest and most stable reductions in CMD were in noncardiac hospitals. The cardiac hospital CMD reduction was stable for roughly one year, then dipped into a lower stable level for nine months, then returned to the previous post-implementation levels. This change coincided with a smaller intervention to further reduce CMD in the cardiac hospital. There was no significant change in mortality rates with a slight decrease of 3.1% at follow-up (p = 0.781). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in LOS with a slight increase of 1.1% on follow-up (p = 0.649). However, there was a significant increase in ED boarding rate of 7.7% (p < 0.001) likely due to other hospital factors altering boarding times. Implementing selective CCM decreases average cardiac monitoring rate without affecting LOS or overall mortality rate. Selective cardiac monitoring is also a sustainable way to decrease overall hospital resource utilization and more appropriately focus on patient care.

Laboratory Results, Epidemiologic Features, and Outcome Analyses of Microbial Keratitis: A 15-Year Review From St. Louis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the laboratory results and prognostic factors of poor clinical outcomes in microbial keratitis cases over 15 years at Saint Louis University. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort and trend study. METHODS: Microbiological and clinical information from culture-positive cases seen at Saint Louis University from 1999 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Statistical analyses were used to determine microbiological and antibiotic susceptibility trends. Prognostic factors of poor clinical outcome from the literature were used to create multivariate regression models to describe our cohort. RESULTS: Gram-positive organisms predominated (48%), followed by gram-negative organisms (34%) and fungi (16%). The most commonly isolated organism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21%). Oxacillin-resistant rates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were 45% and 43%, respectively. Only the proportion of Pseudomonas changed significantly over time (P = .02). The only antibiotic found to lose efficacy over time was gentamicin for gram-positive organisms (P = .005). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that major complications were associated with large ulcers (P < .006), fungal cases (P < .001), and comorbid ophthalmic conditions (P < .001). Poor healing was associated with large ulcers (P < .001) and fungal cases (P < .001). Lastly, poor visual outcome was associated with large ulcers (P < .01) and age ≥ 60 years (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: In the St Louis area, oxacillin-resistant organisms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and fungi are commonly recovered from microbial keratitis cases with a disproportionally high incidence. Hence, empiric antibiotic choice should reflect these trends. Special care needs to be taken for patients with large ulcers and fungal infections, as well as elderly patients with comorbid ophthalmic conditions, as these patients have worse clinical outcomes.

Long-Term Results After Lung Volume Reduction Surgery: A Single Institution's Experience.

BACKGROUND: The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) showed a clear survival and quality of life benefit for patients selected for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). However, long-term outcomes after LVRS are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall mortality and functional durability in this single-institution cohort of patients undergoing LVRS. METHODS: A single-institution registry identified all patients who had undergone LVRS from January 2006 through August 2017. Records were retrospectively reviewed, and data were collected to include pulmonary functions test values, he University of California, San Diego shortness of breath questionnaire and complication and mortality rate. RESULTS: LVRS was performed in 135 patients with a 2.2% 90-day mortality rate (n = 3). Estimated 1-, 2- and 5-year survival was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 0.97), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.81), respectively. Mean improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second% predicted from preoperative baseline at 1 and 2 years was 5.3 (95% CI, 3.1 to 7.4) and 4.3 (95% CI, 1.9 to 6.6), respectively. There was a mean improvement in maximum workload of 5.2 W (95% CI, 0.9 to 9.4) at 1 year. Also, shortness of breath questionnaire scores had a mean decrease of -17.3 points (95% CI, -21.8 to -13) at 6 months and -13.9 points (95% CI, -18.4 to -9.3) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: LVRS is an effective operation with overall improvement in functional status and quality of life in appropriately selected patients.

A qualitative analysis of clinical decompensation in the surgical patient: Perceptions of nurses and physicians.

BACKGROUND: There is little knowledge on how health care providers individually interpret and communicate early warning signs to other providers. The aim of the study described here was to qualitatively assess the similarities and differences in how nurses and physicians perceive early warning signs that potentially predict clinical decompensation, changes in clinical acuity in surgical patients, and need for escalation of care. METHODS: Ethnographic interviews were conducted with nurses, surgical residents, and attending surgeons on an acute care medical-surgical unit. Constant comparative analysis was used to analyze and draw conclusions from the interview data. RESULTS: There were many areas of strong agreement across all care providers including the same data analyzed, importance of temporal trends, and lower acuity level for an established patient. However, physicians differed from nurses in that their primary indicator of patient stability was their level of confidence in the current diagnosis. Nurses, however, deemed patients to be stable only when their symptoms resolved. Other differences were the methods and frequency they used to monitor unstable patients. CONCLUSION: Differences in the type of communication and clinician's mental models of acuity and stability could lead to coordination failures and adverse events. Understanding and addressing these differences has the potential to improve outcomes.

Improving the mortality index by capturing patient acuity through interprofessional real-time documentation improvement in a single hospital system.

BACKGROUND: The observed to expected mortality ratio is a standardized way for reporting inpatient mortality and is used as a measure for hospital quality rankings and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services value-based payments. The goal of this study is to describe a single institution's mortality index improvement initiative through improved documentation of patient severity. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected October 2016 through May 2017 on patients discharged from the acute care surgery, open heart surgery, neurosurgery, and University Hospital East. Mortalities were reviewed by a multidisciplinary committee for missed coding opportunities. These captured codes were adjusted based on the Vizient risk-adjustment model for mortality and the observed to expected mortality ratio was calculated. RESULTS: Every service reviewed showed improvement in the expected mortality rate. Additional coding opportunities were present in 55.6% of acute care surgery, 24.3% of neurosurgery, 18.3% of open heart surgery, and 35.3% of University Hospital East cases. A total of 70 codes were improved during the 8-month period. The acute care surgery service showed the most improvement, with a 0.45 improvement in the observed to expected mortality ratio, followed by neurosurgery, with 0.43 improvement. CONCLUSION: Institutional observed to expected mortality ratio can be improved by targeting high-acuity services and capturing coding opportunities, leading to improvement in value-based payments and rankings.

Management outcomes of diverticulitis and colitis in patients with active cancer.

BACKGROUND: Little is reported in the literature on management strategies and outcomes in patients with an active cancer diagnosis who undergo emergent general surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate preoperative risk factors in both operative and non-operative management, as well as to describe the outcomes of colonic emergencies within a cancer patient population. METHODS: A single institution cancer database was reviewed retrospectively to identify patients with an active cancer diagnosis who had an emergency general surgery consult placed for an acute colonic pathology. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included. Among these, 38 patients underwent operative and 49 underwent nonoperative management. There was a 71% rate of postoperative complications in the operative group; these patients were also more likely to require intensive care unit admission (P < .001), die during their hospitalization (P = .003), have a greater 30-day mortality (P = .001) and were less likely to be discharged to home (P < .001). No patients in the nonoperative group required admission to the intensive care unit, 3 of the 49 (6%) died during their hospitalization, and 75% of nonoperative patients were discharged to home. CONCLUSION: When clinically appropriate, patients with active cancer who present with an acute colonic emergency can undergo nonoperative management safely. In contrast, patients undergoing operative management have a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality.