An experimental algorithm versus standard advanced cardiac life support in a swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare an experimental algorithm with standard advanced cardiac life support in a swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled experimental trial. SETTING/TYPE OF PARTICIPANT: Animal laboratory using swine. INTERVENTIONS: Eighteen swine (17.8 to 23.7 kg) were sedated, intubated, anesthetized, and instrumented for monitoring of arterial and central venous pressures and ECG. Ventricular fibrillation was induced using a bipolar pacing catheter. Animals were randomized to treatment with the experimental algorithm or standard advanced cardiac life support therapy after eight minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation. The experimental algorithm consisted of starting CPR; giving high-dose epinephrine (0.20 mg/kg), lidocaine (1.0 mg/kg), bretylium (5.0 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.5 to 1.0 mg) by peripheral IV; hyperventilating (20 to 25 breaths per minute); and delaying countershock (5 J/kg) 60 seconds after completion of drug delivery. Data were analyzed with the Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcome variables were arterial and central venous pressures, return of spontaneous circulation, and one-hour survival. Hemodynamics were not different between groups during CPR. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in seven of nine swine (77%) in the experimental algorithm group versus two of nine swine (22%) in the advanced cardiac life support group (P = .057). Four of nine swine (44%) in the experimental algorithm group survived to one hour versus none of the animals in the advanced cardiac life support group (P = .041). CONCLUSION: In this swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, animals treated with an experimental algorithm had a significant improvement in one-hour survival compared with those treated with advanced cardiac life support.

Two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression during CRP in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that two-thumb chest compression generates higher arterial and coronary perfusion pressures than the current American Heart Association-approved two-finger method. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover experimental trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Animal laboratory experiment with seven swine of either sex weighing 9.4 kg (SD, 0.8 kg), representing infants less than 1 year old. INTERVENTIONS: Animals were sedated with IM ketamine/xylazine, intubated with a 6.0 Hi-Lo endotracheal tube, anesthetized with alpha-chloralose, and paralyzed with pancuronium. ECG was monitored continuously. Left femoral arterial and Swan-Ganz catheters were placed. Cardiac arrest was induced with an IV bolus of KCl and verified by ECG and pressure tracings. Five American Heart Association-certified basic rescuers were randomly assigned to perform external chest compressions for one minute by either the currently recommended two-finger method or the two-thumb and thorax-squeeze method. After all five completed their first trial, rescuers crossed over to the other method for a second minute of compressions. Ventilation was performed with a bag-valve device, and no drugs were given during CPR. After three complete cycles, the fourth through sixth cycles of compressions were recorded. Every compression was analyzed for arterial systolic, diastolic, mean, and coronary perfusion pressures. One thousand fifty compressions were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and Scheffé multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and coronary perfusion pressure were all significantly higher (P < .001) with the two-thumb thoracic squeeze technique: systolic blood pressure, 59.4 versus 41.6 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure, 21.8 versus 18.5 mm Hg; mean arterial pressure, 34.2 versus 26.1 mm Hg; and coronary perfusion pressure, 15.1 versus 12.2 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: The two-thumb method of chest compression generates significantly higher arterial and coronary perfusion pressures than the two-finger method in this infant model of cardiac arrest.