Aliskiren reduces morning blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy on hemodialysis.

Our previous study indicated that the exchange from an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to aliskiren reduced morning blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. We extended the above study and assessed the effects of exchanging from an ARB to aliskiren on home blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy on chronic hemodialysis. The patients who were persistently hypertensive despite antihypertensive therapy, including ARB, were considered as candidates for the exchange from the ARB to aliskiren. Patients' age and durations of diabetes and hemodialysis were averaged as 62 ± 9 years old, 15 ± 8 and 7 ± 3 years, respectively. Aliskiren decreased morning systolic blood pressure (149 ± 14 to 144 ± 13 mm Hg, n = 30, P < .01) and plasma renin activity (3.5 ± 1.1 to 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL/h, P < .01) without changes in serum potassium. Aliskiren also reduced interdialytic weight gain (2.7 ± 0.6 to 2.5 ± 0.5 kg/interval, P < .05) and attenuated the magnitude of intradialytic declines in systolic (-20 ± 11 to -17 ± 10 mm Hg, P < .05) and diastolic blood pressure (-9 ± 6 to -5 ± 5 mm Hg, P < .01). The exchange from an ARB to aliskiren is safe and useful to control home blood pressure in hypertensive hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy. Aliskiren reduced both intradialytic blood pressure drops and interdialytic weight gain in patients with DN.

Daily hemodialysis improves uremia-associated clinical parameters in the short term.

Observational studies suggest that home hemodialysis (HHD) is associated with improvements in several important clinical parameters. These include better control of blood pressure, reductions in left ventricular hypertrophy, calcium-phosphate production, improved nutritional status and enhanced health-related quality of life. In Japan, many case reports and studies of small series of patients treated with HHD have been published mainly in Japanese. The current study was to describe the short-term effects in patients starting HHD at the Kidney Disease Center, Saitama Medical University. This study represents a comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of switching patients from conventional in-center hemodialysis to HHD in Japan. The pertinent findings are as follows: an improvement in blood pressure control paralleled with a reduction in antihypertensive pharmacotherapy an improvement in serum albumin and hemoglobin levels, and a simultaneous reduction in erythropoietin-stimulating agent, calcium and phosphate levels. In conclusion, our study confirms that selected patients may benefit from HHD which offers an attractive treatment alternative and improvements provided by HHD might ultimately have an impact On patient Survival.

Aliskiren reduces morning blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a leading disease that requires renal replacement therapy. The progression of renal dysfunction in DN is faster than the other renal diseases. While antihypertensive therapy reduces albuminuria, a good indicator for the progression, hypertension in DN is treatment resistant. Among patients with DN who took angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 27 patients who exhibited poor control of albuminuria were enrolled into the study. Angiotensin receptor blocker was exchanged to aliskiren (150-300 mg/d) and clinical parameters were followed for 6 months. Exchange to aliskiren decreased albuminuria (1.57 ± 0.68 to 0.89 ± 0.45 g/gCr, P < .01) without changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and office blood pressure (BP). Body weight and hemoglobin A1c were not altered. Aliskiren also reduced plasma renin activity (2.0 ± 0.9 to 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL/h, P < .01). While evening BP was unchanged, morning systolic BP (139 ± 8 to 132 ± 7 mm Hg, P < .01) and diastolic BP (81 ± 7 to 76 ± 6 mm Hg, P < .05) were decreased significantly after 6 months. Our results indicated that aliskiren decreased BP, especially morning BP in hypertensive patients with DN. The present data suggest that aliskiren exerts renoprotective actions including reduction in albumin excretion for patients with DN.

Amlodipine and loop diuretics as the second anti-hypertensive medication for the treatment of hypertension with chronic kidney diseases.

Renoprotective effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are well known. However, hypertension with chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) is usually hard to manage with a single agent, and requires the addition of either a calcium antagonist or diuretics to achieve the goal of blood pressure (BP) lowering. Retrospective study was performed among the patients who regularly visited our office, and whose BP had not reached the goal of BP despite of treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker. Clinical parameters were observed for 6 months. Comparisons of home BP and proteinuria were made between 16 patients prescribed additional calcium antagonists and 15 patients with diuretics. Patient background including age, sex BP, augmentation index, and renal function were similar between the two groups. Both calcium antagonists and diuretics considerably decreased BP. An addition of either agent resulted in similar control of home BP. While both agents reduced augmentation index (AI), calcium antagonist exerted greater improvements in AI (-7 ± 5 vs. -4 ± 3%, p < 0.01). Although urinary protein excretion in both groups was decreased, the degree of these decreases was greater among the patients treated with a calcium antagonist (-28 ± 15 vs. -11 ± 15%, p < 0.01). During observation periods, eGFR in both groups did not show any significant changes from the base line. Under the inhibition of a renin-angiotensin system, calcium antagonists elicited a greater decrease in urinary protein excretion than diuretics when BP similarly controlled. Calcium antagonists also improved AI more strongly than diuretics. Calcium antagonists appear suited for adding on renin angiotensin system inhibitors to treat hypertension with CKDs.

Height constitutes an important predictor of mortality in end-stage renal disease.

Aim. Height is an important determinant of augmentation index (AI) that anticipates cardiovascular prognosis. There is a scanty of the data whether short height predicts survival in patients with end-stage renal diseases, a high risk population. Methods. Fifty two hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy receiving hemodialysis and 52 patients with nondiabetic nephropathy were enrolled. In addition to AI estimated with radial artery tonometry, classical cardiovascular risk factors were considered. Patients were followed for 2 years to assess cardiovascular prognosis. Results. Cox hazards regression revealed that both smoking and shortness in height independently contributed to total mortality and indicated that smoking as well as the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy predicted cardiovascular mortality. Our findings implicated that high AI, the presence of diabetes, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significant contributors to cardiovascular events. Conclusions. Our findings provide new evidence that shortness in height independently contributes to total mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Seasonal variations of daily changes in blood pressure among hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases.

Hypertension is a well-known cardiovascular risk. Patients with end-stage renal diseases frequently suffer hypertension, and their blood pressure elevates in winter. However, seasonal changes in daily variations of blood pressure are poorly assessed in patients treated with hemodialysis. Thirty hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases were enrolled in the study. Dry weight and antihypertensive medications were altered when they were necessary. Home blood pressure measurements were performed at least for 1 week in each season; April-May 2008, July-August 2008, October-November 2008, and January-February 2009. Both morning and evening systolic blood pressures (SBPs) showed significant seasonal changes ( p < 0.01), with the highest blood pressure in winter (162 +/- 18 and 135 +/- 22 mmHg in morning and evening). Morning diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also exhibited seasonal changes ( p < 0.05), with the highest blood pressure in fall ( 78 +/- 8 mmHg). Evening DBP did not manifest seasonal deviations. Morning-evening differences in SBP and DBP were the greatest in winter (28 +/- 21 and 10 +/- 9 mmHg in SBP and DBP, p < 0.01), and the smallest in summer (16 +/- 12 and 6 +/- 5 mmHg). Daily variations of SBP and DBPs in spring (19 +/- 12 and 7 +/- 6 mmHg) and fall (20 +/- 13 and 9 +/- 8 mmHg) were between those of summer and winter. Our results indicate that not only averaged blood pressure but also variations of blood pressure in winter are larger than the other seasons, and suggest that these blood pressure variations participate in cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with end-stage renal diseases.

Zigzagged augmentation index in diabetes.

Although the patients with diabetic nephropathy suffered high cardiovascular risk, augmentation index (AI) in diabetic nephropathy has been poorly characterized. Cross-sectional studies were performed on 26 diabetic and 27 nondiabetic nephropathic patients. Home blood pressure was examined. In addition, blood pressure, pulse rate, and AI were measured in both supine and sitting positions. Patient backgrounds such as age, sex, sitting blood pressure, and pulse rate were similar between two groups. Circadian variations of home blood pressure were preserved in nondiabetic patients, but disappeared in diabetes. Changing from supine to sitting position induced greater decrements of systolic blood pressure (DeltaSBP -9 +/- 8 mmHg) and AI (DeltaAI -7 +/- 10) in the diabetic group than in nondiabetic patients (DeltaSBP -4 +/- 12 mmHg, DeltaAI -2 +/- 9). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that AI in a sitting position correlated positively to SBP and inversely to pulse rate. Of interest, AI in supine position related positively to age, the presence of diabetes and SBP, and inversely to pulse rate. The present data indicate autonomic dysfunction in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Furthermore, our findings provide the evidence that autonomic dysfunction elicits an inadequate physiological arterial contraction in response to postural change, thereby reducing AI that results in the fall of SBP. Finally, the present results suggest that AI in supine, but not sitting position, is suited for detecting cardiovascular risk in diabetes.

Cardio-ankle vascular index to screen cardiovascular diseases in patients with end-stage renal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases constitute major causes of death in patients with chronic kidney diseases. An increase in arterial stiffness predicts the presence of cardiovascular diseases; however, non-invasive arterial stiffness parameters such as pulse wave velocity are confounded by blood pressure. METHODS: A new arterial stiffness parameter beta for the arterial tree, cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), was measured. To examine the usefulness of CAVI to screen for the presence of cardiovascular diseases, cross-sectional studies were performed on 68 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. RESULTS: Stepwise regression analysis indicated that CAVI significantly correlated to age (beta=0.05, p<0.01) but not blood pressure. In addition, CAVI was higher in diabetics than non-diabetics (8.39+/-0.37 vs 7.63+/-0.57, p<0.05). Furthermore, CAVI was markedly elevated in patients with a history of cardiovascular diseases (8.69+/-0.23 vs 6.66+/-0.28, p<0.01). Analysis using the ROC curve has demonstrated that CAVI of 7.55 constitutes the cut-off value for the presence of cardiovascular diseases with both sensitivity and specificity of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that CAVI can be used as a screening test to detect for the presence of cardiovascular diseases in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Long-term follow-up of patients treated with a combination of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) both have advantages in the treatment of patients with renal failure. In CAPD, solute removal is sometimes insufficient in patients who have a relatively large muscle mass that produces high levels of creatinine. To compensate for this deficiency, frequent exchanges and large dialysate volumes are required. We previously reported that once-weekly HD helps CAPD patients who experience insufficient solute removal. In the present study, we followed, for more than 3 years, 9 CAPD patients who underwent additional weekly HD. Add-on HD therapy significantly increased the subjects' weekly peritoneal creatinine clearance to 45 +/- 3 L (mean +/- standard deviation); these values rose to more than 60 L over the course of the study. Our findings suggest that the combined use of CAPD and HD improves solute clearance in CAPD patients who are insufficiently dialyzed.