Do you want to be a urologist? Gender differences for medical student perception of urology.

INTRODUCTION: Gender inequality has been prevalent in the history of medicine, specifically within surgical specialties. Though there have been advances, urology has remained overwhelmingly male-dominant, with slow growth in female recruitment. This survey study evaluated whether gender-related differences in the perception of urology are present among future applicants that could account for gender disparity seen in recruitment. METHODS: An anonymized, online survey was distributed to medical students enrolled at the Max Rady College of Medicine during the 2022-2023 semester. Attracting and deterring survey statements were created using current literature to guide topics of interest. Participants rated each statement using a five-point Likert scale with optional supplemental qualitative responses. Likert ratings were compared using a Mann-U-Whitney calculation between self-identifying male and female participants. RESULTS: We received 90 responses over six weeks, achieving a response rate of 23%. Female students, compared to their male peers, were deterred by factors such as working in a male-dominated specialty (p<0.001) and working with primarily male patients (p<0.001). There were no significant gender-related differences for statements pertaining to interest in surgery, work-life balance, or exposure to urology. CONCLUSIONS: In this survey study, the biggest deterrents reported by female medical students to entering urology were working in a male-dominated profession and seeing primarily male patients. There were no significant gender-related differences for questions relating to interest in surgery, work-life balance, and exposure to urology.

Evaluating Patient Tolerability for Urological Procedures Under Conscious Sedation: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate patient-reported tolerability and surgical outcomes of urologic procedures with conscious sedation with or without local anesthesia. Administration of general or spinal anesthesia is associated with anesthetic-related complications, long wait times, and high costs. Using intravenous conscious sedation and/or local anesthesia is an emerging alternative for a myriad of urologic procedures. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from June-August 2021 at a tertiary care hospital. All procedures were completed using fentanyl, midazolam, or both with patient and procedural data recorded upon completion. Patients were telephoned 4-6 weeks post-procedure with a standardized patient tolerability questionnaire. A multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether a patient would opt for conscious sedation again as opposed to general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 196 procedures were performed by 6 attending urologists with an overall success rate of 98.5% and 0% intraoperative complication rate. At 4-6 weeks follow-up, 85.6% of patients reported they would opt for conscious sedation as opposed to general anesthesia. Predictors of opting for conscious sedation in the future were older age (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.049; P = .017) and surgeon perceived level of patient tolerability (OR: 2.124; P <.001, scored 1-10). CONCLUSION: Physician directed, nursing administered IV conscious sedation is a viable alternative for various urologic procedures and has minimal risk of perioperative complications.

Ultrasound-Only Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is Safe and Effective Compared to Fluoroscopy-Directed Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: Outcomes after ultrasound-only percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in which no fluoroscopy is used, are not well known. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of ultrasound-only and fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter database were reviewed for all patients who underwent PCNL at one academic center from 2015 to 2021. Primary outcomes were complications and stone-free rates (no residual fragments ≥3 mm). Results: Of the 141 patients who underwent ultrasound-only PCNL and 147 who underwent fluoroscopy-directed PCNL, there was no difference in complication rates (15% vs 16%, p = 0.87) or stone-free status (71% vs 65%, p = 0.72), respectively. After adjusting for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score, ultrasound-only PCNL was not associated with any increased odds of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-1.6, p = 0.41) or residual stone fragments ≥3 mm (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.9, p = 0.972) compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Ultrasound-only PCNL was associated with shorter operative time (median 99.5 vs 126 minutes, p < 0.001), and the use of ultrasound remained a significant predictor of short operative time (<100 minutes) after controlling for supine positioning, stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.29, p = 0.048). Patients in the ultrasound-only group were spared a mean radiation exposure dose of 10 mGy per procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasound-only PCNL is safe and achieves similar stone-free rates compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL with the added benefit of avoidance of radiation.

Single-Use Ureteroscopes Are Associated with Decreased Risk of Urinary Tract Infection After Ureteroscopy for Urolithiasis Compared to Reusable Ureteroscopes.

Objective: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common complication after ureteroscopy. Despite sterilization, there is evidence that reusable ureteroscopes can still harbor bacteria. Whether this property is associated with increased risk of UTI is unknown. The objective of this study was to compare rates of postoperative UTI after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis performed with single-use ureteroscopes vs reusable ureteroscopes. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent ureteroscopy for urolithiasis between June 2012 and March 2021. Outcomes were compared between those who underwent stone removal with single-use and reusable ureteroscopes. The primary endpoint was postoperative UTI. The secondary endpoints were intra-operative and postoperative outcomes, and health service utilization after surgery. Results: Of 991 patients identified, 500 (50.4%) underwent ureteroscopy with a single-use ureteroscope. Rates of postoperative UTI were lower in those undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal with a single-use ureteroscope compared to a reusable ureteroscope (6.5% vs 11.9%, p = 0.018). In multivariable analysis, use of a single-use ureteroscope was associated with lower odds of postoperative UTI compared to a reusable ureteroscope when adjusting for risk (odds ratio 0.37, p = 0.015). Use of a single-use ureteroscope was associated with a higher stone clearance rate compared to a reusable ureteroscope (90.0% vs 83.9%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in operative time, overall complication rate, readmission, or emergency department visits between two groups. Conclusion: Single-use ureteroscopes are associated with a twofold decreased risk of UTI and increased stone clearance rate after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis compared to reusable ureteroscopes.

Maternal family history of urolithiasis is associated with earlier age of onset of stone disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of detailed family history on the severity of disease and age of onset in patients with urolithiasis. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from a single institution between October 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed. Our primary endpoint was the number of patients experiencing at least one recurrent stone during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of 1566 patients analyzed, 603 (39%) reported at least one family member with a history of stones. The percentage of patients experiencing at least one recurrent stone event was higher in patients with a family history of stones (38%) compared to those without a family history of stones (28%) over a median follow-up period of 8 months (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the presence of any family history of urolithiasis increased risk of recurrent stone events (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, p < 0.001). The presence of both a first- and a second-degree relative with urolithiasis was associated with higher odds for a recurrent stone event (OR 2.17; p = 0.003) and a younger age of onset for stones, (OR 3.32; < 0.001). A maternal-side relative with stones conferred a higher odds ratio for younger age of first onset of stones (OR 2.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Any family history of kidney stone disease imparts an increased risk of recurrent stone event and an earlier age of onset for urolithiasis. The presence of both first- and second-degree relatives or a maternal-side relative with kidney stones may be a predictor for an earlier age of onset for urolithiasis.

Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in patients with extended selection criteria.

INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been limited to highly selected patients. The objective of our study was to compare complication and stone-free rates after ambulatory PCNL in standard selection criteria vs. extended criteria patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospective data on all patients who underwent ambulatory PCNL at one academic center from 2007-2018. Extended criteria patients were defined as one or more of: age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >2, bilateral stones, solitary kidney, transplant kidney, complete staghorn calculi, stone burden >40 mm, multiple tracts, or prior nephrostomy tubes/stents. Primary outcomes were complication rates (Clavien-Dindo classification) and stone-free rates. RESULTS: We identified 118 patients, of which 92 (78%) met extended criteria. Mean BMI was 31 kg/m2 and 45% were ASA 3 or higher. Mean sum maximum stone diameter was 24 mm. Multiple stones were present in 25%, bilateral stones in 7%, and complete staghorn stones in 4% of patients. There was no difference in complication (12% vs. 18%, p=0.56), emergency department visit (12% vs. 18%, p=0.56), or re-admission (4% vs. 5%, p=1) rates between standard and extended criteria patients, respectively. Of the complications, 85% were Clavien-Dindo grade 1. Stone-free rates were not different between standard (84%) and extended (83%) criteria patients (p=1). No extended criteria variables were associated with complications in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Complication and stone-free rates were not different between standard and extended selection criteria patients undergoing ambulatory PCNL. This data indicates that many of the preoperative patient and stone factors that have previously been used as exclusion criteria for ambulatory PCNL are not strictly necessary.

Association of vesicoureteral reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: A population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Practitioners have anecdotally hinted at a possible association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We sought to identify an association in diagnosis between GERD and VUR using a population-based dataset in a well-defined geographic area covered by a single-payer healthcare system. METHODS: A retrospective review of individuals aged 0-16 years registered in the Nova Scotia Medical Service Insurance database from January 1997 to December 2012 was completed. Presence of GERD and VUR were ascertained based on billing codes. The baseline prevalence of GERD and VUR was calculated for this population for the same time period. Proportions of VUR patients with and without GERD were compared. The risk of being diagnosed with VUR in patients with GERD controlling for sex was calculated. RESULTS: Of 404 300 patients identified, 6.6% had a diagnosis of GERD (n=27 092), 0.33% had a diagnosis of VUR (n=1348), and 0.08% were diagnosed with both (n=327). Among patients with VUR, the prevalence of GERD was 24.3% compared to 6.6% in patients without VUR (p<0.0001). Among patients with GERD, the prevalence of VUR was 1.2% compared to 0.27% in patients without (p<0.0001). The risk of being diagnosed with VUR was higher in the presence of GERD (odds ratio [OR] 4.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.96-5.09; p<0.0001), irrespective of sex. CONCLUSIONS: The odds of being diagnosed with VUR is more than 4.5 times higher in an individual with GERD. The clinical significance of this association remains to be explored.

Increased risk of new persistent opioid use in pediatric and young adult patients with kidney stones.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescents and young adults are a vulnerable patient population for development of substance use disorder. However, the long-term impact of opioid prescribing in young adult patients with renal colic is not known. Our objective was to describe rates of opioid prescription and identify risk factors for persistent opioid use in patients age 25 years or younger with renal colic from kidney stones. METHODS: Using previously validated, linked administrative databases, we performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of opioid-naive patients age 25 years or younger with renal colic between July 1, 2013 and September 30, 2017 in Ontario. All family practitioner, urgent care, and specialist visits in the province were captured. Our primary outcome was persistent opioid use, defined as filling a prescription for an opioid between 91 and 180 days after initial visit. Ontario uses a narcotic monitoring system, which captures all opioids dispensed in the province. RESULTS: Of the 6962 patients identified, 56% were prescribed an opioid at presentation and 34% of those were dispensed more than 200 oral morphine equivalents. There was persistent opioid use in 313 (8.1%) patients who filled an initial opioid prescription. In adjusted analysis, those prescribed an opioid initially had a significantly higher risk of persistent opioid use (odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-2.29) and opioid overdose (OR 3.45; 1.08-11.04). There was a dose-dependent increase in risk of persistent opioid use with escalating initial opioid dose. History of mental illness (OR 1.32; 1.02-1.71) and need for surgery (OR 1.71; 1.24-2.34) were also associated with persistent opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with kidney stones age 25 years or younger, filling an opioid prescription after presentation is associated with an increased risk of persistent opioid use 3-6 months later and a higher risk of serious long-term complications, such as opioid overdose.

Persistent Opioid Use Among Patients with Urolithiasis: A Population based Study.

BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis can result in acute, short-lived pain for which opioids are often prescribed. The risk of persistent opioid use following an initial presentation for urolithiasis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe rates of opioid prescription and identify risk factors for persistent opioid use among patients with urolithiasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a population-based study of all patients diagnosed with urolithiasis in Ontario between 2013 and 2017 using administrative databases. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was persistent opioid use, defined as dispensing of opioids between 91 and 180 d after presentation. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 101 896 previously opioid-naïve patients, 66% were prescribed opioids at diagnosis and 41% of those were dispensed more than 200 oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). For those patients prescribed opioids, 9% had continued use. In adjusted analysis, the number of health care visits and having a stone intervention were associated with a higher risk of persistent opioid use (p< 0.0001). Total OME dispensed at presentation was highly associated with persistent use: for >300 OME the odds ratio (OR) was 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.79). Among those who had an intervention, the number and type of procedure were also associated with persistent use: the OR for shockwave lithotripsy compared to ureteroscopy was 1.65 (95% CI 1.42-1.92). This study is limited by the accuracy of the diagnostic and procedural administrative codes available. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of urolithiasis patients were prescribed opioids and 9% of previously opioid-naïve patients exhibited persistent opioid use 91-180 d after their initial urolithiasis visit. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study we found that 9% of patients prescribed opioids at presentation for kidney stones filled an additional prescription 3-6 mo later. Risk factors for this continued use included a higher dose of opioids prescribed in the initial period and the type of kidney stone surgery.

Anesthetic technique and oncological outcomes in urology: A clinical practice review.

INTRODUCTION: There is increasing awareness that different anesthetic and analgesic techniques may impact outcomes after oncological surgery, generally through modifying effects on the immune system but potentially via other mechanisms including mitigating the surgical stress response. This narrative review aims to summarize the mechanisms underlying the effect of perioperative factors on oncological outcomes, with an emphasis on the available urologic literature. METHODS: Literature on anesthetic technique (i.e., general vs. regional) and oncological outcomes were reviewed with a particular focus on urological studies. RESULTS: In prostate cancer surgery, the risk of mortality has been reported to be reduced with the use of regional (i.e., neuraxial) anesthesia, but there was no association between anesthetic technique and progression-free or biochemical recurrence-free survival. In nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, regional anesthesia has been associated with lower recurrence rates and longer time to recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumor. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the role of regional anesthesia to improve oncoimmunological responses after surgery, potentially through decreased use of volatile anesthetics and opioids, decreased activation of the surgical stress response, and a direct local anesthetic-mediated anti-inflammatory effect. Available urological literature suggests an association of anesthetic type and outcomes for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and prostate cancer surgeries but the evidence is limited. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate the relationship between anesthetic technique and urologic oncological outcomes.

Evaluation of inter-professional communication and leadership skills among graduating Canadian urology residents.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of developing inter-professional communication and leadership skills among residents is well-recognized; however, formal tools to assess these skills are lacking. The goal of our study was to assess the leader and communicator roles in graduating urology residents using a validated self-assessment form developed for business students that focuses on inter-professional skills. METHODS: Chief residents (n=36) were evaluated with surveys of communication and leadership skills. The same surveys were administered through email to the residents' program directors (PDs). Resident self-assessment and PD assessment were compared using paired and non-paired t-tests. RESULTS: Graduating urology residents' self-assessment of their communication and leadership skills did not differ from assessments made by their PDs (77.6 vs. 74.4%; p=0.19); however, there were outlier candidates in whom PD assessment differed substantially from self-assessment on both surveys. Graduating urology residents scored themselves higher on self-awareness (82.6 vs. 77%; p= 0.05) and lower on stress management (67.7 vs. 77%; p= 0.01) compared to their PDs. Resident self-assessment scores were similar to business students on both communication and leadership surveys. Limitations were the small sample size and lack of survey evaluation by those surveyed. CONCLUSIONS: Graduating urology residents' self-assessment of their own communication and leadership skills did not differ greatly from assessment by their PDs or a sample of business students. Comparison of self-assessment evaluations and evaluations by PDs allowed us to identify outliers in whom self-assessment and PD-assessment markedly differed, which may allow for more focused and meaningful feedback.

Growth rates and outcomes of observed large renal masses.

INTRODUCTION: The natural history of small renal masses has been well defined, leading to the recommendation of active surveillance in some patients with limited life expectancy. However, this information is less clear for large renal masses (LRM), leading to ambiguity for management in the older, comorbid patient. The objective of this study was to define the natural history, including the growth rate and metastatic risk, of LRM in order to better counsel patients regarding active surveillance. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with solid renal masses >4 cm that had repeated imaging identified from an institutional imaging database. Patient comorbidities and outcomes were obtained through retrospective chart analysis. Outcomes assessed included tumour growth and metastatic rates, as well as cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) usimg Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: We identified 69 patients between 2005 and 2016 who met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at study entry was 75.5 years; mean tumour maximal dimension at study entry was 5.6 cm. CSS was 83% and OS 63% for patients presenting without metastasis, with a mean followup of 57.5 months. The mean growth rate of those that developed metastasis during followup (n=15) was 0.98 cm/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-1.63) as compared to those that did not develop metastasis (n=46), with a growth rate of 0.67 cm/year (95% CI 0.34-1) (non-significant). Seven patients had evidence of metastasis at the baseline imaging of their LRM and had subsequent growth rate of 1.47 cm/year (95% CI 0.37-2.57) (non-significant) CONCLUSIONS: Compared to small renal masses, LRM are associated with higher metastasis rates and lower CSS and more rapid growth rates. Selection criteria for recommending observation of LRM in older, comorbid patients should be more conservative than for small renal masses.

The X-Y factor: Females and males with urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome present distinct clinical phenotypes.

INTRODUCTION: Urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) in females is often attributed to the bladder (interstitial cystitis/ bladder pain syndrome), while UCPPS in males is often attributed to the prostate (chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome). However, there is increasing awareness that bladder pain plays a role in both males and females and the degree of overlap of clinical characteristics in males and females with UCPPS is not well known. Our objective was to compare clinical phenotypes of females and males with UCPPS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single-centre patient population presenting between 1998 and 2016 to our UCPPS clinic. Demographics, symptom scores, pain scales, retrospectively described clinical UPOINT (urinary, psychosocial, organ-specific, infection, neurogenic, and tenderness) scoring, and presence of comorbid medical conditions were compared between females and males using comparative analyses. RESULTS: We identified 2007 subjects (1523 males, 484 females) with UCPPS. Females had increased prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (25% vs. 11.2%), chronic fatigue syndrome (13.6% vs. 1.6%), fibromyalgia (16.9% vs. 1.6%), drug allergies (56.6% vs. 13.5%), diabetes (20.2% vs. 3.9%), depression (31% vs. 18.4%), and alcohol use (44.2% vs. 10.8%) compared to males with UCPPS (all p<0.001). In respect to UPOINT domains, females had a higher "total" (3.2 vs. 2.4), "urinary" (92.8% vs. 67.6%), "organ-specific" (90.1% vs. 51.4%), and "neurogenic" (44.7% vs. 30%) prevalence compared to males (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Females with UCPPS have greater prevalence of systemic disorders/symptoms and worse urinary symptoms than males with UCPPS. These findings demonstrate that females and males with UCPPS have distinct and different clinical phenotypes.

Attitudes of graduating Canadian urology residents on the job market: Is it getting better or are we just spinning our wheels?

INTRODUCTION: There has been increasing awareness of employment difficulties for physicians, especially surgeons, in Canada over the past few years. Our objective was to elucidate the attitudes and experiences of graduating Canadian urology residents in obtaining employment. METHODS: We surveyed four separate cohorts of graduating urology residents in 2010, 2011, 2016, and 2017. Responses from the 2010 and 2011 cohorts were combined and compared to the combined results of the 2016 and 2017 cohorts. Mean Likert responses were compared using unpaired t-tests. An agreement score was created for those responding with "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 126 surveys were administered with a 100% response rate. The job market was rated as poor or very poor by 64.9% and 58.4% of graduates in 2010/2011 and 2016/2017, respectively (p=0.67). Lack of resources was identified as the biggest barrier to improved employment in both cohorts. Networking at meetings and staff urologists at their institution were the most important factors aiding employment identified by both cohorts. The ideal practice was academic or academically associated community practices in a large urban area, with 5-10 partners for both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of graduating urology residents viewed the job market as poor or very poor and this did not change over a six-year period. It is unclear how much personal preference for location and practice type drove the somewhat negative outlook of employment opportunities, as the majority of residents were seeking large urban, academic, or academically associated community practices in competitive locations.

Spinal Anesthesia is Associated with Lower Recurrence Rates after Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether anesthetic type (general vs spinal) would influence cancer recurrence following transurethral resection of bladder tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional ethics board approval we examined the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent transurethral bladder tumor resection for nonmuscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer between 2011 and 2013 at a single tertiary care center. Followup information was gathered on all patients in December 2016. The time to first cancer recurrence and the incidence of cancer recurrence were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients underwent 1 or more transurethral bladder tumor resections between 2011 and 2013. Of the 231 patients 135 received spinal anesthesia and 96 received general anesthesia. On univariable analysis the 135 patients who received spinal anesthesia had a longer median time to recurrence than the 96 who received general anesthesia (42.1 vs 17.2 months, p = 0.014). As anticipated, adjuvant therapies and risk category were associated with recurrence rates (p = 0.003 and 0.042, respectively). On multivariable analyses incorporating a priori variables of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer risk stratification and postoperative therapies the patients who received general anesthesia had a higher incidence of recurrence (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.14-3.74, p = 0.017) and an earlier time to recurrence (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.19, p = 0.008) than those who received spinal anesthesia. Anesthetic type was not associated with cancer progression or overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received spinal anesthesia had a lower incidence of recurrence and a delayed time to recurrence following transurethral bladder tumor resection for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. These findings should prompt large-scale prospective studies to confirm this association.