Encouraging maternal health service utilization: an evaluation of the Bangladesh voucher program.

With the ultimate goal of reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, many countries have recently adopted innovative financing mechanisms to encourage the use of professional maternal health services. The current study evaluates one such initiative - a pilot voucher program in Bangladesh. The program provides poor women with cash incentives and free access to antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care, as well as cash incentives for providers to offer these services. We conducted a household survey of 2208 women who delivered in the 6 months before the survey (conducted in 2009) in 16 intervention and 16 matched comparison sub-districts. Probit and linear regressions are used to analyze the effects of residing in voucher sub-districts on the use of professional maternal health services and associated out-of-pocket expenditures. Using information on birth history, we conducted sensitivity analyses employing difference-in-differences methods, comparing women's reported births before and after the program's initiation in the intervention and comparison sub-districts. We found that the program significantly increased the use of antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care with qualified providers. Compared to women in matched comparison sub-districts, women in intervention areas had a 46.4 percentage point higher probability of using a qualified provider and 13.6 percentage point higher probability of institutional delivery. They also paid approximately Taka 640 (US$ 9.43) less for maternal health services, equivalent to 64% of the sample's average monthly household expenditure per capita. No significant effect of vouchers was found on the rate of Cesarean section. Our findings therefore support voucher program expansion targeting the economically disadvantaged to improve the use of priority health services. The Bangladesh voucher program is a useful example for other developing countries interested in improving maternal health service utilization.

Vouchers as demand side financing instruments for health care: a review of the Bangladesh maternal voucher scheme.

OBJECTIVES: Demand side financing (DSF) mechanisms transfer purchasing power to specified groups for defined goods and services in order to increase access to specified services. This is an important innovation in health care systems where access remains poor despite substantial subsidies towards the supply side. In Bangladesh, a maternal health DSF pilot in 33 sub-districts was launched in 2007. We report the results of a rapid review of this scheme undertaken during 2008 after 1 year of its setup. METHODS: Quantitative data collected by DSF committees, facilities and national information systems were assessed alongside qualitative data, i.e. key informant interviews and focus group discussions with beneficiaries and health service providers on the operation of the scheme in 6 sub-districts. RESULTS: The scheme provides vouchers to women distributed by health workers that entitle mainly poor women to receive skilled care at home or a facility and also provide payments for transport and food. After initial setbacks voucher distribution rose quickly. The data also suggest that the rise in facility based delivery appeared to be more rapid in DSF than in other non-DSF areas, although the methods do not allow for a strict causal attribution as there might be co-founding effects. Fears that the financial incentives for surgical delivery would lead to an over emphasis on Caesarean section appear to be unfounded although the trends need further monitoring. DSF provides substantial additional funding to facilities but remains complex to administer, requiring a parallel administrative mechanism putting additional work burden on the health workers. There is little evidence that the mechanism encourages competition due to the limited provision of health care services. CONCLUSIONS: The main question outstanding is whether the achievements of the DSF scheme could be achieved more efficiently by adapting the regular government funding rather than creating an entirely new mechanism. Also, improving the quality of health care services cannot be expected by the DSF mechanism alone within an environment lacking the pre-requirements for competition. Quality assurance mechanisms need to be put in place. A large-scale impact evaluation is currently underway.

Projecting the cost of essential services in Bangladesh.

Utilizing a study of the costs of providing essential services in rural areas in Bangladesh projections of the cost of expanding services to the entire rural population are derived. These estimates are based on the current system of primary care, the demographic structure of the population and normatives for desired utilization. Scenarios make use of known demographic characteristics of average rural areas together with information on disease prevalence. The estimates highlight a number of difficulties involved in deriving costs and in comparing the cost-effectiveness of service provision. The integrated nature of much primary care, both in terms of the technical exploitation of joint costs and clinical diagnostic and treatment protocols, means that treating services in isolation is likely to lead to inexact estimates of service cost. The context of any costs derived is required in order to make comparisons.

Do essential service packages benefit the poor? Preliminary evidence from Bangladesh.

In 1998 Bangladesh began a sector wide approach (SWAp) to the extension of health care to vulnerable groups in the country. The central feature of this approach is the funding of an essential service package (ESP) emphasizing maternal care, certain communicable diseases and child health. This study examines the way in which public sector expenditures are distributed by comparing the actual beneficiaries of spending with the target groups identified by the sector strategy. It finds that while the ESP is helping to target resources at priority services, considerable barriers to access by vulnerable groups persist. The study suggests a number of issues that need to be addressed to improve the performance of the programme. First, improved targeting requires greater emphasis on the process of access to key services. Secondly, improving the efficiency of service provision at primary level is a key element to increasing access, since individual primary providers are often not ready to provide the standard of care required by the ESP approach to services. Finally, the system of financial control and management needs to be modified in order to make allocations more responsive to the priorities determined by the SWAp. Given the widespread adoption of the ESP approach to health care, the paper also suggests a wider research agenda that examines its impact in other countries and evaluates this worldwide experiment in health service prioritization.