The Prevalence of Migraine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suffer from a wide range of comorbidities such as migraine. In studies, the prevalence of migraine in cases with IBD was reported differently. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the pooled prevalence of migraine in IBD cases. Methods: Two researchers independently and systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and google scholar. They also searched the gray literature including references of the included studies and conference abstracts which were published up to May 2021. Cross-sectional studies were included. Results: The literature search revealed 840 articles, and after deleting duplicates, 650 remained. For the meta-analysis, 10 studies were included. Totally, 62,554 patients were evaluated. The pooled prevalence of migraine in patients with IBD was 19% (95% CI: 15-22%). The pooled prevalence of migraine in ulcerative colitis (UC) was 10% (95% CI: 4-15%) (I2 = 99.8%, P < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of migraine in the Crohn's disease (CD) group was 24% (95% CI: 17-30%) (I2 = 98.8%, P < 0.001). The pooled odds of developing migraine in IBD cases was 1.51 (95% CI: 1-2.27) (I2 = 90.8%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The result of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of migraine in patients with IBD was 19% (95% CI: 15-22%).

Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) are common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a minimally invasive treatment which is considered to be effective for patients who suffer from LUTS symptoms. In previous studies, the endpoints of treatment reported differently. So, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate pooled efficacy of PTNS based on different assessment methods. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and google scholar. We also searched the gray literature including references of the included studies, and conference abstracts which were published up to May 2021. The search strategy included the MeSH and text words as (((Tibial Nerves) OR Posterior Tibial Nerve) OR (Posterior Tibial Nerves) OR (Medial Plantar Nerves) OR (Medial Plantar Nerve) OR (tibial Nerve Stimulation) OR (Trans-Cutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation) OR (Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation) OR (Cutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation) AND ((Multiple Sclerosis OR Sclerosis, Multiple) OR Sclerosis, Disseminated) OR Disseminated Sclerosis) OR MS (Multiple Sclerosis)) OR Multiple Sclerosis, Acute Fulminating).Two independent researchers independently evaluated the articles. RESULTS: We found 2430 articles by literature search, after deleting duplicates 2027 remained. Eight articles remained for meta-analysis The pooled SMD of post voiding residual (PVR) (post-treatment - pre-treatment) was -0.75 (95%CI:-0.93, -0.56)(I2=0, p = 0.67). The pooled SMD of voiding volume (post-treatment - pre-treatment) was 1.21 (95% CI:0.94-1.49) (I2:0%, p = 0.4). The pooled SMD of nocturia (post-treatment - pre-treatment) was -1.10 (95% CI:-1.33, -0.87) (I2:86.4%, p<0.001). The pooled SMD of leakage per day (post-treatment - pre-treatment) was -0.69 (95% CI:-0.93, -0.45) (I2:84.3%, p<0.001). The pooled frequency of responders was 66%(95% CI:59%-73%)(I2:0). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that PTNS in effective in treating LUTS in patients with MS.

COVID-19 susceptibility and outcomes among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), clinical features and outcome among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase from December 1, 2019, to July 2, 2021. The gray literature including the references of original studies, review studies, conference abstracts, and WHO COVID-19 database was also searched. We included any type of studies that reported NMOSD patients with COVID-19, prevalence of COVID-19 among NMOSD patients or the infection outcome (hospitalization, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, or mortality). RESULTS: Out of 540 records, a total of 23 studies (19 published articles and 4 conference abstracts) including 112 NMOSD patients with COVID-19 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies reporting risk of COVID-19 and nine studies on outcome were included in a quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.001%-0.030%; I2 = 92%, p< 0.001), with hospitalization of 33.7% (95% CI: 23.3-44.8%; I2 = 9.1%, p = 0.360) with 52.9% on rituximab treatment. ICU admission was 15.4% (95% CI: 7.6%-24.7%; I2 = 20.7%, p = 0.272) and mortality was 3.3% (95% CI: 0-9.7%; I2 = 21.3%, p = 0.253). Thirty-eight patients (48.7%) reported at least one comorbidity. The mean age of the included patients was 40.8 (10.63) years, female/male ratio was 3.35:1. The most common COVID-19 symptom was fever (54.5%), followed by fatigue/asthenia (42.9%), headache (41.6%), and cough (40.3%). Four patients developed neurological worsening. The Begg's and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSION: The analysis suggests that comorbidity and treatment with rituximab may be risk factors for COVID-19 infection in NMOSD patients.

Prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) is increasing world-wide. Iran is not exception. As the prevalence reported differently in various provinces, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate pooled prevalence of MS in Iran. METHODS: Two researchers systematically searched Scientific Information Database (SID), PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and google scholar. They also searched references of the included studies, and conference abstracts which were published up to April 2021. The search strategy included the MeSH and text words as ((((Multiple Sclerosis OR Sclerosis, Multiple) OR Sclerosis, Disseminated) OR Dis-seminated Sclerosis) OR MS (Multiple Sclerosis)) OR Multiple Sclerosis, Acute Fulminating)) AND (prevalence OR prevalences OR period prevalence OR prevalence, period OR point prevalence OR point prevalences OR prevalence, point) AND (Iran OR Islamic Republic of Iran)))). RESULTS: The literature search revealed 2817 articles, after deleting duplicates 2184 remained. For the systematic review, 34 studies were included. The prevalence is highest in Tehran and lowest in Khuzestan and Sistan-Baluchestan provinces. The pooled prevalence was 0.001 (95% CI: 0.000-0.001) (I2=0, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the pooled prevalence of MS in Iran is 100 in 100,000 which is high. The prevalence in provinces increases dramatically.