Comparing duloxetine and pregabalin for treatment of pain and depression in women with fibromyalgia: an open-label randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine and pregabalin are among the most widely used medications in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FM). OBJECTIVES: To add to the very few lines of evidence that exist on the comparative safety and efficacy of these two medications. METHODS: In this open-label randomized clinical trial, outpatient women, who were diagnosed with FM based on American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria, and had an age range of 18-65 years old were assigned to either duloxetine 30-60 mg or pregabalin 75-150 mg per day for 4 weeks. Patients were excluded in cases of having used duloxetine, pregabalin, gabapentin, or antidepressants within 12 weeks prior to the study, having had a history of comorbid medical conditions that could provoke chronic pain, or having had comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders, except for major depressive/anxiety disorders. Primary outcomes were between-group differences in mean score changes from baseline to end point for Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II. Secondary outcomes were the same statistical estimates, but for Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised and 12-Item Short Form Survey. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test were the main methods of analysis. ( www.irct.ir ; IRCT2016030626935N1). RESULTS: Among all the scales, only WPI scores improved with a statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms, favoring duloxetine (Mean difference in score change - 2.32, 95% CI, -4.46 to - 0.18; p = 0.034; Cohen's d 0.53 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.02). Drop out rate and cumulative incidence of nausea was significantly higher in the duloxetine arm compared to the pregabalin arm. CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence on higher efficacy of duloxetine compared to pregabalin for the treatment of pain in patients with fibromyalgia. Future comprehensive pragmatic clinical trials are warranted.

Prevalence of Hypertension and Obesity-related Hypertension in Urban School-aged Children in Rasht.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is a worldwide health concern. Complications of hypertension not only affect adult patients, but also involve children. Given the importance of assessing children with hypertension in order to decrease adulthood complications, we aimed to assess the prevalence of hypertension in urban school-aged children in Rasht, Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2072 school-aged children in Rasht, Iran, from January 2013 to December 2015. Inclusion criteria were age between 7 and 17 years and residence and attending school in the urban area of Rasht. RESULTS: Overall, 205 (9.9%) and 144 (6.9%) of the participants were hypertensive and prehypertensive, respectively. The mean systolic blood pressure was 124.54 ± 11.86 mm Hg in the children. The prevalence of obesity in the children was 3.5%. Comparing the normal, prehypertensive, and hypertensive groups, there was a significantly increasing trend regarding age, height, weight, and body mass index associated with higher blood pressure categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a high rate of hypertension among school-aged children in Rasht. Hypertensive children tended to be have a higher body mass index than the prehypertensive and normal-weight participants. Case identification and early assessment of these children is recommended.