Does pre-transplantation antireflux surgery eliminate post-renal transplantation pyelonephritis in children?

PURPOSE: Antireflux surgery for VUR before renal transplantation decreases the risk of post-kidney transplant UTI in pediatric patients with primary vesicoureteral reflux. We studied the risk of post-kidney transplant UTI in patients with or without surgical correction of VUR before transplantation compared to patients without VUR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 12 patients who had VUR corrected before transplantation (group 1) to 17 patients with VUR who did not undergo antireflux surgery before transplantation (group 2) and 36 patients undergoing renal transplantation without VUR (group 3). A total of 10 patients in group 1 (83.3%) and 10 in group 2 (58.8%) had high grade VUR. RESULTS: Eight patients in group 1 (66.7%), 6 in group 2 (35.3%) and 33 in group 3 (91.7%) remained free of febrile UTI during followup (p = 0.00). Among patients with high grade VUR 6 in group 1 and 1 in group 2 remained UTI-free (p = 0.02). A total of 33 patients in the control group (91.7%) remained free of febrile UTI, an incidence that was significantly lower compared to group 1 (p = 0.03) and group 2 (p = 0.00). Of the patients with high grade VUR 3 in group 1 (30%) and 4 in group 2 (40%) experienced recurrent febrile UTIs (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Even after surgical correction of VUR before transplantation the frequency of febrile UTI remained higher than that in kidney transplant recipients without VUR. In cases of high grade VUR reimplantation before renal transplantation decreased the rate of febrile UTI but it was still higher than the level of risk in the control group.

Ureteroscopic management of urological complications after renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, safety and efficacy of diagnostic and therapeutic ureteroscopy in renal allograft ureters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed 1560 consecutive renal allografts performed between June 1989 and February 2002. A total of 28 patients (1.8%) had indications for an endoscopic procedure on the allograft ureter, as follows: obstructive ureteral calculi with a history of failed extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, n=6; suspected ureteral stricture, n=3; upwardly migrated ureteral stents, n=9; and ureteral stricture at the ureteroneocystostomy site, n=10. Ureters were anastomosed to the bladder using the Leadbetter-Politano and Lich-Gregoire methods in six and 22 cases, respectively. Ureteroscopies were performed with a semi-rigid 9.8 F Wolf ureteroscope. RESULTS: Identification of the ureteral orifice and insertion of a guide-wire into it was successful in 19 cases (68%). If we exclude the 10 patients with ureteral stricture, ureteroscopy was successful in 13/18 cases (72%). Four ureteral calculi (67%) were removed with the ureteroscope. Seven out of nine migrated stents (78%) were retrieved. Four patients with ureteral stricture at the ureteroneocystostomy site (40%) underwent successful ureteral dilatation and double-J ureteral catheters were also inserted. Diagnostic ureteroscopy was successful in all cases. Two complications (one urinary leakage and one symptomatic urinary tract infection) occurred and were managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral endoscopy is a safe and effective method for the management of urological complications after renal transplantation. This procedure can be considered the first choice, in preference to percutaneous and antegrade modalities.

Outcome of Kaposi's sarcoma and graft following discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Owing to the use of immunosuppressive drugs, renal transplant recipients are at risk for malignancies including Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Following the diagnosis, physicians tend to decrease the doses of immunosuppressive drugs to lower tumor progression rate. On the other hand, those who receive lower doses of immunosuppressive drugs are at a higher risk for acute rejection. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of KS on renal allografts following discontinuation or decrease in the doses of drugs. METHODS: Since 1984, 14 (nine men and five women) among 2000 cases of renal transplantation have been diagnosed as KS. In 11 patients, cyclosporine was completely discontinued, the dosage was decreased to half of the initial dose in other cases. Except one case, we discontinued either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: During 57 months of follow-up on average, the serum creatinine level remained normal in 10 but increased in four cases. Kidney function deteriorated in two of these four patients at the beginning of study. Three patients died with normal serum creatinine levels. Discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs caused complete remission of KS in all patients except one who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of immunosuppressants following the diagnosis of KS caused complete remission of this cancer in almost all patients and seemed to be relatively safe for kidney graft function.

A comparison between laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes, complications, and hospital stay in laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2002 to February 2003, 69 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) were assigned into two groups. Thirty-seven patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 32 underwent open surgical pyeloplasty. Clinical symptoms were assessed before and after surgery, subjectively. Radiological assessment was also done three months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 3.2 hours and 2.2 hours in laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty groups, respectively. Intraoperative bleeding was trivial in both groups and no complication or conversion to open surgery occurred. Postoperative complication rates were 24% and 6% in laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty groups, respectively. Mean hospital stay was similar (6.2 days) in the two groups. Mean follow-up was 16.5 months versus 11.4 months. Clinical and radiological success rates were 89% and 83.8% for laparoscopy group versus 96.5% and 87% for open pyeloplasty group. Due to recurrence of stricture, repeated surgery was performed in 4 patients of laparoscopy and 1 of open pyeloplasty groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a less invasive method with less pain, cosmetic advantages, no long incision, and outcome comparable with open surgery. Hospital stay is also not longer than that in open surgeries. Hence, laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be a substitute for skilled surgeons.