Preventive Effects of Nicorandil and Atorvastatin in Contrastinduced Nephropathy in Patients with Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Angiography: A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTIONS: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important issue in patients with cardiovascular disorders undergoing angiography, especially in patients with kidney failure. The purpose of the present study was to compare the preventive effects of nicorandil and atorvastatin on the incidence of CIN in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: In this clinical trial study, 270 patients with renal insufficiency nominated for angiographic procedures were randomly divided into three groups (each group, n = 90): hydration group (1000 mL saline), hydration + atorvastatin group (80 mg/d for 3 days), and hydration + nicorandil group (10 mg 3 times/d for 3 days). Serum creatinine (Cr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels as well as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were evaluated before and 72 hours after the intervention. RESULTS: At the end of the study, serum Cr and BUN levels in all three groups showed a significant increase compared to the pre-intervention levels, which were significantly higher in the control group than the other two groups. The amount of GFR also significantly decreased following the intervention in all three groups, with the decline being significantly more pronounced in the control group than in other two groups. No significant differences were found in serum concentrations of Cr and BUN as well as GFR levels between nicorandil and atorvastatin groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Nicorandil and atorvastatin administration showed preventive effects on CIN in CKD patients undergoing angiography, but there was no significant difference between the two drugs.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7348.

Aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) in admission as a reliable predictor of mortality in COPD patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The role of leukocytes and systemic inflammation indicators in predicting the severity and mortality of inflammatory diseases has been well reported, such as the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil/lymphocyte*platelet ratio (NLPR), derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), as well as systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and systemic inflammation index (SII). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prognostic role of systemic inflammatory indicators in the mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective study included 169 COPD patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were obtained from the patients' electronic records. The ability of systemic inflammation indeces to distinguish the severity of COVID-19 was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and survival probability was determined by the mean of Kaplan-Meier curves, with the endpoint being death. RESULTS: ROC curves showed that the AUD level was significant for WBC, MLR, SIRI, and AISI. Interestingly, Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that survival was lower with higher MLR (HR = 2.022, 95% CI = 1.030 to 3.968, P < 0.05) and AISI (HR = 2.010, 95% CI = 1.048 to 3.855, P < 0.05) values. However, the multivariate Cox regression model showed that only AISI was significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION: AISI in COPD patients with COVID-19 was a reliable predictor of mortality.

Serum Levels of Sirtuin-1 in Patients with Lung Cancer and its Association with Karnofsky Performance Status.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. There are conflicting results regarding the role of sirtuin-1 in cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the serum sirtuin-1 levels in patients with lung cancer and its relationship with the quality of life based on Karnofsky performance statue scale (KPS). METHODS: Serum sirtuin-1 levels were measured in 30 male patients with lung cancer and 50 healthy men. The two groups were matched for age. The difference between the serum levels of sirtuin-1 between the two groups and its relationship with KPS and other clinical parameters were evaluated. Data were analyzed by independent t-test and Pearson correlation, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Sirtuin-1 levels were significantly lower in the patients in comparison with healthy subjects (P < 0.001). There was also a significant relationship between the serum level of sirtuin-1 with KPS (P < 0.001, r = 0.634), arterial oxygen saturation (P < 0.01, r = 0.470), and smoking history (P < 0.01, r = -0.330). In addition, the serum sirtuin-1 levels were significantly lower in adenocarcinoma than that in squamous cell carcinoma or small cell lung cancer (p < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The serum levels of sirtuin-1 were lower in patients with lung cancer. In addition, there was a significant correlation between serum levels of sirtuin-1 and KPS, O2 saturation, and smoking history. Further serological and histological studies seem to be necessary due to the existence of conflicting reports regarding sirtuin-1.