RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We use vernakalant, an intravenous anti-arrhythmic, to cardiovert paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) into sinus rhythm. It is a relatively atrium-selective, early-activating potassium and frequency-dependent sodium channel blocker with a half-life of 2 to 3 hours. Due to concerns regarding its safety profile, it is not Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy of intravenous vernakalant in cardioversion of paroxysmal AF and the safety of its use. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal AF who presented to the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) between 2015 and 2020 and received vernakalant for cardioversion were included. Patients did not receive vernakalant if they had any of the following: QTc > 440 ms, heart rate < 50 bpm, acute coronary syndrome within the last 30 days, second- and third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block in the absence of a pacemaker, severe aortic stenosis (AS), use of intravenous antiarrhythmics (class I and class III) within four hours of vernakalant infusion, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, and heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or NYHA IV class). The primary endpoint is conversion to sinus rhythm for at least one minute within 90 minutes of the start of the vernakalant infusion. The secondary endpoint included the presence of these side effects: bradycardia, QTc prolongation, AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, hypotension, taste alteration/dysgeusia, sneezing, nausea, vomiting, paresthesia, cardiogenic shock, or death. RESULTS: The study included 23 patients with paroxysmal AF (15 men, mean age 54 ± 14 years). Fourteen patients (61%) cardioverted to sinus rhythm within 90 minutes of the start of the Vernakalant infusion. Seven patients (30%) reverted to sinus rhythm within 15 minutes after the first infusion. After treatment with vernakalant, four patients (17%) developed sinus bradycardia, and four patients (17%) developed first-degree AV block. No patient had a QTc greater than 460 ms. None of the patients experienced sinus pauses, high-grade AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, hypotension, dysgeusia, sneezing, nausea, vomiting, paresthesia, cardiogenic shock, or death. CONCLUSION: Vernakalant had 61% efficacy in the rapid cardioversion of paroxysmal AF to sinus rhythm, was well tolerated, and had a low rate of adverse events in our study population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to chronic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Multiple devices were used for LAA closure, with the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) and Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) being the most commonly used in clinical practice. In August 2021, the FDA approved the use of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder. There is still a knowledge gap in the safety profile of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder device in comparison to the Watchman device. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety profile peri-procedure and post-procedure between the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder and Watchman devices. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAA closure using Watchman or Amulet devices from July 2015 to August 2020 at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints included peri-operative and post-procedural complications (thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, vascular access complications, pericardial effusion/tamponade, device positional complications and in-hospital death). RESULTS: The study included 37 patients (21 had Watchman devices, 16 had Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder devices, and 28 were men, mean age 76.57 ± 9.3 years). Seven patients developed post-procedural iatrogenic atrial septal defects (four in the Watchman group vs three in the Amulet group, p-value=0.982). Three patients developed pericardial effusion (one in the Watchman vs two in the Amulet group, p-value=0.394). Only one patient developed peri-device leak (one in the Watchman group vs none in the Amulet group, p-value=0.283). One device could not be deployed (one in the Amulet group vs none in the Watchman group, p-value=0.191). None of the patients developed in-hospital death, cardiac tamponade, device embolism, device thrombosis, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), cranial bleeding, or arrhythmias after the procedure. The rate of peri-operative complications was similar between both groups. Both groups displayed low rates of adverse events in the peri-operative and post-operative periods. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the safety profile of Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluders and Watchman devices. There was a low incidence of peri-operative and post-operative adverse events with the implanted devices.
RESUMO
Amyloid deposition in aortic tissue is associated with increased stiffness. We report a patient with ascending aortic aneurysm and chronic abdominal aortic dissection who had significant wild-type transthyretin amyloid deposition on surgical pathology. The patient did not have cardiac involvement on further workup.
