Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35078873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies show that family caregiver factors influence patient outcomes. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the association between family caregiver self-rated health, perception of preparedness and burden at the time of patient admission to home palliative care (HomePal) with downstream patient hospital utilisation and time to hospice enrolment and death. METHODS: Data for this cohort study (n=441) were drawn from a trial testing two models of HomePal. Caregiver self-rated health, preparedness (Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, CPS) and burden (Zarit-12) were measured at admission to HomePal. Caregivers were categorised as having good/very good/excellent or fair/poor health, scoring above or below the CPS median score (23), or having no/mild (0-10), moderate (11-20) or high (>20) burden. Proportional hazard competing risk models assessed the association between caregiver factors with hospital utilisation (emergency department visits, observation and inpatient stays). RESULTS: Patients whose caregivers reported poor health and low preparedness received more visits by home health aides and social workers, respectively (both, p<0.05). Adjusted models showed that worse caregiver health (HR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.92), p=0.01), low preparedness (HR: 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.94), p=0.01) and high burden (HR: 0.77 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.06), p=0.10) were associated with lower risk for hospital utilisation. There were no significant associations between caregiver factors with time to patient enrolment in hospice or death in adjusted models (both, p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Prospective studies are needed to understand how greater in-home supports for family caregivers with poor health could help achieve quality palliative care that aligns with families' priorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03694431; ClinicalTrials.gov.

2.
Clin Interv Aging ; 2(3): 327-35, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18044183

RESUMO

Vascular dementia is a common condition for which there are no effective approved pharmacological treatments available. Absence of effective treatments creates a difficult situation for those suffering from the disease, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. This review will address our current understanding of the mechanisms of nerve cell damage due to ischemia and summarize available clinical trial data on several commonly used compounds including memantine, donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, nimodipine, hydergine, nicergoline, CDP-choline, folic acid, as well as such nonpharmacological approaches as validation therapy.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Demência Vascular/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Neural/complicações , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/metabolismo , Inibidores da Colinesterase/uso terapêutico , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Demência Vascular/etiologia , Demência Vascular/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glutâmico/metabolismo , Humanos , Degeneração Neural/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Neural/etiologia , Degeneração Neural/metabolismo , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/farmacologia , Nootrópicos/farmacologia , Receptores de Glutamato/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Glutamato/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...