RATIONALE 301 study: tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a poor prognosis with median life expectancy of approximately 1 year. Overexpression of PD-L1 in tumor cells and PD-1 on tumor-infiltrating T cells has been associated with poorer prognosis, more advanced disease and higher recurrence rates in HCC. Monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 have demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors, including HCC. Tislelizumab, an investigational, humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody with high affinity and binding specificity for PD-1, has demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity in HCC. Here we describe a head-to-head Phase III study comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tislelizumab with sorafenib as first-line treatment in unresectable HCC.

Correction to: Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study.

Following publication of the original article [1], it was reported that the legend for Fig. 1 was incomplete. The complete figure legend is.

Risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma after treatment of basal cell carcinoma with vismodegib.

BACKGROUND: Vismodegib is a first-in-class agent targeting the hedgehog signaling pathway for treatment of patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and metastatic BCC. There have been concerns about the development of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients treated with this drug. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether treatment with vismodegib is associated with an increase in the risk of cutaneous SCC. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients treated with vismodegib as part of phase I and II clinical studies were compared with participants from the University of California, San Francisco, Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Cohort who received standard therapy for primary BCC. In total, 1675 patients were included in the analysis, and the development of SCC after vismodegib exposure was assessed. RESULTS: The use of vismodegib was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent development of SCC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-1.16). Covariates including age, sex, history of previous nonmelanoma skin cancer, and number of visits per year were significantly associated with the development of SCC. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of the study was that a historic control cohort was used as a comparator. CONCLUSIONS: Vismodegib was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent SCC when compared with standard surgical treatment of BCC.

Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study.

BACKGROUND: In the primary analysis of the ERIVANCE BCC trial, vismodegib, the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, showed objective response rates (ORRs) by independent review facility (IRF) of 30% and 43% in metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) and locally advanced BCC (laBCC), respectively. ORRs by investigator review were 45% (mBCC) and 60% (laBCC). Herein, we present long-term safety and final investigator-assessed efficacy results in patients with mBCC or laBCC. METHODS: One hundred four patients with measurable advanced BCC received oral vismodegib 150 mg once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was IRF-assessed ORR. Secondary end points included ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: At data cutoff (39 months after completion of accrual), 8 patients were receiving the study drug (69 patients in survival follow-up). Investigator-assessed ORR was 48.5% in the mBCC group (all partial responses) and 60.3% in the laBCC group (20 patients had complete response and 18 patients had partial response). ORRs were comparable across patient subgroups, including aggressive histologic subtypes (eg, infiltrative BCC). Median DOR was 14.8 months (mBCC) and 26.2 months (laBCC). Median OS was 33.4 months in the mBCC cohort and not estimable in the laBCC cohort. Adverse events remained consistent with clinical experience. Thirty-three deaths (31.7%) were reported; none were related to vismodegib. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term update of the ERIVANCE BCC trial demonstrated durability of response, efficacy across patient subgroups, and manageable long-term safety of vismodegib in patients with advanced BCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered prospectively with Clinicaltrials.gov , number NCT00833417 on January 30, 2009.

The incidence of metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) in Denmark, 1997-2010.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist on the occurrence of metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC). OBJECTIVE: To identify all cases of mBCC in Denmark over a 14-year period. METHODS: We searched the Danish National Patient Registry covering all Danish hospitals, the Danish Cancer Registry, the National Pathology Registry and the Causes of Death Registry during the period 1997 to 2010 for potential cases of mBCC registered according to the International classification of diseases ICD-10 and the International Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED). RESULTS: We identified 126,627 patients with a history of primary basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the registries during the 14-year study period. Using case identifications from the four registries, a total of 170 potential mBCC cases were identified. However, after a pathology review, only five cases could be confirmed, of which three were basosquamous carcinomas. The 14-year cumulative incidence proportion of mBCC was 0.0039% (95% CI 0.0016-0.0083) among individuals with a history of previous BCC (n = 126,627) and 0.0001% (95% CI 0.0000-0.0002) in the general population. CONCLUSION: MBCC is a rare disease and only a small proportion of potential cases identified in automated clinical databases or registries can be confirmed by pathology and medical record review.

Pivotal ERIVANCE basal cell carcinoma (BCC) study: 12-month update of efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced BCC.

BACKGROUND: Primary analysis from the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study resulted in approval of vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor indicated for treatment of adults with metastatic or locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) that has recurred after surgery or for patients who are not candidates for surgery or radiation. OBJECTIVE: An efficacy and safety analysis was conducted 12 months after primary analysis. METHODS: This was a multinational, multicenter, nonrandomized, 2-cohort study in patients with measurable and histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic BCC taking oral vismodegib (150 mg/d). Primary outcome measure was objective response rate (complete and partial responses) assessed by independent review facility. RESULTS: After 12 months of additional follow-up, median duration of exposure to vismodegib was 12.9 months. Objective response rate increased from 30.3% to 33.3% in patients with metastatic disease, and from 42.9% to 47.6% in patients with the locally advanced form. Median duration of response in patients with locally advanced BCC increased from 7.6 to 9.5 months. No new safety signals emerged with extended treatment duration. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include low prevalence of advanced BCC and challenges of designing a study with heterogenous manifestations. CONCLUSION: The 12-month update of the study confirms the efficacy and safety of vismodegib in management of advanced BCC.

A phase II, multicenter, open-label, 3-cohort trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of vismodegib in operable basal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Vismodegib is approved for treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize vismodegib efficacy and safety in operable basal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with new, operable, nodular basal cell carcinoma received vismodegib (150 mg/d) followed by excision and Mohs micrographic surgery to ensure clear margins. Cohort 1 received vismodegib for 12 weeks; cohort 2 received vismodegib for 12 weeks, then 24 weeks of observation before excision; and cohort 3 received vismodegib for 8 weeks on/4 weeks off/8 weeks on. RESULTS: In all, 24 patients enrolled in cohort 1, and 25 in cohorts 2 and 3. Complete histologic clearance was achieved by 42%, 16%, and 44% of patients in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Muscle spasms (76%), alopecia (58%), and dysgeusia (50%) were the most frequent adverse events (AEs). Five (7%) patients discontinued treatment because of an AE. AE reversibility was evaluated in cohort 2 with 24 weeks of observation after treatment discontinuation. LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized, small cohort sizes, and short observation durations for some patients are limitations. CONCLUSION: Primary efficacy end points were not met (predefined complete histologic clearance rate: >50% in cohorts 1 and 3; >30% in cohort 2). Safety was comparable when dosed continuously versus intermittently. Posttreatment reversibility of vismodegib-related AEs was demonstrated.

Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: prognosis dependent on anatomic site and spread of disease.

PURPOSE: This review provides a description of the epidemiology and survival outcomes for cases with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) based on published reports (1981-2011). METHODS: A literature search (MEDLINE via PubMed) was conducted for mBCC case reports published in English: 1981-2011. There were 172 cases that met the following criteria: primary BCC located on skin, metastasis confirmed by pathology and metastasis not resulting from direct tumour spread. From these, 100 mBCC cases with explicit information on follow-up time were selected for analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Among 100 mBCC cases selected for analysis, including one case with Gorlin syndrome, 50% had regional metastases (RM) and 50% had distant metastases (DM). Cases with DM were younger at mBCC diagnosis (mean age, 58.0 versus 66.3 years for RM; P=0.0013). Among 93 (of 100) cases with treatment information for metastatic disease, more DM cases received chemotherapy (36.2% versus 6.5% for RM), but more RM cases underwent surgery (87.0% versus 40.4% for DM). Among all 100 cases, median survival after mBCC diagnosis was 54 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 24-72), with shorter survival in DM (24 months; 95% CI, 12-35) versus RM cases (87 months; 95% CI, 63-not evaluable). CONCLUSION: Cases with RM and DM mBCC may have different clinical courses and outcomes. Based on published reports, DM cases were younger at mBCC diagnosis, with shorter median survival than RM cases. This study provides a historical context for emerging mBCC treatments.

Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.

BACKGROUND: Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of the BRAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032) have shown response rates of more than 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing vemurafenib with dacarbazine in 675 patients with previously untreated, metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary end points were rates of overall and progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the response rate, response duration, and safety. A final analysis was planned after 196 deaths and an interim analysis after 98 deaths. RESULTS: At 6 months, overall survival was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 89) in the vemurafenib group and 64% (95% CI, 56 to 73) in the dacarbazine group. In the interim analysis for overall survival and final analysis for progression-free survival, vemurafenib was associated with a relative reduction of 63% in the risk of death and of 74% in the risk of either death or disease progression, as compared with dacarbazine (P<0.001 for both comparisons). After review of the interim analysis by an independent data and safety monitoring board, crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib was recommended. Response rates were 48% for vemurafenib and 5% for dacarbazine. Common adverse events associated with vemurafenib were arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea; 38% of patients required dose modification because of toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Vemurafenib produced improved rates of overall and progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; BRIM-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01006980.).

Randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study of vandetanib plus docetaxel in previously treated non small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor kinase activity. The activity of vandetanib plus docetaxel was assessed in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This two-part study comprised an open-label run-in phase and a double-blind randomized phase. Eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary objective of the randomized phase was to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving vandetanib (100 or 300 mg/d) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 21 days) versus placebo plus docetaxel. The study was designed to have more than 75% power to detect 50% prolongation at a one-sided significance level of P < .20. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, overall survival, safety and tolerability. RESULTS: In the randomized phase (n = 127), median PFS was 18.7 weeks for vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel (n = 42; hazard ratio v docetaxel = 0.64; one-sided P = .037); 17.0 weeks for vandetanib 300 mg plus docetaxel (n = 44; hazard ratio v docetaxel = 0.83; one-sided P = .231); and 12 weeks for docetaxel (n = 41). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival among the three treatment arms. Common adverse events included diarrhea, rash, and asymptomatic prolongation of corrected QT (QTC) interval. CONCLUSION: The primary objective was achieved, with vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel demonstrating a significant prolongation of PFS compared with docetaxel in relation to the prespecified significance level. On the basis of these encouraging data, phase III evaluation of vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel in second-line NSCLC has been initiated.

Direct inhibition of CD40L expression can contribute to the clinical efficacy of daclizumab independently of its effects on cell division and Th1/Th2 cytokine production.

Humanized anti-CD25 antibodies (eg, daclizumab) have been successfully used to treat several autoimmune diseases. Paradoxically, IL-2 blockade in mice can induce autoimmunity. An interspecies difference in the relative contribution of IL-2 to CD25(+) T regulatory cell (CD25(+)Treg) versus CD25(+) effector cell function might explain this conundrum. Consistent with this are reports that daclizumab inhibits human CD25(+) effector cell cytokine production by blocking the expression of CD40L. However, in mice, IL-4 and IL-12 regulate CD40L expression. As human Th1/Th2 cytokine production is also dependent on IL-2, daclizumab's inhibition of CD40L expression could be due to an indirect, rather than a direct, effect of IL-2. Here, we clarify the mechanisms underlying CD40L expression. In contrast to the mouse, human CD40L is regulated by CD28 signaling and IL-2, not the principal Th1/Th2-polarizing cytokines. We find that CD40L is expressed on naive and memory cells and inhibited by daclizumab independently of cell division. Collectively, our results indicate that daclizumab could inhibit CD25(+) effector T-cell function in vivo by directly blocking CD40L expression. This difference between mice and human may help explain the paradoxical effects of IL-2R blockade in the 2 species.

Phase I clinical trial of costimulated, IL-4 polarized donor CD4+ T cells as augmentation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

The primary objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and biologic effects of administering costimulated, interleukin (IL)-4 polarized donor CD4(+) T cells in the setting of HLA-matched sibling, T cell-replete allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Forty-seven subjects with hematologic malignancy received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants and cyclosporine graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after reduced intensity conditioning. Initial subjects received no additional cells (n = 19); subsequent subjects received additional donor CD4(+) T cells generated ex vivo by CD3/CD28 costimulation in medium containing IL-4 and IL-2 (administered day 1 after HCT at 5, 25, or 125 x 10(6) cells/kg). Studies after HCT included measurement of monocyte IL-1alpha and tumor necrosis factor alpha, detection of T cells with antitumor specificity, and characterization of T cell cytokine phenotype. The culture method generated donor CD4(+) T cells that secreted increased T helper 2 (Th2) cytokines and decreased T helper 1 (Th1) cytokines. Such Th2-like cells were administered without infusional or dose-limiting toxicity. The Th2 cohort had accelerated lymphocyte reconstitution; both cohorts had rapid hematopoietic recovery and alloengraftment. Acute GVHD and overall survival were similar in the Th2 and non-Th2 cohorts. Th2 cell recipients tended to have increased monocyte IL-1alpha and had increased tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion. CD8(+) T cells with antitumor specificity were observed in Th2 and non-Th2 cohorts. Post-transplantation T cells from Th2 cell recipients secreted IL-4 and IL-10 (Th2 cytokines) and IL-2 and interferon gamma (Th1 cytokines). Allograft augmentation with costimulated, IL-4-polarized donor CD4(+) T cells resulted in activated Th1, Th2, and inflammatory cytokine pathways without an apparent increase in GVHD.

Efficient transfer of PSA and PSMA cDNAs into DCs generates antibody and T cell antitumor responses in vivo.

Gene therapy for prostate cancer may be realized through transduction of whole genes, such as PSA or PSMA, into immunotherapeutic dendritic cells (DCs). An oncoretroviral vector encoding human PSMA and a bicistronic oncoretroviral vector encoding human PSA and cell surface CD25 cDNAs were constructed. Remarkably, transfer of PSA/CD25 or PSMA cDNA during murine hematopoietic cell differentiation into DCs occurred with approximately 80% efficiency. In vitro, transduced DCs retained allostimulatory function and primed syngeneic T cells for tumor antigen-specific IFN-gamma secretion. In test experiments designed to elucidate mechanisms in vivo, syngeneic recipients of transduced DCs had increased anti-human PSA antibody titers and tumor-specific CD8(+) T cell IFN-gamma secretion with no detectable immune response to CD25. Gene-modified DC recipients had increased protection from specific tumor challenge for at least 18 weeks post-vaccination. DC vaccination also protected both male and female recipients. Gene-modified DC vaccination mediated regression of established, specific gene-expressing, TRAMP-C1 prostate cancer cell tumors. These findings indicate that antibody and cellular responses generated through PSA and PSMA gene transfer into DC yielded protective immunity, thereby providing further preclinical support for the implementation of immuno-gene therapy approaches for prostate cancer.

Clinical "cytokine storm" as revealed by monocyte intracellular flow cytometry: correlation of tumor necrosis factor alpha with severe gut graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) contributes significantly to lethality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In murine models, macrophage secretion of interleukin 1alpha (IL-1alpha) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) contributes to gut GVHD pathogenesis. To help characterize whether human gut GVHD has similar biological characteristics, monocyte IL-1alpha and TNF-alpha production were evaluated after HSCT. METHODS: Patients with refractory hematologic malignancy (n = 17) underwent reduced-intensity conditioning, HLA-matched sibling HSCT, and cyclosporine A GVHD prophylaxis. After HSCT, monocyte IL-1alpha and TNF-alpha levels were measured using intracellular flow cytometry (IC-FCM), and results were correlated with clinical GVHD. RESULTS: Incidences of acute GVHD were none (n = 3), grades I-II (n = 9), or grades III-IV (n = 5; each case with stage 2-3 gut GVHD). Posttransplantation monocyte IL-1alpha production (percentage of CD14(+)IL-1(+) cells) increased significantly from 8.7% +/- 3.7% (week 2) to 40.3% +/- 7.3% (week 4; P = 0.0065) and was not associated with GVHD severity (P = 1.00). Conversely, increases in monocyte TNF-alpha were quantitatively reduced and temporally delayed, from 0.6% +/- 0.2% (week 2) to 3.6% +/- 1.4% (week 6; P = 0.076). Most importantly, elevation of monocyte TNF-alpha level correlated with increased gut GVHD severity (P = 0.0041); increases in monocyte TNF-alpha levels typically preceded the onset of gut GVHD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Human gut GVHD after reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT is associated with monocyte cytokine secretion initially involving IL-1alpha, followed by TNF-alpha. Serial measurement of monocyte cytokines, in particular, TNF-alpha, by IC-FCM may represent a noninvasive method for GVHD monitoring, potentially allowing the identification of patients appropriate for early-intervention strategies.

Establishment of early donor engraftment after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to potentiate the graft-versus-lymphoma effect against refractory lymphomas.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), which typically results in mixed chimerism initially after transplantation, has had limited efficacy in chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas. We hypothesized that the rapid establishment of complete donor chimerism would potentiate a graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Fifteen patients with chemotherapy-refractory lymphoma initially received induction with a conventional chemotherapy regimen (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, fludarabine [EPOCH-F]) to deplete host T cells and provide disease control prior to alloHSCT. Patients then received conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by alloHSCT from HLA-matched siblings. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine alone. EPOCH-F resulted in 73% of patients having partial responses or stable disease. EPOCH-F depleted host CD4(+) T cells from a median of 235 cells/microL to 56 cells/microL. Fourteen patients underwent alloHSCT, and all had >95% donor engraftment by day 14 after transplantation. The incidence of Grade II to III acute graft-versus-host disease was 71%. There were two therapy-related deaths. There were 8 partial responses and 3 complete responses (CRs) at day 28. Five additional CRs were observed at day 100 without withdrawal of cyclosporine or donor lymphocyte infusion. The rate of CRs for all 15 patients was 60%. The 1-year progression-free survival rate from time of study entry is 67% with only 1 relapse among 9 CRs. At a median potential follow-up of 28 months, the overall survival rate is 53%. These data demonstrate that a potent and durable graft-versus-lymphoma effect can occur against chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas and suggest that this effect may be associated with rapid, complete donor chimerism after reduced-intensity alloHSCT.