Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative ultrasonography for anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.

Background: Ultrasonography has been applied as an alternative method in the assessment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology including anterior disc displacement (ADD). However, a concrete screening or diagnostic method which is feasible in clinical practice has not yet been established. The study aimed to establish a quantitative ultrasonographic method and determine its diagnostic efficacy for ADD of the TMJ. Methods: A total of 75 joints were allocated to either the normal disc position (NDP) group or the ADD group using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard. Longitudinal scans of the lateral articular compartment were obtained by a 14-MHz L-shaped linear array transducer. The width of the lateral joint space (LJS), the upper lateral joint space (ULJS), and the lower lateral joint space (LLJS), as well as the position of the lateral articular disc edge (ADE), were investigated by stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant indicators of ADD and to build a diagnostic model. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were computed at the optimal cut-off value. Results: MRI detected 25 joints in the NDP group and 50 joints in the ADD group. Correlation analysis indicated that all 4 variables were associated with ADD. With the best performance of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.939, LJS and ULJS were identified as predictors of ADD and subsequently adopted to build a diagnostic model by stepwise logistic regression. The optimal cut-off value of the 2-variable regression model for diagnosing ADD was 0.800, with a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 97.6%, NPV of 72.7%, and an accuracy of 86.7%. Conclusions: The quantitative ultrasonographic diagnostic method showed promising diagnostic efficacy. It has the potential to be used for ADD screening in future clinical practice.

Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters in left ventricular noncompaction with left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been used to diagnose and risk-stratify patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). The prognostic value of CMR parameters for LVNC, especially feature tracking (CMR-FT), is not well known in LVNC patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The present study aimed to investigate whether the combination of CMR-FT with traditional CMR parameters can increase the prognostic value of CMR for LVNC patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: A total of 123 candidates were retrospectively included in this multicenter study and 55 LVNC patients (mean age, 45.7 ± 16.2 years; 61.8% men) remained after applying the exclusion criteria. Clinical features, left ventricular (LV) function parameters, global and segment myocardial strain, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were evaluated. The outcomes include the composite events of cardiovascular death, heart transplantation, hospitalization for heart failure, thromboembolic events, and ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.17 years (interquartile range: 0.17 to 10.58 years), 24 (36.8%) patients experienced at least one major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). The myocardial strain parameters of patients with events were lower than those of patients without events. In the univariable Cox analysis, LVEF, the presence of LGE, global longitudinal strain (GLS) and segmental strains, including longitudinal strain at the apical level and radial and circumferential strain at the basal level, were significantly associated with MACEs. In the multivariate analysis, LGE (hazard ratio (HR) 3.452, 95% CI 1.133 to 10.518, p = 0.029) was a strong predictor of MACEs and significantly improved the predictive value (chi-square of the model after adding LGE: 7.51 vs. 13.47, p = 0.009). However, myocardial strain parameters were not statistically significant for the prediction of MACEs after adjusting for age, body mass index, LVEF and the presence of LGE and did not increase the prognostic value (chi-square of the model after adding GLS: 13.47 vs. 14.14, p = 0.411) in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CMR-FT with traditional CMR parameters may not increase the prognostic value of CMR in LVNC patients with reduced LVEF, while the presence of LGE was a strong independent predictor of MACEs and significantly improved the predictive value.

Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Left Ventricular Noncompaction: A Multicenter Study.

Current diagnostic criteria for left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) may be poorly related to adverse prognosis. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but risk stratification of LGE in patients with LVNC remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data of 75 patients from three institutes and examined the correlation between different LGE types and MACE based on the extent, pattern (including a specific ring-like pattern), and locations of LGE in LVNC. A total of 51 patients (68%) presented LGE. A specific ring-like pattern was observed in 9 (12%). MACE occurred in 29 (38.7%) at 4.3 years of follow-up (interquartile range: 2.1−5.7 years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for patients with ring-like LGE were 6.10 (95% CI, 1.39−26.75, p < 0.05). Free-wall or mid-wall LGE was associated with an increased risk of MACE after adjustment (HR 2.85, 95% CI, 1.31−6.21; HR 4.35, 95% CI, 1.23−15.37, respectively, p < 0.05). The risk of MACE in LVNC significantly increased when the LGE extent was greater than 7.5% and ring-like, multiple segments, and free-wall LGE were associated with MACE. These results suggest the value of LGE risk stratification in patients with LVNC.

Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance features and clinical consequences in patients with left ventricular non-compaction with and without mitral regurgitation-a multi-institutional study of the retrospective cohort study.

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with ischemic or idiopathic cardiomyopathies and may be associated with a poor prognosis; however, the impact of different degrees of MR on cardiovascular magnetic resonance images, left ventricular features, and clinical outcomes of left ventricular noncompaction are unknown. We aimed to investigate and compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and clinical consequences in patients with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) with and without MR. Methods: A cohort of 75 patients with left ventricular noncompaction were retrospectively studied from three institutions; all had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination with subsequent clinical follow-up. MR was evaluated by echocardiography. Left ventricular myocardial strains including global radial, circumferential, and longitudinal peak strains and left ventricular geometric and functional parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, left ventricular mass, left ventricular sphericity index, longitudinal shorten, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were measured and compared among groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of heart transplantation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion, and cardiac death. Results: Compared with the no MR group, the MR groups showed significant deterioration in left ventricular myocardial strains (all P<0.05), and impaired left ventricular geometry and function, including lower left ventricular ejection fraction and greater left ventricular end-systolic volume and left ventricular mass (P<0.05). In the subgroup of moderate-severe MR, patients showed more impaired cardiovascular magnetic resonance features, including left ventricular sphericity index, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and longitudinal shorten (P<0.05). In this subgroup, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in clinical outcomes (log-rank χ2=4.516, P=0.034; log-rank χ2=4.419, P=0.036, respectively). Additionally, multivariate analyses showed a 6.5-fold higher [hazard ratio, 6.5 (95% CI, 1.015-41.881)] risk of cardiac death with LGE in the moderate-severe MR cohort. Conclusions: In patients with left ventricular noncompaction, MR induced more maladaptive left ventricular remodeling. The incidence of adverse outcomes may be related to the degree of MR. In moderate-severe MR patients, coexisting of LGE may have an additive deleterious effect on clinical outcomes.

Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and clinical prognosis in left ventricular noncompaction patients with and without arrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare type of cardiomyopathy, and one of its clinical manifestations is arrhythmia. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of LVNC. However, studies are lacking on the use of CMR for LVNC patients with arrhythmia. This study aimed to characterize and compare CMR features and prognosis in LVNC patients with and without arrhythmia. METHODS: Eighty-four LVNC patients diagnosed by CMR were enrolled retrospectively in this study. Clinical data, arrhythmia characteristics, and CMR parameters were collected. Patients were divided into different groups according to the arrhythmia characteristics and CMR manifestations for statistical analysis and comparison. Ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (Vf), ventricular flutter (VFL), III° atrioventricular block (III° AVB), Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) and ventricular escape (VE) were defined as malignant arrhythmias and benign arrhythmias included premature ventricular contraction, atrial premature beats, atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, supraventricular premature beat, bundle branch block, atrial flutter and sinus tachycardia. The outcome events were defined as a composition event of cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, heart transplantation, and implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). RESULTS: Sixty-seven LVNC patients (79.76%) mainly presented with arrhythmia, including premature ventricular beat (33 patients [27.73%]), bundle branch block (14 patients [11.77%]), electrocardiogram waveform changes (18 patients [15.13%]), and ventricular tachycardia (11 patients [9.24%]). The cardiac function and structure parameters had no significant difference among the nonarrhythmia group, benign arrhythmia group, and malignant arrhythmia group. However, the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was higher in the malignant arrhythmia group than in the other two groups (p = 0.023). At a mean follow-up of 46 months, cardiac events occurred in twenty-three patients (46.94%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in prognosis among the nonarrhythmia, benign, and malignant arrhythmia groups, but the patients with arrhythmia and association with LGE + or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% had a higher risk than patients with LGE- or LVEF > 30% (LGE +, HR = 4.035, 95% CI 1.475-11.035; LVEF < 30%, HR = 8.131, 95% CI 1.805-36.636; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In LVNC patients, the types of arrhythmias are numerous and unrepresentative, and arrhythmia is not the prognostic factor. Arrhythmia combined with presence of LGE or LVEF < 30% is associated with poor prognosis in LVNC patients.