Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ ; 385: e077890, 2024 06 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897625

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial. SETTING: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up. CONCLUSION: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.


Assuntos
Albuminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Capecitabina , Cisplatino , Desoxicitidina , Gencitabina , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidade , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Albuminas/administração & dosagem , Albuminas/efeitos adversos , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , China , Metástase Neoplásica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...