Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 8(2): e56692, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23437213

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The androgen receptor (AR) plays a critical role in the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. However, its mechanism of action in proliferation remains unknown. An understanding of the mechanism of AR action in proliferation may lead to the development of effective strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study we report that pulse treatment of synchronized LNCaP cells with Casodex, an AR-antagonist, for 4 hours in mid-G(1) phase was sufficient to prevent cells from entering S phase. Since the assembly of pre-replication complex (pre-RC) in G(1) is required for the progression of cells from G(1) to S phase, the effect of Casodex during mid-G(1) suggested that the role of AR in proliferation might be to regulate the assembly of pre-RC. To test this possibility, we investigated the interaction between AR and Cdc6, an essential component of pre-RC in LNCaP cells. AR co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated with Cdc6, and Casodex treatment disrupted this interaction. AR-immunoprecipitate (AR-IP) also contained cyclin E and cyclin A, which play a critical role in pre-RC assembly and cell cycle entry into S phase, and DNA polymerase-α, PCNA, and ribonucleotide reductase, which are essential for the initiation of DNA synthesis. In addition, in cells in S phase, AR co-sedimented with components of the DNA replication machinery of cells that entered S phase. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Together, these observations suggest a novel role of AR as a component of the pre-RC to exert control over progression of LNCaP cells from G(1) to S phase through a mechanism that is independent of its role as a transcription factor.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos/administração & dosagem , Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/efeitos dos fármacos , Nitrilas/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores Androgênicos/genética , Compostos de Tosil/administração & dosagem , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Ciclina A/metabolismo , Ciclina E/metabolismo , Replicação do DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Pontos de Checagem da Fase G1 do Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Receptores Androgênicos/metabolismo
2.
Prostate ; 71(8): 857-71, 2011 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21456068

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is not curative if patients have undetected metastatic prostate cancer. Markers that indicate the presence of metastatic disease would identify men who may benefit from systemic adjuvant therapy. Our approach was to analyze the primary tumors of men with metastatic disease versus organ-confined disease to identify molecular changes that distinguish between these groups. METHODS: Patients were identified based on long-term follow-up of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels following RP. We compared the tumors of African American (AA) men with undetectable serum PSA for >9 year after RP (good outcome) versus those of AA men with a rising PSA and recurrence after radiation or androgen ablation or both (poor outcome). We used real-time quantitative PCR to assay gene copy number alterations in tumor DNA relative to patient-matched non-tumor DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. We assayed several genes located in the specific regions of chromosome 8p and 8q that frequently undergo loss and/or gain, respectively, in prostate cancer, and the androgen receptor gene at Xq12. RESULTS: Gain of the MIR151 gene at 8q24.3 (in 33% of poor outcome vs. 6% of good outcome tumors) and/or loss of the NKX3-1 gene at 8p21.2 (in 39% of poor outcome vs. 11% of good outcome tumors) affected 67% of poor outcome tumors, compared to only 17% of good outcome tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Copy number gain of the MIR151 gene and/or loss of the NKX3-1 gene in the primary tumor may indicate the presence of metastatic disease.


Assuntos
Cromossomos Humanos Par 8/genética , Deleção de Genes , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/genética , MicroRNAs/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Negro ou Afro-Americano/genética , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Seguimentos , Dosagem de Genes , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Prognóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 133(11): 1131-8, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18025318

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine epigenetic events of aberrant promoter methylation as diagnostic markers in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using a novel multigene approach. Promoter methylation-mediated silencing is a hallmark of several established tumor suppressor genes. Changes in DNA methylation have been reported to occur early in carcinogenesis and therefore are potentially important early indicators of existing disease. DESIGN: A multicandidate gene probe panel interrogated DNA for aberrant methylation status in 22 cancer genes using the methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) assay. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation was confirmed using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction after bisulfite treatment. SETTING: Primary care medical center. SUBJECTS: We examined fresh-frozen primary head and neck tumor specimens from 28 patients, including 21 late-stage (19 stage IV and 2 stage III) and 7 early-stage (6 stage II and 1 stage I) tumors. RESULTS: Promoter hypermethylation was observed in 14 of the 28 patients (50%). Genes for RARB, APC, and CHFR were most frequently hypermethylated, occurring in 11 (39%) for RARB, 7 (25%) for CHFR, and 6 (21%) for APC. Aberrant methylation of CHFR was solely a stage IV event. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction after bisulfite treatment with conventional and real-time polymerase chain reaction confirmed aberrant methylation for RARB and CHFR. CONCLUSIONS: Promoter methylation profiling of primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using multiple target genes identified RARB, APC, and CHFR as frequent epigenetic events. The clinical implications of these genes as diagnostic and treatment biomarkers are highly relevant as attractive targets for cancer therapy, given the reversible nature of epigenetic gene silencing.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/fisiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Metilação de DNA , Genes Neoplásicos/fisiologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/genética , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Epigênese Genética/fisiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...