Coverage, Usage, Physical Integrity, and Bio-efficacy of Olyset Nets in the Plateau Region, South Benin Following the 2011 Nationwide Distribution.

The present study investigated in 8 villages of the Plateau region the coverage, usage, physical integrity, and bio-efficacy of the Olyset nets distributed nationwide by the Benin's National Malaria Control Programme in July 2011. The questionnaire administered as well as the observations made in the households allowed estimating the coverage and usage rates of the 2011 Olyset nets. While their physical integrity was assessed through standard WHO methodology, their bio-efficacy was evaluated through gas chromatography, and WHO cone testing performed with the Kisumu susceptible strain. Mosquito collections through human landing catches (HLCs) were also performed in torn nets to assess if a loss of protection of sleepers occurred as the nets fabric integrity got more damaged. Nine months postdistribution, the coverage and usage rates of the 2011 Olyset nets were 67.4% (95% CI: 65.8-68.9) and 73.3% (95% CI: 70.7-75.8) respectively. About 28% of the 2011 Olyset nets were torn. A drastic drop of the insecticide quantity on the fibers of the nets [from 7.08 µg (95% CI: 5.74-8.42) to 0.2 µg (95% CI: 0.01-0.38)] as well as mortality rates <80% were observed with most nets evaluated. Moreover, the biting rates of An. gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) inside torn nets increased in line with their fabric integrity loss. These data support the conclusion that future deployment of nets in the field must be strengthened by community sensitization on their correct use in order to postpone as much as possible appearance of holes and loss of insecticidal activity and encourage repairing of torn nets.

A tracking tool for long-lasting insecticidal (mosquito) net intervention following a 2011 national distribution in Benin.

BACKGROUND: Following a mass distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in Benin, we used WHO guidelines to develop an assessment tool which is described in this report. It involved assessment of the three WHO indicators: survivorship, integrity and bio-efficacy. METHODS: To evaluate the assessment tool, we selected four communities, two in the Southern part of the country, and two in the North. One of the two assessment communities in each geographic setting had ready access to water and a higher reported frequency of washing LLINs. It was assumed that nets in communities with greater washing frequencies would show greater loss of durability. If the tool was sensitive enough to detect such differences, the field testing would confirm its suitability for general use in different settings in Benin. While durability indicators of survival and fabric integrity were quantified using standard WHO methodology, bio-efficacy was assessed using a 'new' alternative (to the WHO bioassay test), involving gas chromatography. Additionally, data management used current internet technology for 'real time' analysis at a central monitoring location. RESULTS: While no difference in survivorship was observed between sites with ready access to water for washing, both in the North and the South, there was a significant difference in integrity. In the South and in the North, nets from sites near water (Kessounou and Malanville) showed greater damage to integrity than did the nets from Allada and Kandi (sites far from water). As expected, LLIN integrity was significantly lower when a community was near water (p < 0.01). Bio-efficacy measurements, based on GC, were found to be so variable. CONCLUSION: A rapid decrease of the LLINs fabric integrity was observed in areas near water for washing following the first 6 months post-distribution. Due to the way that the insecticide is incorporated into the LLIN fiber and its migration to the surface, confounding results were observed with the GC analysis suggesting that the WHO bio-efficacy method may also be similarly affected. The report of other assessments could help to better understand the durability of the LLINs.