Calibration of infrared milk analyzers: modified milk versus producer milk.

Mid-infrared (MIR) milk analyzers are traditionally calibrated using sets of preserved raw individual producer milk samples. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of sets of preserved pasteurized modified milks improved calibration performance of MIR milk analyzers compared with calibration sets of producer milks. The preserved pasteurized modified milk sets exhibited more consistent day-to-day and set-to-set calibration slope and intercept values for all components compared with the preserved raw producer milk calibration sets. Pasteurized modified milk calibration samples achieved smaller confidence interval (CI) around the regression line (i.e., calibration uncertainty). Use of modified milk calibration sets with a larger component range, more even distribution of component concentrations within the ranges, and the lower correlation of fat and protein concentrations than producer milk calibration sets produced a smaller 95% CI for the regression line due to the elimination of moderate and high leverage samples. The CI for the producer calibration sets were about 2 to 12 times greater than the CI for the modified milk calibration sets, depending on the component. Modified milk calibration samples have the potential to produce MIR milk analyzer calibrations that will perform better in validation checks than producer milk-based calibrations by reducing the mean difference and standard deviation of the difference between instrument values and reference chemistry.

Modified versus producer milk calibration: mid-infrared analyzer performance validation.

Our objective was to determine the validation performance of mid-infrared (MIR) milk analyzers, using the traditional fixed-filter approach, when the instruments were calibrated with producer milk calibration samples vs. modified milk calibration samples. Ten MIR analyzers were calibrated using producer milk calibration sample sets, and 9 MIR milk analyzers were calibrated using modified milk sample sets. Three sets of 12 validation milk samples with all-laboratory mean chemistry reference values were tested during a 3-mo period. Calibration of MIR milk analyzers using modified milk increased the accuracy (i.e., better agreement with chemistry) and improved agreement between laboratories on validation milk samples compared with MIR analyzers calibrated with producer milk samples. Calibration of MIR analyzers using modified milk samples reduced overall mean Euclidian distance for all components for all 3 validation sets by at least 24% compared with MIR analyzers calibrated with producer milk sets. Calibration with modified milk sets reduced the average Euclidian distance from all-laboratory mean reference chemistry on validation samples by 40, 25, 36, and 27%, respectively for fat, anhydrous lactose, true protein, and total solids. Between-laboratory agreement was evaluated using reproducibility standard deviation (s(R)). The number of single Grubbs statistical outliers in the validation data was much higher (53 vs. 7) for the instruments calibrated with producer milk than for instruments calibrated with modified milk sets. The s(R) for instruments calibrated with producer milks (with statistical outliers removed) was similar to data collected in recent proficiency studies, whereas the s(R) for instruments calibrated with modified milks was lower than those calibrated with producer milks by 46, 52, 61, and 55%, respectively for fat, anhydrous lactose, true protein, and total solids.