RESUMO
Rapidly rising health insurance costs have strained U.S. families and employers in recent years. This issue brief examines data for all states on changes in private employer premiums and deductibles for 2003 and 2009. The analysis finds that premiums for businesses and their employees increased 41 percent across states from 2003 to 2009, while per-person deductibles jumped 77 percent in large as well as small firms. If these trends continue at the rate prior to enactment of the Affordable Care Act, the average premium for family coverage will rise 79 percent by 2020, to more than $23,000. The authors describe how health reform offers the potential to reduce insurance cost growth while improving value and protection. If reforms succeed in slowing premium growth by 1 percentage point annually in all states, by 2020 employers and families together will save $2,323 annually for family coverage, compared with projected trends.
Assuntos
Controle de Custos/tendências , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/tendências , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/tendências , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Benefícios do Seguro/tendências , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Controle de Custos/economia , Controle de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência , Redução de Custos/economia , Redução de Custos/legislação & jurisprudência , Redução de Custos/tendências , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/economia , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/legislação & jurisprudência , Previsões , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/legislação & jurisprudência , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Benefícios do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Estadual , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This 2008 survey of chronically ill adults in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States finds major differences among countries in access, safety, and care efficiency. U.S. patients were at particularly high risk of forgoing care because of costs and of experiencing inefficient, poorly organized care, or errors. The Dutch, who have a strong primary care infrastructure, report notably positive access and coordination experiences. Still, deficits in care management during hospital discharge or when seeing multiple doctors occurred in all countries. Findings highlight the need for system innovations to improve outcomes for patients with complex chronic conditions.
Assuntos
Países Desenvolvidos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Idoso , Doença Crônica/terapia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
This paper presents the findings of a new scorecard designed to assess and monitor multiple domains of U.S. health system performance. The scorecard uses national and international data to identify performance benchmarks and calculates simple ratio scores comparing U.S averages to benchmarks. Average ratio scores range from 51 to 71 across domains of health outcomes, quality, access, equity, and efficiency. The overall picture that emerges from the scorecard is one of missed opportunities and room for improvement. The findings underscore the importance of policies that take a coherent, whole-system approach to change and address the interaction of access, quality, and cost.