Derivation and Validation of ICD-10 Codes for Identifying Incident Stroke.

Importance: Claims data with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes are routinely used in clinical research. However, the use of ICD-10 codes to define incident stroke has not been validated against expert-adjudicated outcomes in the US population. Objective: To develop and validate the accuracy of an ICD-10 code list to detect incident stroke events using Medicare inpatient fee-for-service claims data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from 2 prospective population-based cohort studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, and included participants aged 65 years or older without prior stroke who had linked Medicare claims data. Stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies were identified via active surveillance and adjudicated by expert review. Medicare-linked ARIC data (2016-2018) were used to develop a list of ICD-10 codes for incident stroke detection. The list was validated using Medicare-linked REGARDS data (2016-2019). Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Exposures: Stroke events detected in Medicare claims vs expert-adjudicated stroke events in the ARIC and REGARDS studies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of incident stroke detection using ICD-10 codes. Results: In the ARIC study, there were 110 adjudicated incident stroke events among 5194 participants (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [5.3] years) over a median follow-up of 3.0 (range, 0.003-3.0) years. Most ARIC participants were women (3160 [60.8%]); 993 (19.1%) were Black and 4180 (80.5%) were White. Using the primary diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 81.8% (95% CI, 73.3%-88.5%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.8%-99.3%) to detect incident stroke. Using any diagnosis code on a Medicare billing claim, the sensitivity was 94.5% (95% CI, 88.5%-98.0%) and the specificity was 98.4% (95% CI, 98.0%-98.8%). In the REGARDS study, there were 140 adjudicated incident strokes among 6359 participants (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.0] years) over a median follow-up of 4.0 (range, 0-4.0) years. More than half of the REGARDS participants were women (3351 [52.7%]); 1774 (27.9%) were Black and 4585 (72.1%) were White. For the primary diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 70.7% (95% CI, 63.2%-78.3%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.4%). For any diagnosis code, the ICD-10 code list had a sensitivity of 77.9% (95% CI, 71.0%-84.7%) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that ICD-10 codes could be used to identify incident stroke events in Medicare claims with moderate sensitivity and high specificity.

Associations Between Stroke Type, Ischemic Stroke Subtypes, and Post-Stroke Cognitive Trajectories.

Background: It is unclear how post-stroke cognitive trajectories differ by stroke type and ischemic stroke subtype. We studied associations between stroke types (ischemic, hemorrhagic), ischemic stroke subtypes (cardioembolic, large artery atherosclerotic, lacunar/small vessel, cryptogenic/other determined etiology), and post-stroke cognitive decline. Methods: This pooled cohort analysis from four US cohort studies (1971-2019) identified 1,143 dementia-free individuals with acute stroke during follow-up: 1,061 (92.8%) ischemic, 82 (7.2%) hemorrhagic, 49.9% female, 30.8% Black. Median age at stroke was 74.1 (IQR, 68.6, 79.3) years. Outcomes were change in global cognition (primary) and changes in executive function and memory (secondary). Outcomes were standardized as T-scores (mean [SD], 50 [10]); a 1-point difference represents a 0.1-SD difference in cognition. Median follow-up for the primary outcome was 6.0 (IQR, 3.2, 9.2) years. Linear mixed-effects models estimated changes in cognition after stroke. Results: On average, the initial post-stroke global cognition score was 50.78 points (95% CI, 49.52, 52.03) in ischemic stroke survivors and did not differ in hemorrhagic stroke survivors (difference, -0.17 points [95% CI, -1.64, 1.30]; P=0.82) after adjusting for demographics and pre-stroke cognition. On average, ischemic stroke survivors showed declines in global cognition, executive function, and memory. Post-stroke declines in global cognition, executive function, and memory did not differ between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke survivors. 955 ischemic strokes had subtypes: 200 (20.9%) cardioembolic, 77 (8.1%) large artery atherosclerotic, 207 (21.7%) lacunar/small vessel, 471 (49.3%) cryptogenic/other determined etiology. On average, small vessel stroke survivors showed declines in global cognition and memory, but not executive function. Initial post-stroke cognitive scores and cognitive declines did not differ between small vessel survivors and survivors of other ischemic stroke subtypes. Post-stroke vascular risk factor levels did not attenuate associations. Conclusion: Stroke survivors had cognitive decline in multiple domains. Declines did not differ by stroke type or ischemic stroke subtype.

Epidemiologic Features of Recovery From SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Importance: Persistent symptoms and disability following SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as post-COVID-19 condition or "long COVID," are frequently reported and pose a substantial personal and societal burden. Objective: To determine time to recovery following SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify factors associated with recovery by 90 days. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this prospective cohort study, standardized ascertainment of SARS-CoV-2 infection was conducted starting in April 1, 2020, across 14 ongoing National Institutes of Health-funded cohorts that have enrolled and followed participants since 1971. This report includes data collected through February 28, 2023, on adults aged 18 years or older with self-reported SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exposure: Preinfection health conditions and lifestyle factors assessed before and during the pandemic via prepandemic examinations and pandemic-era questionnaires. Main Outcomes and Measures: Probability of nonrecovery by 90 days and restricted mean recovery times were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to assess multivariable-adjusted associations with recovery by 90 days. Results: Of 4708 participants with self-reported SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [13.8] years; 2952 women [62.7%]), an estimated 22.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-23.7%) did not recover by 90 days post infection. Median (IQR) time to recovery was 20 (8-75) days. By 90 days post infection, there were significant differences in restricted mean recovery time according to sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics, particularly by acute infection severity (outpatient vs critical hospitalization, 32.9 days [95% CI, 31.9-33.9 days] vs 57.6 days [95% CI, 51.9-63.3 days]; log-rank P < .001). Recovery by 90 days post infection was associated with vaccination prior to infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.51) and infection during the sixth (Omicron variant) vs first wave (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49). These associations were mediated by reduced severity of acute infection (33.4% and 17.6%, respectively). Recovery was unfavorably associated with female sex (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92) and prepandemic clinical cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99). No significant multivariable-adjusted associations were observed for age, educational attainment, smoking history, obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or elevated depressive symptoms. Results were similar for reinfections. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, more than 1 in 5 adults did not recover within 3 months of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recovery within 3 months was less likely in women and those with preexisting cardiovascular disease and more likely in those with COVID-19 vaccination or infection during the Omicron variant wave.

Cytokines, C-Reactive Protein, and Risk of Incident Hypertension in the REGARDS Study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a highly prevalent cardiovascular disease risk factor that may be related to inflammation. Whether adverse levels of specific inflammatory cytokines relate to hypertension is unknown. The present study sought to determine whether higher levels of IL (interleukin)-1ß, IL-6, TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-α, IFN (interferon)-γ, IL-17A, and CRP (C-reactive protein) are associated with a greater risk of incident hypertension. METHODS: The REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Difference in Stroke) is a prospective cohort study that recruited 30 239 community-dwelling Black and White adults from the contiguous United States in 2003 to 2007 (visit 1), with follow-up 9 years later in 2013 to 2016 (visit 2). We included participants without prevalent hypertension who attended follow-up 9 years later and had available laboratory measures and covariates of interest. Poisson regression estimated the risk ratio of incident hypertension by level of inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: Among 1866 included participants (mean [SD] aged of 62 [8] years, 25% Black participants, 55% women), 36% developed hypertension. In fully adjusted models comparing the third to first tertile of each biomarker, there was a greater risk of incident hypertension for higher IL-1ß among White (1.24 [95% CI, 1.01-1.53]) but not Black participants (1.01 [95% CI, 0.83-1.23]) and higher TNF-α (1.20 [95% CI, 1.02-1.41]) and IFN-γ (1.22 [95% CI, 1.04-1.42]) among all participants. There was no increased risk with IL-6, IL-17A, or CRP. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of IL-1ß, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, representing distinct inflammatory pathways, are elevated in advance of hypertension development. Whether modifying these cytokines will reduce incident hypertension is unknown.

Differences in Receipt of Neurologist Evaluation During Hospitalization for Ischemic Stroke by Race, Sex, Age, and Region: The REGARDS Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Improving access to health care providers with clinical expertise in stroke care may influence the use of recommended strategies for reducing disparities in quality of care. Few studies have examined differences in the receipt of evaluation by neurologists during the hospital stay. We examined the proportion of individuals hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke who received evaluation by a neurologist during the hospital stay and characterized differences in receipt of neurologist evaluation by race (Black vs White), sex, age, and study region (Stroke Belt residence vs other) among those experiencing a stroke who were participating in a national cohort study. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using medical record data abstracted from 1,042 participants enrolled in the national Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke cohort study (2003-2007) who experienced an adjudicated ischemic stroke between 2003 and 2016. Participants with a history of stroke before baseline, in-hospital death, hospice discharge following their stroke, or incomplete records were excluded resulting in 839 cases. Differences were assessed using modified Poisson regression adjusting for participant-level and hospital-level factors. RESULTS: Of the 839 incident strokes, 722 (86%) received evaluation by a neurologist during the hospital stay. There were no significant differences by age, race, or sex, yet Stroke Belt residents and those receiving care in rural hospitals were significantly less likely to receive neurologist evaluation compared with non-Stroke Belt residents (relative risk [RR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.90-1.01) and participants receiving care in urban hospitals (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86). Participants with a greater level of poststroke functional impairment (modified Rankin scale) and those with a greater number of risk factors were more likely to receive neurologist evaluation compared with those with lower levels of poststroke functional impairment (RR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) and fewer risk factors (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04). DISCUSSION: While differences in access to neurologists during the hospital stay were partially explained by patient need in our study, there were also significant differences in access by region and urban-rural hospital status. Ensuring access to neurologists during the hospital stay in such settings may require policy-level and/or system-level changes.

Sleep Apnea and Incident Stroke in a National Cohort of Black and White Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial/ethnic differences have been documented in the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and stroke incidence, yet racial differences in OSA symptoms or treatment and their relationship with stroke incidence are underexplored and may contribute to stroke disparities. We comprehensively examined OSA symptoms and their relationships to stroke incidence by race/ethnicity. METHODS: Data were collected from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a population-based cohort of Black and White individuals in the United States. Participants free from a stroke diagnosis at baseline were included. Participants self-reported the following: (1) snoring; (2) daytime sleepiness; (3) provider-diagnosed sleep apnea (PDSA); and (4) treatment for PDSA using positive airway pressure (PAP). OSA risk was categorized as high or low based on the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire. Incident stroke was defined as first occurrence of stroke over an average of 12 (SD 3.9) years of follow-up. We report the relationships between snoring, OSA risk, PDSA, PAP therapy use, and incident stroke by race/ethnicity using Cox proportional hazards models after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors and stroke risk factors. RESULTS: Among the 22,192 participants (mean age [SD] 64.2[9.1] years), 38.1% identified as Black. Overall, snoring was not associated with incident stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.13). However, among White individuals but not Black individuals, high OSA risk and PDSA were associated with incident stroke (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.47; HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.70, respectively). PAP therapy use among those with PDSA (compared with non-PDSA) was associated with incident stroke in White individuals (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05-1.80). PAP therapy use among those with PDSA (compared with those with PDSA without PAP therapy use) was associated with reduced risk of incident stroke in Black (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.91) but not White (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37-1.10) individuals. DISCUSSION: White individuals with high OSA risk and those with PDSA with or without PAP therapy use were at increased incident stroke risk, whereas Black individuals reporting PDSA and PAP had reduced incident stroke risk relative to those not using PAP. Future research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying racial differences in OSA and stroke such as differences in assessment modes and treatment.

Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Spike 1 Antibody Response Among Vaccinated US Adults: the C4R Study.

This study investigates correlates of anti-S1 antibody response following COVID-19 vaccination in a U.S. population-based meta-cohort of adults participating in longstanding NIH-funded cohort studies. Anti-S1 antibodies were measured from dried blood spots collected between February 2021-August 2022 using Luminex-based microsphere immunoassays. Of 6245 participants, mean age was 73 years (range, 21-100), 58% were female, and 76% were non-Hispanic White. Nearly 52% of participants received the BNT162b2 vaccine and 48% received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Lower anti-S1 antibody levels are associated with age of 65 years or older, male sex, higher body mass index, smoking, diabetes, COPD and receipt of BNT16b2 vaccine (vs mRNA-1273). Participants with a prior infection, particularly those with a history of hospitalized illness, have higher anti-S1 antibody levels. These results suggest that adults with certain socio-demographic and clinical characteristics may have less robust antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccination and could be prioritized for more frequent re-vaccination.

Sleep duration and all-cause mortality among stroke survivors.

BACKGROUND: Post stroke sleep duration could increase the risk of death. This study tested the hypothesis that inadequate sleep duration is associated with increased mortality among stroke survivors. METHODS: The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS), a national population-based longitudinal study, was the data source. Sleep duration was ascertained between 2013 and 2016 among stroke survivors who were subsequently followed up until death or censored on December 31, 2022. Sleep duration was estimated as the difference between wake-up time and bedtime to which was subtracted the time spent in bed without sleep. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to investigate the association between sleep duration and all-cause mortality adjusting for demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, behavioral factors, and co-morbidities. RESULTS: A total of 468 non-Hispanic Black and White stroke survivors were included in this analysis. The mean age was 76.3 years, 52.6% were females and 56.0% were non-Hispanic White individuals. The distribution of short (≤6 h), adequate (7.0-8.9 h), and long sleep (≥9 h) was 30.3%, 44.7%, and 25%, respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 5.0 years, 190 (40.6%) deaths occurred. Compared to stroke survivors with adequate sleep (7.0-8.9 h), stroke survivors with long sleep (≥9 h) were at increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.46, 95% CI=1.01, 2.12). However, short sleep (≤6 h) was not significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.31, 95% CI=0.90, 1.91). Subgroup analyses indicated higher risk in the age <75 years, females, non-Hispanic Black individuals, and those living in the Stroke Belt region, but those differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In this study of stroke survivors, 9 hours or more of sleep per day was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. This finding suggests that excessive sleep duration may be a warning sign of poor life expectancy in stroke survivors.

Life-Space Mobility: Normative Values From a National Cohort of U.S. Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Life-space mobility, which measures the distance, frequency, and independence achieved as individuals move through their community, is one of the most important contributors to healthy aging. The University of Alabama at Birmingham Life-Space Assessment (LSA) is the most commonly used measure of life-space mobility in older adults, yet U.S. national norms for LSA have not previously been reported. This study reports such norms based on age and sex among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis using data from the national REasons for Geographic and Racial Disparities in Stroke cohort study. LSA data were available for 10 118 Black and White participants over age 50, which were grouped by age (in 5-year increments) and sex, weighted for the U.S. national population. Correlations were calculated between LSA and measures of functional and cognitive impairment and physical performance. RESULTS: The weighted mean LSA ranged from 102.9 for 50-54-year-old males to 69.5 for males aged 85 and older, and from 102.1 for 50-54-year-old females to 60.1 for females aged 85 and older. LSA was strongly correlated with measures of timed walking, activities of daily living, cognition, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We report U.S. national norms for LSA among community-dwelling Black and White older adults. These norms can serve as a reference tool for determining if clinical and research samples have greater or lesser life-space mobility than typical older adults in the United States for their age and sex.

Comparative Discrimination of Life's Simple 7 and Life's Essential 8 to Stratify Cardiovascular Risk: Is the Added Complexity Worth It?

BACKGROUND: Life's Simple 7 (LS7) is an easily calculated and interpreted metric of cardiovascular health based on 7 domains: smoking, diet, physical activity, body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol, and fasting glucose. The Life's Essential 8 (LE8) metric was subsequently introduced, adding sleep metrics and revisions of the previous 7 domains. Although calculating LE8 requires additional information, we hypothesized that it would be a more reliable index of cardiovascular health. METHODS: Both the LS7 and LE8 metrics yield scores with higher values indicating lower risk. These were calculated among 11 609 Black and White participants free of baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study, enrolled in 2003 to 2007, and followed for a median of 13 years. Differences in 10-year risk of incident CVD (coronary heart disease or stroke) were calculated as a function LS7, and LE8 scores were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards analyses. Differences in incident CVD discrimination were quantified by difference in the c-statistic. RESULTS: For both LS7 and LE8, the 10-year risk was approximately 5% for participants around the 99th percentile of scores, and a 4× higher 20% risk for participants around the first percentile. Comparing LS7 to LE8, 10-year risk was nearly identical for individuals at the same relative position in score distribution. For example, the "cluster" of 2013 participants with an LS7 score of 7 was at the 35.8th percentile in distribution of LS7 scores, and had an estimated 10-year CVD risk of 8.4% (95% CI, 7.2%-9.8%). In a similar location in the LE8 distribution, the 1457 participants with an LE8 score of 60±2.5 at the 39.4th percentile of LE8 scores had a 10-year risk of CVD of 8.5% (95% CI, 7.1%-10.1%), similar to the cluster defined by LS7. The age-race-sex adjusted c-statistic of the LS7 model was 0.691 (95% CI, 0.667-0.705), and 0.695 for LE8 (95% CI, 0.681-0.709) (P for difference, 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Both LS7 and LE8 were associated with incident CVD, with discrimination of the 2 indices practically indistinguishable. As a simpler metric, LS7 may be favored for use by the general population and clinicians.

Association between psychosocial factors and C-reactive protein across income, race, and sex.

OBJECTIVE: A health disparity is a health difference that adversely affects disadvantaged populations, and thus could plausibly be due to social factors. Biopsychosocial processes that contribute to health disparities are not well-understood. Establishing whether candidate biomarkers are similarly associated with biologically relevant psychosocial constructs across health disparity groups is a current gap in our understanding. METHOD: This study examined associations between perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and social support with C-reactive protein (CRP) and whether associations varied by race, sex, or income in 24,395 Black and White adults aged 45 years or older from the REGARDS population-based national cohort. RESULTS: The association between depressive symptoms and CRP was slightly larger at higher (vs. lower) income levels and larger for men (vs. women) but did not vary by race. Associations between stress and CRP and social support and CRP were not moderated by income, race, or sex. An interaction between race and income, evidenced that higher income was more strongly associated with lower CRP in White participants compared to Black participants, consistent with the idea of "diminishing returns" of income for the health of Black Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Basic associations between these psychosocial factors and CRP are small and generally similar across income, race, and sex. Black and lower-income Americans likely evidence higher CRP due to greater exposure to psychosocial risk factors rather than increased biological vulnerability to these exposures. Additionally, given small associations, CRP should not be used as a proxy for the construct of psychosocial stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Changes in Adiposity and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: The REGARDS Study.

OBJECTIVES: Adiposity may have a role in the risk of dementia. Fewer studies have focused on the relationship between change in adiposity and cognitive decline. Our study aimed to explore the association between the change in adiposity and cognitive function in Black and White older adults. METHODS: The participants were 12,204 older adults without cognitive impairment (62.8 ±â€…8.0 years) in the United States. The percent body mass index change (%BMI change) and percent waist circumference change (%WC change) were measured at 2 in-home visits (first: 2003-2007, second: 2013-2016). Cognitive status was assessed by the Six-Item Screener annually. Memory and executive function were measured by word list learning, MOCA recall and orientation, and letter and animal fluency every 2 years. Logistic regression or linear regression models were used to estimate the relationship between percent change in adiposity and cognitive function. RESULTS: After 12.7 ±â€…1.7 years, a greater decrease in %BMI change or %WC change was significantly associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment. Compared to older adults with -5% ≤ change ≤ 5% from baseline, a significantly higher risk of cognitive impairment and greater loss in memory and executive function were found among those who experienced more than a 10% decline in %BMI change or %WC change. Older adults who experienced a 5%-10% decrease in %BMI change had a higher risk of cognitive impairment and greater loss of memory compared to those with -5% ≤ change ≤ 5%. DISCUSSION: A greater decrease in %BMI (>5%) and %WC (>10%) change was associated with greater cognitive loss observed over time.

Association of educational attainment with cancer mortality in a national cohort study of black and white adults: A mediation analysis.

Background: Low educational attainment is associated with excess cancer mortality. However, the mechanisms driving this association remain unknown. Methods: Using data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, we evaluated the associations of participant and parental/caregiver education with cancer mortality using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and health conditions. We used principal components analysis to generate indices of measures representing the social determinants of health (SDOH) and health behaviors. We used structural equation modeling to determine if the association between educational attainment and cancer mortality was mediated by these domains. Results: Among 30,177 REGARDS participants included in this analysis, 3798 (12.6%) had less than a high school degree. In fully adjusted models, those without a high school education experienced about 50% greater risk of death than high school graduates and higher (White participants HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.76 and Black HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.33, 1.79). There was evidence of a modest mediation effect for the association between education and cancer mortality by the SDOH domain score (White total effect HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.33, indirect effect HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.05, direct effect HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.28 and Black total effect HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.29, indirect effect HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.05, direct effect HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.24). There was no evidence of mediation by the health behaviors score. No significant associations were found for female caregiver/mother's or male caregiver/father's education (N = 13,209). Conclusions: In conclusion, participant education was strongly associated with cancer mortality, and this association was partially mediated by the SDOH domain score.

History of obstructive sleep apnea associated with incident cognitive impairment in white but not black individuals in a US national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a history of OSA, and/or treatment of OSA has a different association with incident cognitive impairment or cognitive decline in Black individuals and White individuals. METHODS: To determine whether the risk for OSA, a history of OSA, and/or treatment of OSA has a different association with incident cognitive impairment or cognitive decline in Black individuals and White individuals; data from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) was used. Participants that completed the sleep questionnaire module, had baseline cognitive assessment, and at least one cognitive assessment during follow-up were included. Risk of OSA was determined based on Berlin Sleep Questionnaire. History of sleep apnea was determined based on structured interview questions. Optimally treated OSA was defined as treated sleep apnea as at least 4 h of continuous positive airway pressure use per night for ≥5 nights per week. RESULTS: In 19,017 participants stratified by race, White participants with history of OSA were 1.62 times more likely to have incident cognitive impairment compared to White participants without history of OSA after adjusting for demographic characteristics, history, and lifestyle factors (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.05-2.50, p-value = 0.03). This relationship was not seen in Black participants (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.60-1.43, p-value = 0.72). DISCUSSION: A previous diagnosis of OSA is associated with incident cognitive impairment in White Americans but not Black Americans. Further investigations are required to determine the mechanism for this difference.

Shiftwork, long working hours and markers of inflammation in a national US population-based sample of employed black and white men and women aged ≥45 years.

OBJECTIVES: Work schedule demands contribute to circadian disruption and may influence health via an inflammatory response. We examined the impact of shiftwork and long work hours on inflammation in a national US sample. METHODS: Participants included 12 487 employed black and white men and women aged ≥45 years enrolled in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study who completed an occupational questionnaire (2011-2013) and clinical examination (2013-2016). Cross-sectional associations between shiftwork and work hours with log-transformed high-sensitivity C reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) count were examined by multiple linear regression analysis, overall and by race-sex subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, rotating shift workers had higher log-CRP concentration compared with day workers (ß=0.09, 95% CI:0.02 to 0.16) and findings for WBC were null. Black women had the highest geometric mean CRP (2.82 mg/L), while white men had the highest WBC (6.35×109/L). White men who worked afternoons had higher log-CRP compared with those who worked days (ß=0.20, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.33). Black men engaged in shiftwork <10 years working ≥55 hours/week had higher log-CRP and log-WBC compared with those working days <55 hours/week (ß=0.33, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.64 and ß=0.10, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.19). Among shift workers, non-retired white women working forward and backward shift rotations had higher log-CRP compared with those working forward only (ß=0.49, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Shift workers had higher inflammatory markers compared with day workers and race-sex disparities should be examined further. These findings highlight a potential biological pathway linking work schedule demands and chronic disease.

Birth in the U.S. Plantation South and Racial Differences in all-cause mortality in later life.

The American South has been characterized as a Stroke Belt due to high cardiovascular mortality. We examine whether mortality rates and race differences in rates reflect birthplace exposure to Jim Crow-era inequalities associated with the Plantation South. The plantation mode of agricultural production was widespread through the 1950s when older adults of today, if exposed, were children. We use proportional hazards models to estimate all-cause mortality in Non-Hispanic Black and White birth cohorts (1920-1954) in a sample (N = 21,941) drawn from REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS), a national study designed to investigate Stroke Belt risk. We link REGARDS data to two U.S. Plantation Censuses (1916, 1948) to develop county-level measures that capture the geographic overlap between the Stroke Belt, two subregions of the Plantation South, and a non-Plantation South subregion. Additionally, we examine the life course timing of geographic exposure: at birth, adulthood (survey enrollment baseline), neither, or both portions of life. We find mortality hazard rates higher for Black compared to White participants, regardless of birthplace, and for the southern-born compared to those not southern-born, regardless of race. Race-specific models adjusting for adult Stroke Belt residence find birthplace-mortality associations fully attenuated among White-except in one of two Plantation South subregions-but not among Black participants. Mortality hazard rates are highest among Black and White participants born in this one Plantation South subregion. The Black-White mortality differential is largest in this birthplace subregion as well. In this subregion, the legacy of pre-Civil War plantation production under enslavement was followed by high-productivity plantation farming under the southern Sharecropping System.

Alpha globin gene copy number and incident ischemic stroke risk among Black Americans.

Introduction: People with African ancestry have greater stroke risk and greater heritability of stroke risk than people of other ancestries. Given the importance of nitric oxide (NO) in stroke, and recent evidence that alpha globin restricts nitric oxide release from vascular endothelial cells, we hypothesized that alpha globin gene (HBA) deletion would be associated with reduced risk of incident ischemic stroke. Methods: We evaluated 8,947 participants self-reporting African ancestry in the national, prospective Reasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort. Incident ischemic stroke was defined as non-hemorrhagic stroke with focal neurological deficit lasting ≥ 24 hours confirmed by the medical record or focal or non-focal neurological deficit with positive imaging confirmed with medical records. Genomic DNA was analyzed using droplet digital PCR to determine HBA copy number. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of HBA copy number on time to first ischemic stroke. Results: Four-hundred seventy-nine (5.3%) participants had an incident ischemic stroke over a median (IQR) of 11.0 (5.7, 14.0) years' follow-up. HBA copy number ranged from 2 to 6: 368 (4%) -α/-α, 2,480 (28%) -α/αα, 6,014 (67%) αα/αα, 83 (1%) ααα/αα and 2 (<1%) ααα/ααα. The adjusted HR of ischemic stroke with HBA copy number was 1.04; 95%CI 0.89, 1.21; p = 0.66. Conclusions: Although a reduction in HBA copy number is expected to increase endothelial nitric oxide signaling in the human vascular endothelium, HBA copy number was not associated with incident ischemic stroke in this large cohort of Black Americans.

Methods of a Study to Assess the Contribution of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Dementia Risk Alleles to Racial Disparities in Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.

Background Non-Hispanic Black adults have a higher proportion of vascular cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias compared with non-Hispanic White adults that may be due to differences in the burden of cerebral small vessel disease and risk alleles for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. We describe here the methods of an ancillary study to the REGARDS (Reason for Geographic and and Racial Difference in Stroke) study, which will examine the role of magnetic resonance imaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease and vascular as well as genetic risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in racial disparity in the prevalence and trajectory of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia in non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black participants. Methods In participants with no prior history of stroke who had an incident stroke or transient ischemic attack after enrollment in the study, magnetic resonance imaging scans will be evaluated using the Standards for Reporting Vascular Changes on Neuroimaging international consensus criteria and automated analysis pipelines for quantification of cerebral small vessel disease. Participants will be genotyped for APOE ε4 and TREM2 risk alleles for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. The 6-item screener will define global cognitive function and be the primary cognitive outcome. Conclusions With at least 426 non-Hispanic Black and 463 non-Hispanic White participants who have at least 2 prior and 2 poststroke or transient ischemic attack cognitive assessments, we will have at least 80% power to detect a minimum effect size of 0.09 SD change in Z score, with correction for as many as 20 tests (ie, at P<0.0025, after adjusting for up to 20 covariates) for cognitive decline.

Health Disparities Research Curricula and Training Development: Recommendations From a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workgroup.

The national mandate to improve health equity in the United Sates is advancing. Racial and ethnic disparities in various aspects of health care have been clearly delineated, and sources of such disparities have been identified. However, implementing solution-focused interventions to eradicate such disparities, thereby achieving health equity in all US communities, has remained a daunting challenge, and no area more so, than with neurologic diseases. To assure success with bridging prominent disparities in neurologic outcomes, the pipeline of neurologic disparities researchers needs to be broadened, numbers of mid-career and senior disparities scientists sustained, partnerships with community stakeholders enhanced, incentivization of academic organizations pursued, education of all neurologic researchers conducted, and exemplary training of funding agency staff prioritized. To improve the current state of neurologic disparities, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke assembled a working group of its advisory council. (2020-2022) to examine the state of health disparity training and research. Through consensus building, we present identified gaps and recommendations to the current state of underrepresented groups in medicine in health disparity research and its training and curricula in the United States.