Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Acute Med ; 21(1): 34-42, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35342908

RESUMO

Gastric-bypass associated hyperammonaemia (GaBHA) is an under-recognised cause of non-hepatic encephalopathy that is associated with significant mortality and has limited reporting in published literature. GaBHA has been reported predominately in middle-aged females with a past surgical history of Roux-En-Y surgical procedure. Individuals may present at any stage post-surgery and an important minority may have an undiagnosed inherited metabolic disorder. We report a case of a 49 year old woman who presented acutely with encephalopathy, a significantly elevated plasma ammonia level, and substantial multifactorial nutritional deficiency which required correction with intensive enteral and parenteral nutritional support. This case represented a diagnostic and management challenge for acute medical physicians and the multidisciplinary team involved.


Assuntos
Encefalopatias , Derivação Gástrica , Desnutrição , Encefalopatias/etiologia , Feminino , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Desnutrição/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 56(2): 215-224, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625225

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To perform individual record linkage of women undergoing screening with cell-free DNA (cfDNA), combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), second-trimester serum screening (STSS), and/or prenatal and postnatal cytogenetic testing with the aim to (1) obtain population-based estimates of utilization of prenatal screening and invasive diagnosis, (2) analyze the performance of different prenatal screening strategies, and (3) report the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality following a low-risk aneuploidy screening result. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women residing in the state of Victoria, Australia, who underwent prenatal screening or invasive prenatal diagnosis in 2015. Patient-funded cfDNA referrals from multiple providers were merged with state-wide results for government-subsidized CFTS, STSS and invasive diagnostic procedures. Postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were obtained to ascertain cases of false-negative screening results and atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Individual record linkage was performed using LinkageWizTM . RESULTS: During the study period, there were 79 140 births and 66 166 (83.6%) women underwent at least one form of aneuploidy screening. Linkage data were complete for 93.5% (n = 61 877) of women who underwent screening, and of these, 73.2% (n = 45 275) had CFTS alone, 20.2% (n = 12 486) had cfDNA alone; 5.3% (n = 3268) had STSS alone, 1.3% (n = 813) had both CFTS and cfDNA, and < 0.1% (n = 35) had both STSS and cfDNA. CFTS had a combined sensitivity for trisomies 21 (T21), 18 (T18) and 13 (T13) of 89.57% (95% CI, 82.64-93.93%) for a screen-positive rate (SPR) of 2.94%. There were 12 false-negative results in the CFTS pathway, comprising 10 cases of T21, one of T18 and one of T13. cfDNA had a combined sensitivity for T21, T18 and T13 of 100% (95% CI, 95.00-100%) for a SPR of 1.21%. When high-risk cfDNA results for any chromosome (including the sex chromosomes) and failed cfDNA tests were treated as screen positives, the SPR for cfDNA increased to 2.42%. The risk of any major chromosomal abnormality (including atypical abnormalities) detected on prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing after a low-risk screening result was 1 in 1188 for CFTS (n = 37) and 1 in 762 for cfDNA (n = 16) (P = 0.13). The range of chromosomal abnormalities detected after a low-risk cfDNA result included pathogenic copy-number variants (n = 6), triploidy (n = 3), rare autosomal trisomies (n = 3) and monosomy X (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Our state-wide record-linkage analysis delineated the utilization and clinical performance of the multitude of prenatal screening pathways available to pregnant women. The sensitivity of cfDNA for T21, T18 and T13 was clearly superior to that of CFTS. While there was no statistically significant difference in the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality after a low-risk CFTS or cfDNA result, there were fewer live infants diagnosed with a major chromosomal abnormality in the cfDNA cohort. These data provide valuable population-based evidence to inform practice recommendations and health policies. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Aberrações Cromossômicas/embriologia , Transtornos Cromossômicos/diagnóstico , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Aneuploidia , Transtornos Cromossômicos/embriologia , Análise Citogenética/métodos , Análise Citogenética/estatística & dados numéricos , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Registro Médico Coordenado , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/genética , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Vitória
4.
Hum Immunol ; 61(4): 419-24, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10715519

RESUMO

The National Kidney Matching Scheme (NKMS) allows matching and allocation of donor organs throughout Australia. Sera from potential recipients are distributed to each interstate tissue typing laboratory on a monthly basis for crossmatching in the event of a cadaver donor. Therefore, it is essential there is consensus for results between these laboratories in order for donated organs to be allocated appropriately. A quality control program conducted under the auspices of ASEATTA was undertaken for (1) panel reactive antibody characterization; (2) routine T lymphocyte crossmatching; and (3) characterization of antibody isotype by DTT treatment. These aims were achieved by distribution of (1) six sera for the determination of PRA activity; (2) 20 scrambled trays including replicate dilutions of a strongly positive lymphocytotoxic serum, high titer monoclonal antibody and negative sera and; (3) 20 trays containing sera with IgG and/or IgM antibodies. These were then evaluated by each laboratory on a panel of T cells. There was concordance between laboratories for PRA levels and antibody characterization. However, there was considerable variation in crossmatch sensitivity and reproducibility, several laboratories had carryover and others could not detect weak IgM antibodies. These results demonstrate the utility and need for ongoing crossmatch exchange programs, particularly for laboratories participating in organ exchange programs.


Assuntos
Teste de Histocompatibilidade/normas , Transplante de Rim/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Ditiotreitol/farmacologia , Reações Falso-Positivas , Antígenos HLA/análise , Antígenos HLA/sangue , Teste de Histocompatibilidade/métodos , Humanos , Soros Imunes/análise , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...