The treatment of open and/or unstable tibial fractures with an unreamed double-locked tibial nail.

A multicenter, prospective study was conducted to assess the efficacy of an unreamed, double-locked tibial nail for the acute management of open and/or unstable tibial fractures. Seventy-seven acute unstable and/or open tibial fractures in 74 patients were treated from December 1986 to February 1989. Forty fractures were closed and 37 were open; 25% occurred in polytraumatized patients and 39% of the patients had additional fractures. All closed tibial fractures healed at an average of 14.2 weeks; 94.6% of the open tibial fractures healed at an average of 20.1 weeks. There were no infections in the closed tibial fracture group. There were 4 infections among the 37 patients (11%) in the open tibial fracture group, 2 superficial and 2 deep. There were 7 problems intraoperatively (8.4%) with fin deployment: 2 fins bent during nail insertion, 4 fins penetrated the cortex, while 1 set of fins only partially deployed. Difficulty was encountered with proximal screw insertion in one third of the cases. Considering the high energy of these injuries, the treatment of open and/or unstable tibial fractures with an unreamed, double-locked tibial nail can offer the surgeon a high rate of union (97%) with minimal complications. The low infection rate found in this series indicates that this nail may be of particular benefit in the treatment of closed and select open tibial fractures.

Comparative fatigue strengths and stabilities of metacarpal internal fixation techniques.

To study quantitative differences in the fatigue strength and stability obtained with 5 types of internal fixation of metacarpal fractures, 105 preserved human metacarpals were cyclically tested in bending, torsion, and axial loading after oblique osteotomies of the metacarpal and internal fixation. The dorsal plate with lag screw was superior in all modes, followed by the two dorsal lag screws, crossed Kirschner wire tension banding, and intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation. The five intramedullary and the paired intramedullary Kirschner wire fixations were not statistically different. The fatigue life of the plate fixation was significantly larger in bending (1.5 times), torsion (1.6 times), and axial loading (2.5 times) than the second strongest fixation, two dorsal lag screws. Its initial rigidity was significantly higher in axial loading (1.5 times) but was not statistically different in bending and torsion.

Limb salvage versus amputation. Preliminary results of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.

Objective criteria can predict amputation after lower-extremity trauma. The authors examined the hypothesis that objective data, available early in the evaluation of patients with severe skeletal/soft-tissue injuries of the lower extremity with vascular compromise, might discriminate the salvageable from the unsalvageable limbs. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was developed by reviewing 25 trauma victims with 26 severe lower-extremity open fractures with vascular compromise. The four significant criteria (with increasing points for worsening prognosis) were skeletal/soft-tissue injury, limb ischemia, shock, and patient age. (There was a significant difference in the mean MESS scores; 4.88 in 17 limbs salvaged and 9.11 in nine limbs amputated; p less than 0.01). This scoring system was then prospectively evaluated in 26 lower-extremity open fractures with vascular injury over a 12-month period at two trauma centers. Again, there was a significant difference in the mean MESS scores; 4.00 for the 14 salvaged limbs and 8.83 for the 12 amputated limbs (p less than 0.01). In both the prospective and retrospective studies, a MESS score of greater than or equal to 7 had a 100% predictable value for amputation. This relatively simple, readily available scoring system of objective criteria was highly accurate in acutely discriminating between limbs that were salvageable and those that were unsalvageable and better managed by primary amputation.

Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma.

MESS (Mangled Extremity Severity Score) is a simple rating scale for lower extremity trauma, based on skeletal/soft-tissue damage, limb ischemia, shock, and age. Retrospective analysis of severe lower extremity injuries in 25 trauma victims demonstrated a significant difference between MESS values for 17 limbs ultimately salvaged (mean, 4.88 +/- 0.27) and nine requiring amputation (mean, 9.11 +/- 0.51) (p less than 0.01). A prospective trial of MESS in lower extremity injuries managed at two trauma centers again demonstrated a significant difference between MESS values of 14 salvaged (mean, 4.00 +/- 0.28) and 12 doomed (mean, 8.83 +/- 0.53) limbs (p less than 0.01). In both the retrospective survey and the prospective trial, a MESS value greater than or equal to 7 predicted amputation with 100% accuracy. MESS may be useful in selecting trauma victims whose irretrievably injured lower extremities warrant primary amputation.