Effect of soy isoflavone protein and soy lecithin on endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of soy isoflavone protein concentrate and soy lecithin on endothelial function, measured as flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery in healthy postmenopausal women. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with 25 participants (mean age, 61 years; body mass index, 25.46 kg/m2). The women underwent endothelial function testing at baseline and after 4 weeks of randomly assigned treatment with intervening 4-week washout periods. Treatment assignments included soy isoflavone protein (25 g/day) and soy lecithin (20 g/day), soy isoflavone protein (25 g/day) and placebo lecithin, placebo protein and soy lecithin (20 g/day), and double placebo. FMD and serum lipid levels were assessed at baseline and the end of each 4-week treatment phase. RESULTS: Twenty-two women completed the trial. No statistically significant (P > 0.05) difference was seen in FMD between treatment groups. A trend was suggested with FMD highest after treatment with soy protein plus lecithin (7.50 +/- 9.85), followed by soy protein (5.51 +/- 10.11), soy lecithin (5.35 +/- 6.13), and lowest after placebo (4.53 +/- 7.84). Soy isoflavone protein and soy lecithin significantly increased the high-density lipoprotein/low-density lipoprotein ratio (soy isoflavone protein plus soy lecithin, 0.64 +/- 0.19, P < 0.0001; soy isoflavone protein plus placebo lecithin, 0.58 +/- 0.17, P = 0.0058; placebo protein plus soy lecithin, 0.65 +/- 0.18, P < 0.0001) relative to the baseline value (0.49 +/- 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of healthy postmenopausal women, soy isoflavone protein and soy lecithin significantly improved the lipid profile. A favorable influence on endothelial function could not be confirmed.

Egg consumption and endothelial function: a randomized controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Because of egg cholesterol content, reduction in egg consumption is generally recommended to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, however, evidence has been accumulating to suggest that dietary cholesterol is less relevant to cardiovascular risk than dietary saturated fat. This randomized controlled crossover trial was conducted to determine the effects of egg ingestion on endothelial function, a reliable index of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Forty-nine healthy adults (mean age 56 years, 40% females) underwent a baseline brachial artery reactivity study (BARS), and were assigned to two eggs or oats daily for 6 weeks in random sequence with a 4-week washout. A BARS was done at the end of each treatment phase, measuring flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery using a high-frequency ultrasound. RESULTS: FMD was stable in both egg and oat groups, and between-treatment differences were not significant (egg -0.96%, oatmeal -0.79%; p value >0.05). Six weeks of egg ingestion had no effect on total cholesterol (baseline: 203.8 mg/dl; post-treatment: 205.3) or LDL (baseline: 124.8 mg/dl; post-treatment: 129.1). In contrast, 6 weeks of oats lowered total cholesterol (to 194 mg/dl; p = 0.0017) and LDL (to 116.6 mg/dl; p = 0.012). There were no differences in body mass index (BMI), triglyceride, HDL or SBP levels between egg and oat treatment assignments. CONCLUSION: Short-term egg consumption does not adversely affect endothelial function in healthy adults, supporting the view that dietary cholesterol may be less detrimental to cardiovascular health than previously thought.

Oats, antioxidants and endothelial function in overweight, dyslipidemic adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of oat and antioxidant vitamin (C 500 mg, E 400 IU) ingestion on endothelial function in overweight, dyslipidemic adults. DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial Intervention(s): Subjects (16 males > or = age 35; 14 postmenopausal females) were assigned, in random order, to oats (60 g oatmeal), vitamin E (400 IU) plus vitamin C (500 mg), the combination of oats and vitamins, or placebo, and underwent brachial artery reactivity scans (BARS) following a single dose of each treatment, and again following 6 weeks of daily ingestion, with 2-week washout periods. At each test, a provocation high-fat meal (50 g, predominantly saturated) was administered and subjects were scanned pre, and 3 hours post-ingestion. RESULTS: Mean flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD; measured as percent diameter change before and after treatments) at baseline was 6.35 +/- 3.37. Oats increased FMD non-significantly (p > 0.05) with both single acute dose (from 6.07 +/- 6.25 to 9.22 +/- 8.82) and six weeks of sustained treatment (from 6.01 +/- 10.07 to 8.69 +/- 8.42). The direction of effect was negative for vitamins and the oat/vitamin combination with both acute and sustained treatment. There were no significant differences in FMD change among the treatments in either phase of the study, however when acute and sustained effects were pooled, oat treatment significantly augmented FMD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests but does not confirm a beneficial influence of oat ingestion on endothelial function in overweight, dyslipidemic adults. Further study of this potential association is warranted.