Minimally Invasive Anterior Decompression Technique without Instrumented Fusion for Huge Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Thoracic Spine: Technical Note And Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Several surgical methods have been reported for treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the thoracic spine. Despite rapid innovation of instruments and techniques for spinal surgery, the postoperative outcomes are not always favorable. This article reports a minimally invasive anterior decompression technique without instrumented fusion, which was modified from the conventional procedure. The authors present 2 cases of huge beak-type OPLL. Patients underwent minimally invasive anterior decompression without fusion. This method created a space on the ventral side of the OPLL without violating global thoracic spinal stability. Via this space, the OPLL and anterior lateral side of the dural sac can be seen and manipulated directly. Then, total removal of the OPLL was accomplished. No orthosis was needed. In this article, we share our key technique and concepts for treatment of huge thoracic OPLL. METHODS: Case 1. 51-year-old female was referred to our hospital with right lower limb radiating pain and paresis. Thoracic OPLL at T6-7 had been identified at our hospital, and conservative treatment had been tried without success. Case 2. This 54-year-old female with a 6-month history of progressive gait disturbance and bilateral lower extremity radiating pain (right>left) was admitted to our institute. She also had hypoesthesia in both lower legs. Her symptoms had been gradually progressing. Computed tomography scans showed massive OPLL at the T9-10 level. Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracolumbar spine demonstrated ventral bony masses with severe anterior compression of the spinal cord at the same level. RESULTS: We used this surgical method in 2 patients with a huge beaked-type OPLL in the thoracic level. Complete removal of the OPLL via anterior decompression without instrumented fusion was accomplished. The 1st case had no intraoperative or postoperative complications, and the 2nd case had 1 intraoperative complication (dural tear) and no postoperative complications. There were no residual symptoms of the lower extremities. CONCLUSION: This surgical technique allows the surgeon to safely and effectively perform minimally invasive anterior decompression without instrumented fusion via a transthoracic approach for thoracic OPLL. It can be applied at the mid and lower level of the thoracic spine and could become a standard procedure for treatment of huge beak-type thoracic OPLL.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for multiple-level isthmic spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis is rarely reported. Here, we report 23 consecutive patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPF) for multiple-level isthmic spondylolisthesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2008 through December 2014, multiple-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis was diagnosed in 23 patients (6 men, 17 women) at Wooridul Spine Hospital (Busan, South Korea). Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurred at three spinal levels in 2 patients and at two levels in 21 patients. All patients underwent ALIF with PPF. We used the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale scores to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative functional outcome, low back pain, and radicular pain. We also evaluated segmental lordosis and the fusion status using radiographs and data from computed tomography. RESULTS: Isthmic spondylolisthesis occurred from L3 to S1 and mostly occurred at two consecutive spinal levels (i.e., L4-L5 and L5-S1). Significant improvements in the ODI and visual analog scale were observed in patients at final follow up (p<0.05). The mean segmental lordosis significantly increased after operation (from 22.7° to 32.7°). The mean lumbar lordosis significantly increased after operation (from 45.8 to 53.1). Radiographs of all of the patients showed solid fusion at the last follow-up. There was one case of screw fracture at the S1 level; however, in this case the last follow-up radiograph exhibited solid fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with PPF can be an effective treatment choice and yield good clinical outcomes in patients with multiple-level isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy (PECD): An Analysis of Outcome, Causes of Reoperation.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) is regarded as an effective treatment modality in cervical disc herniation, including radicular pain and lateral location of disc herniation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of PECD along with the causes of reoperation and the technique itself. METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2012, 101 patients underwent PECD at the Busan Wooridul Hospital. Three patients underwent a 2-level PECD. The mean follow-up period was 34 months (range, 18-72 months). The mean age was 46.1 years; the most common operation was at the C5-C6 level (n = 45), followed by C6-C7 (n = 35), C4-C5 (n = 16), and C3-C4 (n = 8). The clinical outcomes were evaluated via the visual analog scale of the neck and arm according to the Neck Disability Index and the modified Macnab criteria. Among 101 patients, 12 underwent an additional operation at the index level. Five patients had aggravated stenosis by disc height narrowing, 4 had recurred disc, 2 had remained disc, and 1 had sustained symptoms. RESULTS: After PECD, there was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale and Neck Disability Index scores (P < 0.001). According to the modified Macnab criteria, excellent concordance was achieved in 65 patients, good in 22, fair in 2, and poor in 12. The reoperation performed on 12 patients improved their clinical outcomes. The mean duration was 4.8 months (2 days to 18 months) until reoperation. There were 3 PECD revisions, 3 artificial disc replacements, 2 corpectomies, 2 anterior cervical discectomies and fusion with cages, and 2 transfers to another hospital. The common feature was older age (P = 0.016) and male sex (P = 0.031). Preoperative radiologic findings were characterized by the foraminal disc (P = 0.04), disc degeneration at the index level (P = 0.05), combined bony spur (P = 0.001), concomitant adjacent level degeneration (P = 0.019), cervical kyphosis (P = 0.015), and segmental angle deterioration after PECD (P = 0.038). No statistical correlation was seen between the operation level and herniation size (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In total, 87% patients showed successful clinical outcome. Poor and fair outcomes at initial PECD were overcome by revision surgery, which improved outcomes. Although PECD is a promising minimally invasive procedure for cervical disc treatment, the indications for PECD should be considered carefully.

Ergonomics study on the handle length and lift angle for the culinary spatula.

The culinary spatula (turning shovel) is one of the most common cooking tools used in the kitchen in Asia. However, the culinary spatula has seldom been ergonomically investigated. When a person uses a spatula to cook food, the operations involve repetitive bent-wrist motions, such as dorsiflexion, palmary flexion, and radial and ulnar deviations. These movements may cause cumulative trauma disorders in the upper extremities, and in particular carpal tunnel syndrome. A poorly designed culinary spatula will be ergonomically inefficient and cause injury to the hand and wrist. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of spatula handle length and lift angle on food-frying, food-turning, and food-shoveling performance. Eight female subjects were tested using 16 different culinary spatulas, with four different handle lengths (20, 25, 30 and 35 cm) and four different lift angles (15 degrees, 25 degrees, 35 degrees and 45 ). The criterion measures included cooking performance, and rating of perceived exertion. The subjects ranked their preference after all of the tasks in the tests were completed. The results showed that: (1) The handle length had a significant influence on the cooking performance, and rating of perceived exertion. The optimal handle lengths for frying food, turning food, and shoveling food were 20, 25 and 25 cm, respectively. (2) The lift angle significantly affected the cooking performance, and rating of perceived exertion. The optimal lift angles for frying food, turning food, and shoveling food were 15 degrees, 15 degrees and 25 degrees, respectively. (3) Both the handle length and lift angle had significant effects on subjective preference. For the handle length, the 20 cm length was the best. For the lift angle, the 25 angle was the best. (4) In general, a spatula with a 20 cm handle length and 25 degrees lift angle was the best. A spatula with a 25 cm handle length and 15 lift angle was the second most preferred. (5) However, to prevent subjects from touching the edge of a hot pan, a spatula with a 25 cm handle length and 25 lift angle is suggested.