Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy versus emergency percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with sepsis associated with large uretero-pelvic junction stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT Introduction A randomized trial was conducted prospectively to evaluate the efficacy, related complications, and convalescence of emergency percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrostomy for decompression of the collecting system in cases of sepsis associated with large uretero-pelvic junction stone impaction. Materials and Methods The inclusion criteria included a WBC count of 10.000/mm3 or more and/or a temperature of 38°C or higher. Besides, all enrolled patients should maintain stable hemodynamic status and proper organ perfusions. A total of 113 patients with large, obstructive uretero-pelvic junction stones and clinical signs of sepsis completed the study protocol. Of those, 56 patients were placed in the emergency percutaneous nephrostomy group, while the other 57 patients were part of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. The primary end point was the time until normalization of white blood cells (WBC) at a count of 10.000/mm3 or less, and a temperature of 37.4°C or lower. The secondary end points included the comparison of analgesic consumption, length of stay, and related complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® version 14.0.1. The Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were used as appropriate. Results The length of hospital stays (in days) was 10.09±3.43 for the emergency percutaneous nephrostomy group and 8.18±2.72 for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. This set of data noted a significant difference between groups. There was no difference between groups in regard to white blood cell count (in mm3), time to normalization of white blood cell count (in days), body temperature (in ºC), time to normalization of body temperature (in days), C-reactive proteins (in mg/dL), time taken for C-reactive proteins to decrease over 25% (in days), procalcitonin (in ng/mL), or complication rates. Conclusions This study confirms that emergency percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be as safe as early percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a selected low risk patients with sepsis-associated large, obstructive stone.

Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy versus emergency percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with sepsis associated with large uretero-pelvic junction stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: A randomized trial was conducted prospectively to evaluate the efficacy, related complications, and convalescence of emergency percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrostomy for decompression of the collecting system in cases of sepsis associated with large uretero-pelvic junction stone impaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The inclusion criteria included a WBC count of 10.000/mm3 or more and/or a temperature of 38°C or higher. Besides, all enrolled patients should maintain stable hemodynamic status and proper organ perfusions. A total of 113 patients with large, obstructive uretero-pelvic junction stones and clinical signs of sepsis completed the study protocol. Of those, 56 patients were placed in the emergency percutaneous nephrostomy group, while the other 57 patients were part of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. The primary end point was the time until normalization of white blood cells (WBC) at a count of 10.000/mm3 or less, and a temperature of 37.4°C or lower. The secondary end points included the comparison of analgesic consumption, length of stay, and related complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® version 14.0.1. The Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. RESULTS: The length of hospital stays (in days) was 10.09±3.43 for the emergency percutaneous nephrostomy group and 8.18±2.72 for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. This set of data noted a significant difference between groups. There was no difference between groups in regard to white blood cell count (in mm3), time to normalization of white blood cell count (in days), body temperature (in ºC), time to normalization of body temperature (in days), C-reactive proteins (in mg/dL), time taken for C-reactive proteins to decrease over 25% (in days), procalcitonin (in ng/mL), or complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that emergency percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be as safe as early percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a selected low risk patients with sepsis-associated large, obstructive stone.

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial.

A randomized trial was conducted prospectively to evaluate the efficacy, related complications, and convalescence of emergent retrograde ureteroscopic management, instead of percutaneous nephrostomy for decompression of the collecting system in cases of sepsis associated with ureteral stone obstruction. A total of 107 patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation for ureteral stones completed the study protocol, 53 patients in the percutaneous nephrostomy group, and 54 patients in the emergent retrograde ureteroscopic management group. The primary end point was the time to normalization of WBC of 10,000/mm or less and temperature of 37.4 °C or less. The second end point was the comparison analgesic consumption, length of stay, and related complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS(®) version 14.0.1. The Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square test, and fisher's exact test was used as appropriate. The length of hospital stay (days) was 10.25 ± 3.53 and 8.24 ± 2.77 in the percutaneous nephrostomy group and emergent retrograde ureteroscopic management group, respectively, with significant difference (Table 2). However, patients in the emergent retrograde ureteroscopic management group had a significantly higher rate of s body temperature (°C). Meanwhile, the analgesic consumptions are 31.51 ± 11.16 and 40.00 ± 14.54 in the percutaneous nephrostomy group and emergent retrograde ureteroscopic management group, respectively, with significant difference. Our results show that it can be effectively and safely managed by retrograde ureteroscopic management combined with strong antibiotics in select clinical situations. Ureteroscopic management should no longer be considered a contraindication for the treatment of patients with sepsis associated with obstructing ureteral stones.

Successful medical treatment of an implant periapical lesion: a case report.

An implant periapical lesion (IPL) is an infectious-inflammatory alteration surrounding an implant apex. In the English literature, the treatments for IPL have all been surgical methods. We present a case of successful treatment of an IPL with medical methods. A 36-year-old man underwent placement of two implants in the molar region of the right mandible. About one month later, the patient had pain at the surgical site and radiolucencies at the apical portion of the two implants on radiographs. Systemic antibiotic treatment with amoxicillin and acetaminophen was instituted, but the symptoms did not improve. The medications were changed to prednisolone, augmentin and mefenamic acid and the patient's symptoms completely subsided. This case was successfully treated using medical methods. The IPL disappeared on radiography and there were no symptoms or signs of recurrence at the 2-year follow up. We report a successful case of an IPL using medical methods. However, additional data are certainly necessary for a more comprehensive understanding of the etiopathologic and clinical problems related to an IPL.

Serum and pleural fluid procalcitonin in predicting bacterial infection in patients with parapneumonic effusion.

This study evaluated the value of procalcitonin (PCT) levels in pleural effusion to differentiate the etiology of parapneumonic effusion (PPE). Forty-one consecutive PPE patients were enrolled and were divided into bacterial and non-bacterial PPE. Blood and pleural effusion samples were collected for PCT measurement on admission and analyzed for diagnostic evaluation. PCT of pleural fluid was significantly increased in the bacterial PPE group (0.24 ng/mL) compared to the non-bacterial PPE group (0.09 ng/mL), but there was no significant difference for serum PCT. A PCT concentration of pleural fluid >0.174 ng/mL (best cut-off value) was considered positive for a diagnosis of bacterial PPE (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 76%; AUC, 0.84). Pleural effusion PCT in the bacterial PPE is significantly different from those of the non-bacterial PPE and control groups, so the diagnostic use of PCT still warrants further investigation.