Use and impact of a novel nurse-led consultation model in a palliative care consultation service for terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan: an 11-year observational study.

PURPOSE: The early integration of palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients improves quality of life. We have developed a new nurse-led consultation model for use in a palliative care consultation service (PCCS) to initiate early palliative care for cancer patients. METHODS: In this 11-year observational study, data were collected from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH). Terminally ill cancer patients who had received PCCS during the years 2011 to 2021 were enrolled. Trend analysis was performed in order to evaluate differences in outcomes seen within the categories of either a nurse-led consultation model or ordinary consultation model throughout the study period. Analysis included studying the duration of PCCS and DNR declaration, as well as awareness of disease by both patients and families before and after PCCS. RESULTS: In total, 6923 cancer patients with an average age of 64.1 years received PCCS from 2011 to 2021, with the average duration of PCCS being 11.1 days. Three thousand four hundred twenty-one patients (49.4%) received both a nurse consultation and doctor consultation during PCCS. Being admitted to the Department of Hematology, a longer duration of hospitalization, a DNR declaration after PCCS, and having had a PCCS consultation by a nurse only or both with a nurse and a doctor were significant determinants of a PCCS duration of more than 7 days. CONCLUSION: This 11-year observational study shows that the number of terminal cancer patients receiving a novel nurse-led consultation during PCCS has increased significantly during the past decade, while a nurse-led consultation model during PCCS was effective in improving the duration of PCCS among terminally ill cancer patients.

Terminally ill patients' and their relatives' experiences and behaviors regarding complementary and alternative medicine utilization in hospice palliative inpatient care units: a cross-sectional, multicenter survey.

BACKGROUND: Terminally ill patients often experience exacerbations of diseases that render mainstream medicine ineffective in relieving symptoms, prompting attempts at complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This study collected data from terminally ill patients and their relatives to determine differences between CAM use, behavioral patterns, and perceptions of health information about CAM. METHODS: A cross-sectional design using a self-administered questionnaire was adopted. Eight medical institutions in Taiwan with inpatient hospice palliative care units were chosen. Ninety-two terminally ill patients and 267 relatives met the inclusion criteria. The questions concerned the experience of CAM use, the kinds of products/services CAM provided, the purpose of CAM use, the source of CAM information, and the perceptions and attitudes toward CAM. RESULTS: Both terminally ill patients and their relatives have a high proportion of lifetime and one-year prevalence of CAM use (88.0% vs. 88.4%; p = 0.929). CAM use for musculoskeletal and neurological discomfort is higher among terminally ill patients than among their relatives. Relatives/friends are the most frequent sources of information on CAM (53.3% vs. 62.2%; p = 0.133). The percentage of terminally ill patients who discontinued mainstream medical treatment because of CAM use was higher than that of their relatives (18.5% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.026). More than half the terminally ill patients and their relatives had never been asked about CAM by medical staff (64.1% vs. 66.7%), nor had they informed medical professionals about the use of CAM products and services (63% vs. 66.9%). Random inquiries by medical professionals may be associated with increased disclosure of CAM use (terminally ill patients: odds ratio, 9.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-48.35 vs. relatives: odds ratio, 5.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.66-11.83). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence and concealment of CAM use in terminally ill patients should be considered. Medical professionals should establish a friendly and barrier-free communication model, encourage patients to share CAM experiences, and provide evidence-based information on the use of CAM products and services, to reduce the potential damage caused by harmful use.

Trend analysis of palliative care consultation service for terminally ill non-cancer patients in Taiwan: a 9-year observational study.

BACKGROUNDS: Early integration of palliative care for terminally ill non-cancer patients improves quality of life. However, there are scanty data on Palliative Care Consultation Service (PCCS) among non-cancer patients. METHODS: In this 9-year observational study Data were collected from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH). Terminally ill non-cancer patients with 9 categories of diagnoses who received PCCS during 2011 to 2019 were enrolled. Trend analysis was performed to evaluate differences in categories of diagnosis throughout study period, duration of PCCS, patient outcomes, DNR declaration, awareness of disease by patients and families before and after PCCS. RESULTS: In total, 536 non-cancer patients received PCCS from 2011 to 2019 with an average age of 70.7 years. The average duration of PCCS was 18.4 days. The distributions of age, gender, patient outcomes, family's awareness of disease before PCCS, and patient's awareness of disease after PCCS were significantly different among the diagnoses. Organic brain disease and Chronic kidney disease (CKD) were the most prevalent diagnoses in patients receiving PCCS in 2019. For DNR declaration, the percentage of patients signing DNR before PCCS remained high throughout the study period (92.8% in 2019). Patient outcomes varied according to the disease diagnoses. CONCLUSION: This 9-year observational study showed that the trend of PCCS among non-cancer patients had changed over the duration of the study. An increasing number of terminally ill non-cancer patients received PCCS during late life, thereby increasing the awareness of disease for both patients and families, which would tend to better prepare terminally ill patients for end-of-life as they may consider DNR consent. Early integration of PCCS into ordinary care for terminally non-cancer patients is essential for better quality of life.

Palliative Care Consultation Services on Terminally Ill Cancer Patients and Non-Cancer Patients: Trend Analysis from a 9-Year-Long Observational Study in Taiwan.

Early integration of palliative care for terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients improves quality of life. However, there are sparse data on results of palliative care consultation services (PCCS) between cancer and non-cancer patients. In this 9-year observational study, data were collected from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH). Terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients who received PCCS during 2011 to 2019 were enrolled. Trend analysis was performed to evaluate differences in outcomes of PCCS, including duration of PCCS, the awareness of disease of patients and families before and after PCCS, status of PCCS termination, and DNR declaration before and after PCCS among cancer and non-cancer patients throughout study period. In total, 5223 cancer patients and 536 non-cancer patients received PCCS from 2011 to 2019. The number of people who received PCCS increased stably over the decade, both for cancer and non-cancer patients. The average duration of PCCS for cancer and non-cancer patients was 21.4 days and 18.4 days, respectively. Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients had longer duration of PCCS, less DNR declaration (82% vs. 98%, respectively), and more transfers to the palliative care unit (17% vs. 11%, respectively), or for palliative home care (12% vs.8%, respectively). Determinants of late referral to PCCS includes age (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.987-0.996), DNR declaration after PCCS (OR 1.967, 95% CI 1.574-2.458), patients' awareness after PCCS (OR 0.754, 95% CI 0.635-0.895), and status of PCCS termination. This 9-year observational study showed that the trend of PCCS among cancer and non-cancer patients had changed over the duration of the study, and early integration of PCCS to all patients is essential for both cancer and non-cancer patients.

Professionals' experiences and attitudes toward use of Traditional Chinese Medicine in hospice palliative inpatient care units: A multicenter survey in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Medical staff may have difficulties in using conventional medicine to manage symptoms among terminally ill patients, including adverse effects of the treatment. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is regarded as a complementary or alternative medicine, and has been increasingly used in the field of palliative medicine in recent years. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of and attitudes toward using TCM among palliative care professionals, and to provide preliminary information about its use in palliative care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted in eight inpatient hospice wards in Taiwan between December 2014 and February 2016. The questionnaire was self-administered, and was analyzed with descriptive statistics including Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 251 palliative care professionals responded to the questionnaire, of whom 89.7% and 88.9% believed that the use of TCM could improve the physical symptoms and quality of life in terminally ill patients, respectively. Overall, 59.8%, of respondents suggested that TCM had rare side effects, and 58.2% were worried that TCM could affect the liver and kidney function of patients. In total, 89.7% and 88.0% of professionals agreed there were no suitable clinical practice guidelines and educational programs, respectively, for TCM use in palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the respondents agreed there was insufficient knowledge, skills-training, and continuing education on the use of TCM in terminally ill patients in Taiwan. These results show that to address patient safety considerations, guidelines about use of TCM in palliative care should be established.

Do-not-resuscitate status is correlated with the prescribed use of systemic strong opioid analgesics in patients with terminal cancer: an observational study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the possible correlation between the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status and the prescribed use of systemic strong opioid analgesics (SSOA) among patients with terminal cancer in Taiwan. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from a single tertiary care medical center. We identified patients with terminal cancer who died after signing a DNR order between 2008 and 2016. Subsequently, we reviewed their clinical characteristics, DNR consent type, survival time after DNR declaration, and SSOA dose. RESULTS: Of the 4123 patients enrolled for this study, 1380 (33.5%) had received SSOA before DNR and 2742 (66.5%) had received SSOA after DNR (p < 0.001). SSOA doses administered after the DNR order were significantly higher than those administered before the DNR order (median, 78 vs. 60 mg, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients' DNR status likely influenced physician decision in prescribing SSOA. However, additional studies are necessary to clarify the factors that influence the decision-making of physicians regarding SSOA prescription.

Factors affecting the place of death among hospice home care cancer patients in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Some patients who receive hospice home care still end up dying in hospital. The significance of the variables possibly affecting the place of death in patients with terminal cancer who received hospice home care was examined. METHODS: Retrospective study. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. In all, 60.8% of the patients died at home and 39.2% of the patients died in hospital. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that preferred place of death was the prior factor associated with home death, followed by average days of rehospitalization, education level, distance between home and hospital, and age. CONCLUSIONS: For a better hospice care service, it is essential to inquire patients or their relatives on preferred place of death while concerning the influences of other factors.

Effects of alendronate combined with hormone replacement therapy on osteoporotic postmenopausal Chinese women.

To evaluate the effect of alendronate combined with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on postmenopausal osteoporotic Chinese women living in Taiwan, we treated 151 women (age range, 47-70 years; mean, 61 years) with conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg), medroxyprogesterone 5 mg, and elemental calcium 500 mg daily with either alendronate 10 mg (n = 79) or placebo (n = 72), and measured their bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip every 6 months for 3 years. Urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen corrected by concentration of urine creatinine (NTx/Cr) and serum osteocalcin (OC) concentration was also measured at weeks 2, 4, and every 3 months from month 3 for 2 years. Significantly higher percentage increases in BMD at the lumbar spine (P < .0001, 2-way analysis of variance) throughout the 36-month treatment period were found in the alendronate plus HRT group than in the HRT-only group. However, there was no difference in BMD at the femoral neck and trochanter between these 2 groups. Treatment with alendronate plus HRT resulted in a 10.1% increase at the L-spine BMD and a 7.7% increase at the trochanter BMD at the end of the 3-year study period (P < .01, compared with baseline at both sites). A significant decline in urine NTx/Cr was observed at week 4 in the alendronate plus HRT group, whereas in the HRT-only group, a significant decline in urine NTx/Cr occurred at month 9. By the end of 24 months, urine NTx/Cr decreased by 49.7% in the alendronate plus HRT group (P = .001 compared with a 20.4% increase in the HRT group). A significant decline in serum OC level occurred at month 3 in the alendronate plus HRT group, whereas a similar decline was observed at month 6 in the HRT-only group. By the end of 24 months, serum OC decreased by 52.2% in the alendronate plus HRT group (P < .001 compared with a 1.5% increase in the HRT-only group). Subjects treated with alendronate plus HRT had a significantly greater percentage decrease in urine NTx/Cr (P = .0001) and serum OC (P = .0007) than subjects treated with HRT only throughout the 24-month treatment period by 2-way analysis of variance comparison. There was no difference in upper gastrointestinal or drug-related side effects between groups. In conclusion, our data suggest that the use of alendronate combined with HRT for 3 years was well tolerated and it significantly increased BMD at the L-spine and hip in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis. This regimen is safe and can be used in subjects who have no satisfactory response to a single agent or who have very low BMD with multiple risks. However, this study does not indicate whether HRT plus alendronate has any greater effect on BMD than alendronate alone.