RESUMO
Background: Defects in DNA damage repair can cause genetic mutations, which in turn can cause different types of cancers. Chromatin remodeling complexes, which help repair damaged DNA, can cause the chromatin structure to change as a result of DNA damage. ARID1A may play a role in the process of DNA damage repair, and arid1a may be related to the occurrence and development of gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of ARID1A regulating the DNA damage repair of gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines AGS and SGC-7901 and its effect on migration, proliferation and apoptosis. Methods: The expression of ARID1A plasmid was detected by Western blot and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The effect of etoposide (ETO) on the survival rate of AGS and SGC-7901 gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines was detected by MTT assay. The DNA double-strand break model was established by ETO and then passed through the comet assay and immunofluorescence co-localization to observe DNA damage; western blot method was used to detect the effect of ARID1A on the expression of related proteins in DNA damage repair pathway in gastric adenocarcinoma cells; scratch test and colony formation experiments were used to observe ARID1A migration and proliferation of gastric adenocarcinoma cells. The flow cytometry was used to detect the effect of ARID1A on apoptosis of gastric adenocarcinoma cells. Results: The expression of mRNA and protein was increased after transfection of ARID1A plasmid. ETO was confirmed by MTT assay to inhibit cell survival in a dose-dependent manner. After the DNA double-strand break model was established by ETO, the expression levels of phospho-ataxia telangiectasia mutated (p-ATM) protein increased in the overexpressed ARID1A group. Meanwhile, the overexpressed ARID1A group had a shortened tail moment, and γ-H2AX and ARID1A co-localized in the DNA damage site of the nucleus. The over-expressed ARID1A group had weaker wound healing ability, reduced number of clone formation, and increased apoptosis rate. Conclusions: ARID1A may repair DNA double-strand breaks caused by ETO by p-ATM pathway; ARID1A can inhibit the migration and proliferation of gastric adenocarcinoma cells and promote apoptosis. Our findings indicate that ARID1A could serve as a therapeutic target and biomarker for GC patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The association between paced LVAT and cardiac structure and function at baseline, as well as whether longer LVAT is associated with worse cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) has not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between paced LVAT and baseline echocardiographic parameters and cardiac reverse remodeling at follow-up. METHODS: Patients with HF and LBBB receiving successful left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) from June 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled and grouped based on paced LVAT. NT-proBNP and echocardiographic parameters were recorded during routine follow-up. The relationships between paced LVAT and echocardiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled (48 males, aged 65 ± 9.8, mean LVEF 32.1 ± 7.5%, mean LVEDD 63.0 ± 8.5 mm, median NT-proBNP 1057[513-3158] pg/mL). The paced QRSd was significantly decreased (177 ± 17.9 vs. 134 ± 18.5, p < .001) and median paced LVAT was 80[72-88] ms. After a median follow-up of 12[9-29] months, LVEF increased to 52.1 ± 11.2%, LVEDD decreased to 52.6 ± 8.8 mm, and NT-proBNP decreased to 215[73-532]pg/mL. Patients were grouped based on paced LVAT: LVAT < 80 ms (n = 39); 80 ≤ LVAT < 90 ms (n = 24); LVAT ≥ 90 ms (n = 20). Patients with longer LVAT had larger LVEDD and lower LVEF (LVEDDbaseline: p < .001; LVEFbaseline: p = .001). The difference in LVEF6M was statistically significant among groups (p < .001) and patients with longer LVAT had lower LVEF6M, while the difference in LVEF1Y was not seen (p = .090). There was no significant correlation between ΔLVEF6M-baseline, ΔLVEF1Y-6M and LVAT respectively (ΔLVEF6M-baseline: p = .261, r = -.126; ΔLVEF1Y-6M: p = .085, r = .218). CONCLUSION: Long paced LVAT was associated with worse echocardiographic parameters at baseline, but did not affect the cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with HF and LBBB. Those with longer LVAT required longer time to recover.
