Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 7(3): 434-8, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17059339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chinese American men have relatively high smoking rates. However, there are limited data about the tobacco-related knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of this racial/ethnic group. METHODS: We conducted a community-based telephone survey in Seattle, Washington during 2004. Households were identified by applying a previously validated list of Chinese last names to an electronic version of the Seattle telephone book. Interviews were completed in Cantonese, Mandarin, or English. Survey items addressed tobacco knowledge, cultural beliefs, and practices. RESULTS: The study sample included 168 Chinese American men. Current, former, and never smoking rates were 22%, 42%, and 36%, respectively. Current smokers were less likely to be proficient in English than never smokers, and were less likely to have a regular doctor than former smokers. They also had lower levels of knowledge about the health effects of tobacco, and were more likely to have traditional Chinese cultural beliefs about tobacco use than non-smokers. CONCLUSION: Tobacco use continues to be a public health problem among Chinese American men. Smoking cessation programs should target men with limited English proficiency and those without a regular source of health care. Educational materials should specifically address the negative health effects of smoking. They should also both acknowledge and address Chinese cultural beliefs about tobacco use.


Assuntos
Asiático , Características Culturais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Nicotiana/efeitos adversos , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Telefone , Washington
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 39(10): 1441-5, 2004 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15546079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the effect of maximal sterile barriers (MSBs) on reducing central venous catheter (CVC)--related infections. Use of MSBs when placing CVCs may reduce the risk of infections but is more cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive than other techniques. METHODS: We developed a decision analytic model in which a patient could have a CVC placed with either an MSB or a less stringent technique. We calculated total direct medical costs and the incidences of catheter-related bloodstream infections, catheter colonization, and death. RESULTS: Use of MSBs lowered costs (from 621 dollars to 369 dollars per catheter insertion) and decreased the incidences of catheter-related bloodstream infections (from 5.3% to 2.8%), catheter colonization with local infection (from 5.5% to 2.9%) and death (from 0.8% to 0.4%). MSBs improved patient safety throughout all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MSBs during CVC insertion likely lowers medical costs and decreases the incidences of catheter colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and death. Cost savings were found over a wide range of clinical and economic assumptions, suggesting that MSBs should be routinely used when CVCs are inserted.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecções/etiologia , Esterilização/economia , Esterilização/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 32(3): 142-6, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15153925

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related infections cause increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Infection control experts advocate using maximal sterile barriers to reduce the incidence of these infections. Low compliance rates suggest that clinicians are not convinced or are not aware that available data support adopting this more cumbersome, time-consuming, and relatively more expensive technique. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic, evidence-based review of the medical literature to determine the value of maximal sterile barriers. DATA SOURCES: We used multiple computerized databases, reference lists of identified articles, and queries of prominent investigators. STUDY SELECTION: We selected studies comparing infectious outcomes using maximal sterile barriers versus using less stringent sterile barrier techniques during central venous catheter insertion. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found only 3 primary research studies. Although each study suggests maximal sterile barriers may reduce infectious complications, the evidence supporting this conclusion is incomplete. The only randomized controlled trial limited enrollment to ambulatory oncology patients. These 3 studies differed notably in their patient populations, research designs, and health care settings. CONCLUSION: The medical literature suggests maximal sterile barriers are advantageous in at least one setting and may be useful in others. While we believe the available evidence does support the use of maximal sterile barriers during routine insertion of central venous catheters, prospective studies and economic analyses would better clarify its value.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Curativos Oclusivos , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos
4.
Arch Intern Med ; 164(9): 989-93, 2004 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15136308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) occur frequently in postmenopausal women and account for substantial morbidity and economic costs. Although extensively studied in younger women and older, debilitated women, the risk factors for UTI among healthy community-dwelling postmenopausal women have not been well described. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, case-control study of women aged between 55 and 75 years enrolled in a large, staff-model health maintenance organization. Cases were identified using computerized laboratory and outpatient records. Controls were randomly selected from the plan's enrollment files. We interviewed subjects regarding their habits, general health, and potential risk factors for UTI. RESULTS: We interviewed 899 study subjects and 911 controls. Sociodemographic characteristics were similar in subjects and controls. Most women were insured and white. Like younger women, postmenopausal women with current UTI were more likely to be sexually active (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.87) and have a history of UTI (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.25-5.42). Like older debilitated women, study subjects were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.78-4.35) and to be incontinent (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03-1.78). Oral estrogen replacement did not reduce UTI risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, the risk factors of healthy community-dwelling postmenopausal women reflect the health status of women as they transition toward old age. Sexual activity, history of UTI, treated diabetes, and incontinence were all associated with a higher risk of UTI. The therapeutic role of oral estrogen remains uncertain. Prospective studies in different patient populations are needed to better understand the risk factors of UTI.


Assuntos
Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pós-Menopausa , Fatores de Risco , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...