Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to reduce inflammatory pain and swelling in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with rheumatological manifestations. While these drugs effectively reduce musculoskeletal pain and stiffness, long-term use is limited by gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs) and disease exacerbation. As an alternative to NSAIDs, selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors were developed to improve GI safety and tolerability. COX-2 inhibitors include drugs such as celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, etoricoxib, and lumiracoxib. Rofecoxib and valdecoxib have been withdrawn from the market worldwide due to safety concerns (most importantly for cardiovascular adverse events) and lumiracoxib has been withdrawn in many countries due to liver toxicity. However, celecoxib and etoricoxib continue to be available for use in many countries. Several studies have examined whether COX-2 inhibitors can be safely used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of IBD with inconsistent results. Some investigators report acceptable safety profiles associated with these drugs while others found that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with high rates of disease exacerbation. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the tolerability and safety of COX-2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological manifestations of IBD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases from inception to 19 September 2013: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL. The search was not limited by language. Additional trials were identified by manually searching the reference lists of relevant papers and conference proceedings and through correspondence with experts and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared COX-2 inhibitors to placebo were considered for inclusion. Participants were adult patients with IBD presenting with rheumatological manifestations of at least two weeks duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with disease exacerbation as defined by the included studies. Secondary outcomes included GI adverse effects, renal toxicity, cardiovascular and thrombotic events. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis where patients with missing final outcomes were assumed to have had an exacerbation of IBD. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS: There were no RCTs that assessed the tolerability or safety of the withdrawn COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib, valdecoxib, or lumiracoxib. Two RCTs (n = 381 IBD patients with rheumatological manifestations) were included in the review. One study (n = 159) compared etoricoxib (60 to 120 mg/day) to placebo in IBD patients with quiescent or active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. The other study (n = 222) compared celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) to placebo in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Both studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. The two included studies were not pooled for meta-analysis due to differences in patient populations and treatment duration. There was no statistically significant difference in exacerbation of IBD between etoricoxib and placebo. After 12 weeks of treatment the IBD exacerbation rate was 17% (14/82) in the etoricoxib group compared to 19% (15/77) in the placebo group (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.69). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (29 events). There was no statistically significant difference in exacerbation of ulcerative colitis between celecoxib and placebo. After two weeks of treatment 4% (5/112) of celecoxib patients experienced an exacerbation of ulcerative colitis compared to 6% (7/110) of patients in the placebo group (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.14). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (12 events). The study comparing etoricoxib to placebo documented but did not report on AEs. The proportion of patients who experienced AEs was similar in the celecoxib and placebo groups (21% and 17%, respectively, P > 0.20). No patients in either group died or experienced serious adverse events. Eleven percent of patients in the celecoxib and placebo groups experienced GI AEs (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.07). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (24 events). GI AEs led to premature withdrawal from the study in 3% of patients in celecoxib and placebo groups respectively. GI AEs included increased stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and inflamed mucosa. No patients experienced any cardiovascular adverse events. Renal toxicity or thrombotic AEs were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results for disease exacerbation and AEs between the COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and etoricoxib and placebo were uncertain. Thus no definitive conclusions regarding the tolerability and safety of the short term use of celecoxib and etoricoxib in patients with IBD can be drawn. The two included studies suggest that celecoxib and etoricoxib do not exacerbate IBD symptoms. However, it should be noted that both studies had relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up durations. Clinicians need to continue to weigh the risks and benefits of these drugs when treating patients IBD patients with rheumatological manifestations in order to avoid disease exacerbation and other adverse effects. Further RCTs are needed to determine the tolerability and safety of celecoxib and etoricoxib in these patients.

[Analysis of surgical treatment for severe ulcerative colitis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of different procedures in the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring colectomy. METHODS: A total of 29 UC inpatients who underwent colectomy at the West China Hospital between January 1996 and December 2008 were included in this study. Except two cases who underwent partial colectomy, patients were divided into total colectomy group (TC group, n=7) and total proctocolectomy group (TPC group, n=20), meanwhile divided into ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA, n=8) group, straight end-to-end anastomosis (ileoanal or ileorectal and ileostomy) group (n=14)and ileostomy group (n=5). Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) instrument. RESULTS: The complication rate was 60.0% in TPC group and 57.1% in TC group (P>0.05). The recurrence rate was 15.0% in TPC group and 57.1% in TC group (P<0.05). The complication rate was 6/8 in IPAA group and 50.0% (7/14) in straight end-to-end anastomosis group (P>0.05). The frequency of daily bowel movements in IPAA group was significantly lower than that in straight end-to-end anastomosis group at 1 year after the surgery (5.6+/-1.7 versus 9.1+/-2.9, P<0.05). QOL was significantly improved postoperatively for all the patients(P<0.01). Patients who underwent IPAA had a better QOL than those of straight end-to-end anastomosis group (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TPC-IPAA is the ideal procedure of severe UC with acceptable complication rate, satisfactory quality of life and functional outcome.

Progression of inflammatory bowel disease in China.

The epidemiology and phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the Chinese population is not well-known. We performed a comprehensive search of the Chinese biomedical literature database from 1989 to 2007 using the following key words: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD). The investigation of hospitalized IBD patients from 1990 to 2003 was also carried out in 23 medical centers of 11 cities over China. There are some notable epidemiological and phenotypical differences between Chinese IBD and Caucasian IBD, including a lack of familial clustering, male predominance, a relatively later onset of the illness with no second peak age occurrence after 50 years old, a milder clinical course, less extra-intestinal manifestations and complications, and less fistulous and peri-anal complications in Chinese CD. The data indicate an increased incidence of IBD in China with many complicated clinical problems, which offers potential opportunities to study the disease prospectively and identify the etiological factors, leading also to the better management of this disease in China.

Basic research on inflammatory bowel disease in China.

OBJECTIVE: Since the etiology and the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are still not well known, research on IBD often focuses on these topics. Investigative science papers about IBD in Chinese medical journals from 1989 to 2003 were viewed to understand the progress of basic IBD research in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The basic science investigative papers about IBD from 1989 to 2003 in Chinese periodicals (VIP and CMCC) were reviewed and analyzed; the key words used were as follows: inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, basic science investigation, and literature review. RESULTS: There were 3454 articles about IBD published in Chinese medical journals from 1989 to 2003, and during these 15 years, 508 papers focused on basic scientific investigations. There were 463 papers investigating the pathogenesis of IBD, 287 papers on immunological mechanisms, and 176 papers about other mechanisms. There were 142 papers investigating the mechanisms of Chinese traditional medicine on IBD from 1989 to 2003, which included 117 papers related to animal experiments and 25 papers related to clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: There have been relatively few investigative scientific papers on IBD published in Chinese medical journals. However, the study of IBD has been emphasized in China. Research on the immunological mechanisms of IBD has been predominant. Furthermore, a large number of the research papers were about the mechanisms and effects of Chinese traditional medicine on IBD.

Diallyl trisulfide inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression in inflammed mucosa of ulcerative colitis.

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of diallyl trisulfide (DATS) on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha expression in inflammed mucosa of ulcerative colitis and its possible mechanism. Colonic biopsies from ulcerative colitis were treated with 0, 1, 5, and 10 microM DATS for 24 hr. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activities and concentrations of TNF-alpha in supernatants were measured. mRNA expressions of TNF-alpha in biopsies were analyzed by RT-PCR. The expression of NF-kappaB P65 in tissues was studied by immunohistochemistry. Concentrations of TNF-alpha in supernatants of biopsies treated with 5 and 10 microM DATS were lower than those of untreated biopsies. There were fewer lamina propria mononuclear cells whose NF-kappaB P65 expression in nuclei was positive, and less mRNA expression of TNF-alpha in biopsies treated with 10 microM DATS than in untreated biopsies. There were no differences in LDH activities in supernatants between tissues treated with DATS and untreated tissues. DATS could downregulate TNF-alpha production and inhibit NF-kappaB activation in lamina propria mononuclear cells of inflammed mucosa, without any effect on the viability of colonic tissue cells.