Biomechanical evaluation of a central collinear entry reconstruction nail for femoral neck fracture prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Reconstruction nails are commonly used to treat proximal femur fractures, with cephalic screw placement for femoral neck "prophylaxis" becoming standard practice. These implants are traditionally introduced through piriformis fossa (PF) or greater trochanter (GT) entry portals. A third "central collinear" (CC) portal has been proposed that allows entry along the femoral anatomic axis and central placement of cephalic screws. The present study aimed to quantify and compare the CC portal femoral neck strength with the two traditional (PF and GT) entry portals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric femur specimens (nine matched pairs) were divided into three groups using a balanced incomplete block design to control for variations in age and sex: (1) GT, (2) CC, and (3) PF entry points. Specimens and implants were cut to a standard length and instrumented with straight or valgus bend nails of appropriate laterality and two cephalic screws. Specimens were mounted on a custom jig replicating load distribution along the mechanical axis. A 100 N compressive preload was applied to the femoral head, followed by loading to failure at a rate of 10 mm/s until fracture, indicated by 30 % drop in axial force. RESULTS: THE THREE ENTRY POINTS DID NOT DIFFER IN LOAD-TO-FAILURE: GT (6378.7 ± 1494.9 N), P (6912.4 ± 4924.1 N) and CC (7044.2 ± 2911.4 N) (P = 0.948) or maximum displacement, stiffness, and toughness. Most PF specimens failed at the basicervical neck, whereas most GT specimens failed at the subcapital neck; these differences were not significant. CC specimens failed evenly split between subcapital and basicervical. CONCLUSION: There were no significant difference in femoral neck load-to-failure after placement of a reconstruction nail through a CC entry portal when compared to both GT and PF entry. Clinically, this suggests the CC entry portal is a viable option when clinical considerations warrant its use.

Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Between Palmaris Longus Autograft and Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Allograft.

Background: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injury can cause significant pain and alter throwing mechanics. Common autograft options for mUCL reconstruction (UCLR) include the palmaris longus (PL) and hamstring tendons. Allograft use may reduce donor site morbidity and decrease function related to PL autografts. Purpose: To compare varus stability and load to failure between a novel allograft for UCLR-knee medial collateral ligament (kMCL)-and a PL autograft in human donor elbow specimens. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 24 fresh-frozen human elbows were dissected to expose the mUCL. Medial elbow stability was tested with the mUCL intact (native), deficient, and reconstructed utilizing the humeral single-docking technique with either a (1) kMCL allograft (n = 12) or (2) a PL autograft (n = 12). A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion tracking cameras. The elbow was cycled through a full range of motion 5 times. After kinematic testing, specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion, and failure modes were recorded. Results: The mUCL-deficient elbows demonstrated significantly greater valgus rotation compared with the intact and reconstructed elbows at every flexion angle tested (10°-120°) (P <.001). Both kMCL- and PL-reconstructed elbows exhibited significantly higher mean valgus rotation compared with the intact state between 10° and 40° of flexion (P < .01). There were no significant differences in valgus rotation at any flexion angle between the kMCL and PL graft groups. When loaded to failure, elbows reconstructed with both kMCL and PL grafts failed at similar torque values (18.6 ± 4 and 18.1 ± 3.4 N·m, respectively; P = .765). Conclusion: Fresh-frozen and aseptically processed kMCL allografts demonstrated similar kinematic and failure properties to PL tendon autografts in UCL-reconstructed elbows, although neither graft fully restored kinematics between 10° and 40°. Clinical Relevance: Prepared kMCL ligament allografts may provide a viable graft material when reconstructing elbow ligaments while avoiding the potential complications related to PL autografts- including donor site morbidity.

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Augmentation Enhances the Mechanical Characteristics of Midfoot Beam Constructs in Charcot Neuroarthropathy Cadaver Model.

BACKGROUND: Even with the best conservative care, patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) of the foot and ankle often ulcerate, increasing their risk of infection, amputation, and death. Surgical fixation has been associated with risk of recurrent ulceration, potentially due to poor bone quality prone to recurrent deformity and ulceration. We propose midfoot beam reconstruction with PMMA augmentation as a novel means of improving fixation. METHODS: A protocol was developed to create characteristic CN midfoot fragmentation both visually and fluoroscopically in each of 12 matched-pair cadaveric feet. Afterward, the pairs were divided into 2 groups: (1) midfoot beam fusion surgery alone, and (2) midfoot beam fusion surgery augmented with PMMA. A solid 7.0-mm beam was placed into the medial column and a solid 5.5-mm beam was placed across the lateral column. In the PMMA group, 8 to 10 mL of PMMA was inserted into the medial column. The hindfoot of each specimen was potted and the metatarsal heads were cyclically loaded for 1800 cycles, followed by load to failure while load and displacement were continually recorded. RESULTS: One specimen in the beam alone group failed before reaching the 1800th cycle and was not included in the failure analysis. The midfoot beam only group demonstrated greater mean displacement during cycle testing compared with the PMMA group, P < .05. The maximum force (N), stiffness (N/mm), and toughness (Nmm) were all significantly greater in the group augmented with PMMA, P < .05. CONCLUSION: In a CN cadaveric model, PMMA augmentation significantly decreased gapping during cyclic loading and nearly doubled the load to failure compared with midfoot beams alone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this biomechanical study demonstrate that augmentation of midfoot beams with PMMA increases the strength and stiffness of the fusion construct. This increased mechanical toughness may help reduce the risk of nonunion and infection in patients with neuropathic midfoot collapse.