RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Systematic prostate biopsy has limitations, such as overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer and underdiagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy, a promising alternative, might improve diagnostic accuracy. To compare the cancer detection rates of systematic biopsy and combined biopsy (systematic biopsy plus MRI-targeted biopsy) in Asian men, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of men who underwent either systematic biopsy or combined biopsy at two medical centers (Queen Mary Hospital and Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China) from July 2015 to December 2022. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. The primary and secondary outcomes were prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. A total of 1391 participants were enrolled. The overall prostate cancer detection rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (36.3% vs 36.6%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.26, P = 0.92). However, combined biopsy showed a significant advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 3+4) in patients with a total serum prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) concentration of 2-10 ng ml-1 (systematic vs combined: 11.9% vs 17.5%, OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.08-2.31, P = 0.02). Specifically, in the transperineal biopsy subgroup, combined biopsy significantly outperformed systematic biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (systematic vs combined: 12.6% vs 24.0%, OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.21-3.97, P = 0.01). These findings suggest that in patients with a tPSA concentration of 2-10 ng ml-1, MRI-targeted biopsy may be of greater predictive value than systematic biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conventional lung function parameters, such as forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and inspiratory capacity (IC) are often used to assess the therapeutic outcomes of bronchodilators, but they lack sensitivity. A novel indicator, namely efficiency of neural respiratory drive (NRD), may objectively evaluate the physiological changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated whether this indicator could be used to more accurately assess the responsiveness to inhaled bronchodilators. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized into group A (n=18) and group B (n=18). Participants in group A inhaled 400 µg placebo, 400 µg salbutamol and 80 µg ipratropium in sequence whereas those in group B had the salbutamol and ipratropium reversed. At different time points after administration of placebo or bronchodilators, evaluated indices included FEV1, FVC, IC, root mean square (RMS) of diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi), and efficiency of NRD [herein defined as the ratio of minute ventilation (VE) to RMS, or VE/RMS]. RESULTS: FEV1, FVC, IC, RMS, and VE/RMS significantly improved after inhaled bronchodilators and VE/RMS had the largest improvement among five indices. The detection efficiency of VE/RMS was greater than FEV1, FVC, IC (all P<0.05), but not different from RMS. The accuracy and sensitivity of VE/RMS were significantly higher than FEV1, FVC, IC, and RMS (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Efficiency of NRD may be a sensitive tool to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled bronchodilators in COPD.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of inhaled short-acting bronchodilators on diaphragm function and neural respiratory drive in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during maximal isocapnic ventilation (MIV). METHODS: Forty-seven patient with moderate to severe COPD were randomized into 4 groups: placebo group (n=12), salbutamol group (n=13), ipratropium group (n=10), and combined group (salbutamol and ipratropium, n=12). Each subject received an initial MIV for 3 min at baseline and inhaled placebo (400 µg), salbutamol (400 µg), ipratropium (80 µg), or both salbutamol and ipratropium, followed 30 min later by another 3 min of MIV. The parameters of diaphragm function and neural respiratory drive were monitored continuously and calculated during MIV. RESULTS: During the initial MIV, all the patients experienced a linear increase in root mean square (RMS) of diaphragm electromyogram with a gradual decrease in transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), minute ventilation (VE), and VE/RMS, and these parameters all improved significantly after inhalation of the bronchodilators. Compared with the placebo group at the same time point, the 3 bronchodilator-treated groups showed significantly decreased RMS and Borg score and increased Pdi, VE and VE/RMS; VE/RMS was the highest in the combined treatment group (P<0.05). The Delta Borg was significantly correlated with Delta Pdi, Delta VE, Delta RMS, and Delta VE/RMS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients, inhaled short-acting bronchodilators can alleviate diaphragm fatigue during MIV, increase lung ventilation, reduce neural respiratory drive, and improve neuro-ventilatory coupling to relieve dyspnoea, and the combination of ß-2 agonists and anti-muscarinic antagonists produces a stronger efficacy.
