Risk of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome among selective alpha-1 blockers-A consistency model of 6,488 cases.

Selective α1-blockers are commonly administered to patients with lower urinary tract syndrome and benign prostatic hyperplasia, but may increase the risk of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS). The purpose of this study aimed to clarify the risk of IFIS among various selective α1-blockers. Four databases were searched for prospective studies comparing alpha-1-antagonists. Data were pooled using the consistency model, and used risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for IFIS and pupil diameter, respectively. This study finally included 25 prospective comparative studies. Based on 51 direct comparisons with 6488 cases, risks of IFIS in patients who received tamsulosin [RR, 13.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.34 to 26.11], terazosin (RR, 8.94; 95% CI 2.88 to 27.74), alfuzosin (RR, 7.73; 95% CI: 3.05 to 19.62), and doxazosin (RR, 3.88; 95% CI: 1.13 to 13.28) were significantly higher than those did not receive α1-antagonists. Based on 11 direct comparisons with 564 cases, as compared to no α1-antagonists, patients who received tamsulosin (MD, -0.36; 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.01) and alfuzosin (MD, -0.34; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.07) showed smaller pupil diameter under mesopic light levels, while those received silodosin did not show significantly smaller mesopic pupil diameter than people without α1-antagonists. IFIS seems to be inevitable with the usage of α1-antagonists, and tamsulosin needs to be cautious due to the significantly higher risk of severe IFIS. With regard to silodosin, there is no strong evidence to support the uses of italthough it does not significantly decrease mesopic pupil diameter.

Heterotopic ossification with concurrent chronic osteomyelitis of the leg following licking of a wound by a domesticated dog.

INTRODUCTION: HO with concurrent chronic osteomyelitis is extremely rare. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case in the English-language literature with wound infection and mature HO with chronic osteomyelitis caused by mixed infection of Pasteurella canis, Peptoniphilus coxii, Peptostreptococcus canis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum following licking of a wound by a domesticated dog. CASE REPORT: A 49-year-old female with a painful, swollen, and purulent wound with bone exposure, measuring 2.5 cm × 1.5 cm, on the right leg was referred after an unsuccessful 3-month treatment regimen for an open wound resulting from a motorcycle accident. The patient's dog licked the wound several times 1 week after the accident. Sequestrectomy and debridement were performed after a 3-week OPD treatment. Postoperative treatment included NPWT applied for 6 days, 1 week of open wound care, STSG 2 weeks after the first operation, and IV antibiotics for 3 weeks. Pathologic examination was positive for HO with chronic osteomyelitis. The patient was discharged 3 weeks after admission under stable condition followed by OPD treatment. Wound healing was achieved 2 months after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated licking of the patient's wound by her dog caused the colonization of pathogens from the dog's saliva, and inappropriate wound care by the patient herself resulted in HO with chronic osteomyelitis, which was successfully treated with a regimen of NPWT, open wound care, STSG, and IV antibiotics.

Liquid combination of hyaluronan, glucosamine, and chondroitin as a dietary supplement for knee osteoarthritis patients with moderate knee pain: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronan (HA), glucosamine, and chondroitin sulfate are widely consumed as dietary supplements for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of a dietary liquid supplement mixture containing HA, glucosamine, and chondroitin in patients with knee OA who had moderate knee pain (visual analogue scale of 4-6 points). METHODS: This was a short-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects were allocated to administer either a bottle of 20 mL supplement mixture (50 mg HA plus 750 mg glucosamine plus 250 mg chondroitin, namely A + HA) or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36), Chinese version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and incidence of adverse event were evaluated at the end of week 8. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the modified intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of the 80 subjects in the modified intent-to-treat population, 39 received A + HA while 41 received placebo. After 8 weeks of treatment, the A + HA group failed to demonstrate a significant symptomatic efficacy and quality of life improvement in terms of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, SF-36, and Chinese version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index as compared to the placebo group. However, the mean changes in most of the SF-36 scale scores were numerically higher in the A + HA group than in the placebo group. No treatment-related adverse event was reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This present study found that the combination of liquid low molecular weight HA, glucosamine, and chondroitin oral supplement did not effectively improve knee OA pain and symptoms after short-term use in knee OA patients with moderate knee pain. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the intrinsic limitation of the study design.

The effect of oral low molecular weight liquid hyaluronic acid combination with glucosamine and chondroitin on knee osteoarthritis patients with mild knee pain: An 8-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of dietary supplements for knee osteoarthritis (OA) management is on the rise; however, their effects are still debated. METHODS: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an oral low molecular weight liquid hyaluronic acid supplement in the treatment of knee OA patients with mild knee pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] ≤ 3) in Taiwan population. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Forty-seven subjects were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the A+HA or the placebo groups. The subjects were required to drink a bottle contained 20 mL of A+HA or placebo daily throughout an 8-week study period. The efficacy was assessed by using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: At Week 8, significant reductions from baseline in the WOMAC pain (-2.6 ±â€Š1.68, P < .0001), stiffness (-1.2 ±â€Š1.50, P = .007), physical function (-5.8 ±â€Š4.39, P < .0001), and total (-9.4 ±â€Š5.82, P < .0001) scores were observed in the A+HA group but not in the placebo group. Significant differences in the mean change of WOMAC scores from baseline at Week 8 between groups were detected (P < .01). At Week 8, the A+HA group also showed significant improvements in SF-36 physical functioning (2.7 ±â€Š3.10, P = .001) and bodily pain (0.7 ±â€Š1.50, P < .05) domains. Although the A+HA group had a higher increase in the SF-36 total score than the placebo group but the difference was not statistically significant (2.1 ±â€Š12.75 vs 0.3 ±â€Š19.66, P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of low molecular weight liquid HA appeared to be effective for knee OA patients with mild knee pain (VAS ≤ 3) in the relief of knee OA symptoms, particularly in pain and physical function.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04352322.

Clinicopathological Presentation and Management of Penile Schwannoma.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with penile schwannoma are rare and usually with variant presentations. No evidence-based clinical guideline exists for diagnosis or treatment. To put schwannoma into differential diagnoses of benign soft tissue lesions in the penis is important. AIM: To analyze and categorize clinical, histopathological, and radiological presentations and apply possible explanation on several fields of penile schwannoma. METHODS: We collected the English literature through the PubMed database of the National Library of Medicine up to October 2019. A newly diagnosed case in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, was also included. This study categorized lesion locations into the penile body or shaft, glans, or penile root, dorsal or ventral. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was to demonstrate clinical, pathological, ultrasonography, and MRI manifestations of penile schwannoma and perform immunohistochemistry staining that has not been performed among penile schwannomas. RESULTS: We collected 40 cases. Data were arranged in tables. Clear descriptions were added on several fields of penile schwannoma in detail in Discussion. CONCLUSION: Penile schwannomas are mostly located at the penile shaft and dorsum of the penis. Dyspareunia is the most reported complaint for sexual dysfunction. This study is the first study in the world to document the expressions of calretinin, SOX10, glial fibrillary acid protein, D2-40 (podoplanin), and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 in penile schwannoma and claims magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic presentations of penile schwannomas are synonymous with schwannomas from head to toe. The current patient may be the first to present with penile schwannoma with schwannomatosis. Huang LC, Wang HZ, Chu YC, et al. Clinicopathological Presentation and Management of Penile Schwannoma. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:615-621.