RESUMO
PURPOSE: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting widespread vaccination, many related neurological disorders, including autoimmune encephalopathy, have emerged. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying the COVID-19 vaccination and autoimmune encephalopathy remains unclear; more case reports and further investigation are required. CASE REPORT: We report a clinical case of a 38-year-old woman who presented with acute-onset amnesia, language disturbance, and seizure. We suspected autoimmune encephalopathy triggered by the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a subacute infarction at the right internal capsule and irregular vascular contour, which indicated a vasculopathy, such as vasculitis. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed inflammation without pleocytosis, and electroencephalography detected diffuse background slowing with sharp transients at the right temporal region. Although autoantibody tests were negative, we initiated steroid pulse therapy. The patient's symptoms improved rapidly. The patient was discharged without neurological deficit or sequelae. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be mindful of postvaccinal encephalopathy and suspect this condition in patients with acute onset of psychosis or mental change, higher cortical dysfunction, and seizure within 2 weeks of vaccination. Early diagnosis is key, and immune treatment, such as steroid pulse therapy or immunosuppressants, may dramatically improve patients'symptoms.
RESUMO
Objectives: To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of scalp acupuncture (SA) in patients with stroke and consequent hemiparesis regardless of brain infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: A literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SA for stroke was performed in five databases up to May 10, 2021. We investigated three types of outcome: motor function, sequelae of poststroke hemiparesis, and adverse effects. Methodological quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0. Results: Of 1,063 papers, 30 RCTs involving Fugl-Meyer Assessment were selected, among which 10 and four RCTs were selected for evaluation of courses lasting of 1 and 3 months, respectively. The meta-analysis of 1- and 3-month courses revealed significant differences in the motor function of the SA plus Western standard treatment group vs. Western standard treatment only (medication plus rehabilitation; P < 0.001). A 3-month course tended to result in better outcomes than a 1-month course. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis results reveal that SA improves motor function in patients with acute to chronic stroke, regardless of brain infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage. However, because of a lack of methodological quality, thoroughly planned clinical studies are still required.
