Simplified Chinese version of the PROMIS Pediatric-25 profile: A validation study among cancer children.

PURPOSE: Pediatric cancer is a significant health concern in China, and evaluating the impact of cancer and its treatment on the well-being of young patients is essential for both clinical care and research purposes. This study aimed to psychometrically validate the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric-25 Profile (PROMIS-Pediatric-25) among Chinese children with cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: We enrolled a group of 114 children living with cancer between the ages of 8 and 17. Each participant completed questionnaires that covered sociodemographic and clinical information and the PROMIS-Pediatric-25. The floor and ceiling effect was examined. Cronbach's alpha and split-half coefficient were examined to determine the reliability. Factor structure was explored by factor analysis. Three assumptions of Rasch model-based item response theory (IRT) were assessed. Differential item functioning (DIF) was investigated concerning factors of gender, diagnosis, and treatment stage. RESULTS: The floor or ceiling effects were detected for six domains. The reliability was found to be excellent. Furthermore, the factor structure of these six domains was validated. Our analysis confirmed that the assumptions required for IRT were met with acceptable unidimensionality, local independence, and good monotonicity. Additionally, we observed measurement equivalence, with outstanding levels of DIF across factors such as gender, diagnosis, and treatment stage. CONCLUSION: PROMIS-Pediatric 25 is a highly reliable and valid instrument for evaluating key domains of health-related quality of life in Chinese pediatric cancer patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Nursing practice could engage the PROMIS-Pediatric 25 for accurate and quick children symptom and function assessment.

Validation of the simplified Chinese version of PROMIS Parent Proxy-25 Profile in parents of children with cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the psychometric properties of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Parent Proxy-25 Profile (PROMIS-25) in a sample of Chinese parents of children with cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional sample (N = 148) of parents with children aged 5-17 years living with cancer was recruited. Each participant completed sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires and PROMIS-25. The flooring and ceiling effects were calculated. Reliability was determined by the Cronbach's alpha and split-half coefficient. Factor structure was examined by factor analysis. Model fit and graphical plots were assessed to test the assumptions of Rasch model-based item response theory (IRT). Differential item functioning (DIF) was assessed in terms of gender, age, and treatment stage. RESULTS: PROMIS-25 demonstrated some flooring and ceiling effect, excellent reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7 for all six domains), and the six-domain factor structure was supported. The IRT assumptions were met in terms of unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and measurement equivalence with acceptable DIF in terms of gender, age, diagnosis, and treatment stage. CONCLUSION: PROMIS-25 is a highly reliable and valid instrument for evaluating children with cancer that assesses important health-related quality of life domains of child cancer. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Chinese parents of children with cancer and healthcare providers could use PROMIS-25 to assess the symptoms of children.

Symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer: An integrative review.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to synthesize the available knowledge of symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer and identify predictors associated with these trajectories. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method was employed to guide a systematic search for literature in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). The retrieved articles' publication time was limited to 2010 to 2020, and only peer-reviewed English articles were included. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were included. The findings of the relevant studies were analyzed using thematic analysis. They were grouped into two themes: symptom trajectories of patients with breast cancer (symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer, in patients who underwent surgery, and in patients who received cancer-related treatment) and associated factors (socioeconomic factors, health characteristics, cancer-related treatment characteristics). Newly diagnosed patients tended to report high trajectories of depression and persistent sleep disturbance. Most patients who underwent surgery reported significant sleep disturbance and anxiety shortly after surgery. For patients who received cancer-related treatment, only a small proportion had a high level of physical activity after cancer-related therapy over time. A high body mass index, a low relationship quality, parental responsibilities, insufficient social support, a low educational background, and an unhealthy lifestyle may increase the risk of negative symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer. Additionally, old patients were more likely to report cognitive impairment after chemotherapy, while young patients tended to report trajectories of persistent sexual dysfunction. Concurring symptoms and poor health status also contributed to adverse symptom trajectories. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review add to the body of knowledge of the interindividual variability of symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer. Despite the overall similarity in appraisal at baseline, the patients reported varied symptom trajectories over time. It is recommended that nurses consider sociodemographic, clinical and cancer-related treatment characteristics and perform targeted early preventive interventions for patients with breast cancer.

Mobile health applications for the care of patients with breast cancer: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, the use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) to deliver care for patients with breast cancer has increased exponentially. This study aimed to summarize the available evidence on developing mHealth apps to care for patients with breast cancer and identify the need for systematic efforts. METHODS: A scoping review was performed according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework, aiming to identify eligible research studies in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science between January 2010 and December 2020. All identified studies were screened, extracted, and analyzed independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 676 studies were retrieved, and eight eligible studies were finally included. Four themes emerged: the involvement of patients and health professionals in the phases of design and development, patients' preferences, the characteristics of patients, and the motivators to use mHealth apps. The results indicated promising prospects for using mHealth apps to care for patients with breast cancer and identified the need for systematic efforts to develop and validate relevant apps. CONCLUSIONS: The attributes of patient characteristics, needs, and patient-reported outcomes data are vital components for developing mHealth apps for patients with breast cancer. Additionally, collaborative efforts, including patients, nurses, and other significant health professionals, should develop mHealth apps for breast cancer care. Additional research focusing on the design and development of mHealth apps for patients with breast cancer is warranted.