RESUMO
Objective To compare the clinical efficacies of transanal total mesorectal excision(TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME)for rectal cancer (RC).Methods The case-control matching method and retrospective cohort study were conducted.The clinicopathological data of 100 RC patients who were admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between July 2014 and January 2016 were collected.Of 100 patients,50 undergoing TaTME and 50 undergoing LapTME were respectively allocated into the TaTME and LapTME groups by case-control matching method.Observation indicators:(1) operation situations:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,cases with intraoperative complications and preventive stoma;(2) postoperative recovery:time for diet intake,time for out-of-bed activity,occurrence of complications within 30 days postoperatively and duration of hospital stay;(3) postoperative pathological examinations:postoperative pathological specimen length,number of lymph node harvest,distance from lower boundary of tumor to distant margin and cases with positive circumferential margin;(4) follow-up.Follow-up using outpatient examination and network tracing was performed to detect local tumor recurrence and distant metastasis up to December 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the paired-samples t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range).Comparisons of count data were analyzed using the chi-square test.Comparisons of measurement data with skewed distribution and ranked data were done by the nonparametric test.Results (1) Operation situations:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,cases with intraoperative complications and preventive stoma were (259±111)minutes,100 mL (range,20-2 000 mL),2,28 in the TaTME group and (220± 80)minutes,50 mL (range,20-1 000 mL),1,33 in the LapTME group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (t=1.90,Z=-0.30,x2 =0.34,0.01,P＞0.05).(2) Postoperative recovery:time for diet intake and time for out-of-bed activity were (1.6±0.5) days,(2.6±0.6) days in the TaTME group and (2.4±0.5)days,(3.5 ±0.6)days in the LapTME group,respectively,with statistically significant differences (t =8.90,11.30,P＜0.05).Cases with anastomotic fistula,bleeding and stenosis,intestinal obstruction,abdominal abscess and wound infection within 30 days postoperatively were 6,1,1,0,1,0 in the TaTME group and 5,1,2,2,1,2 in the LapTME group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (x2=0.10,0.00,0.30,2.00,0.00,2.00,P＞0.05).Cases with urinary retention within 30 days postoperatively were 3 and 0 in the TaTME and LapTME groups,respectively,with a statistically significant difference (x2 =3.00,P＜0.05).Two and 2 patients with anastomic fistula underwent reoperation in the TaTME and LapTME groups respectively,and other patients were improved by symptomatic treatment.Duration of hospital stay was 7 days (range,5-36 days)and 8 days (range,6-29 days) in the TaTME and LapTME groups,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (Z =-0.90,P ＞ 0.05).(3) Postoperative pathological examinations:postoperative pathological specimen length,number of lymph node harvest,distance from lower boundary of tumor to distant margin and cases with positive circumferential margin were (11±3)cm,13±5,(1.3±0.7)cm,0 in the TaTME group and (12±3) cm,13±5,(1.3±0.7)cm,1 in the LapTME group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (t=0.50,0.20,0.10,x2=1.00,P＞0.05).(4) Follow-up:100 patients were followed up for 9-27 months,with an average time of 18 months.During the follow-up,distant metastasis and local tumor recurrence were detected in 2,3 patients of TaTME group and in 2,2 patients of LapTME group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (x2 =0.00,0.20,P＞0.05).Conclusions TaTME for RC is safe and feasible.Compared with LapTME,TaTME not only achieves identical pathological quality without increasing intra-and postoperative complications,but also benefits postoperative recovery of patients.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach for laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer.Methods The retrospective and descriptive study was performed.The clinical data of 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer through unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach at the Sixth Mfiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2015 to March 2016 were collected.Tumor-free principle was followed and unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach was conducted.Observation indicators included:(1) surgical situations:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,(2) postoperative recovery:time to initial anal exsufflation,time of draining tube removal,postoperative complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay,(3) postoperative pathological examination:number of lymph node dissection,number of positive lymph node,length of specimen,incision margin,tumor pathological staging and type,(4) follow-up.All the patients were followed up using outpatient examination and telephone interview up to June 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as x ± s and measurement data with skewed distribution were presented as average (range).Results (1) Surgical situations:37 patients received successful operation,without conversion to open surgery and perioperative death.Operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss in 37 patients were (170 ± 50)minutes and 50 mL (range,20-300 mL).(2) Postoperative recovery:time to initial anal exsufflation,time of draining tube removal and average duration of postoperative hospital stay were (3.5 ± 1.0) days,(4.3 ± 1.1) days and 10 days (range,6-21 days),respectively.Two patients with postoperative wound liquefaction were improved by symptomatic treatment,and the other patients had no complication.(3) Postoperative pathological examination:number of lymph node dissection,number of positive lymph node,number of central lymph node dissection and length of specimen in 37 patients were 22 ±8,0 (range,0-6),6 ±5 and (32 ±9)cm,respectively,with negative incision margins.Postoperative tumor pathological staging showed that stage pT1,pT2,pT3 and pT4a were detected in 0,1,33 and 3 patients,and stage pN0,pN1 and pN2 in 23,12 and 2 patients,respectively.Postoperative tumor pathological type showed that 3,7,23 and 4 patients were respectively diagnosed with mucinous adenocarcinoma,high-differentiated adenocarcinoma,moderate-differentiated adeno-carcinoma and low-differentiated adenocarcinoma.(4) Follow-up:37 patients were followed up for 3-17 months with a median time of 11 months.During the follow-up,1 patient was complicated with anastomotic recurrence and 4 with distant metastases,the other 32 patients had tumor-free survival.Conclusion Unidirectional-loop caudal-medial approach for laparoscopicassisted radical resection of right colon cancer is safe and feasible,with a good short-term outcome,and it should be widely spread.
RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 60 rectal cancer patients undergoing taTME from July 2014 to April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the sequence of operation date, 60 patients were divided into four groups (A, B, C, D) with 15 cases in each group. General information and perioperative, especially the operative indexes were compared among four groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no significant differences in age, sex, preoperative staging, BMI, tumor size among four groups (all P>0.05). The distance from tumor to anal verge in A group was(6.7±2.5) cm, which was significantly different with B group (4.6±1.2) cm, C group (4.5±1.0) cm and D group (4.0±1.0) cm (P=0.000, P=0.000, P=0.001). Ratio of receiving neoadjuvant therapy was 0, 60.0%(9 cases), 26.7%(4 cases) and 26.7%(4 cases) in A, B, C, D groups respectively with significant difference (P=0.004). Ratio of receiving complete taTME was 73.3%(11/15) in A group, 26.7%(4/15) in B group, 13.3%(2/15) in C group and 26.7%(4/15) in D group, while other patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted procedures. This ratio of A group was significantly higher as compared to B, C, D groups (P=0.003). The operation time was significantly different among four groups [A group (223.0±105.2) minutes, B group (299.0±131.0) minutes, C group(278.0±44.8) minutes, D group (246.0±34.0) min, P=0.035]. Fluctuation of operation time was more common in A and B groups, which became stable in C and D groups. Though intra-operative blood loss was not significantly different among four groups [A group (249.0±559.6) ml, B group (288.0±568.1) ml, C group (87.0±43.3) ml, D group (69.0±64.5) ml, P=0.225], but it presented a decline trend in C and D groups. Number of harvested lymph node from postoperative pathological specimen was 10.9±5.9 in A group, 9.6±2.7 in B group, 15.8±4.8 in C group, and 14.2±5.1 in D group, with significant difference among groups (P=0.008; A group vs. C group, P=0.010; B group vs. C group, P=0.002; B group vs. D group, P=0.021). There were no significant differences in specimen length, postoperative complication rate, distal margin distance and hospital stay.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>A well-skilled laparoscopic colorectal surgeon, by following the standard surgical procedures, are likely to overcome the learning curve smoothly after performing approximately 30 cases of taTME for rectal cancer.</p>
