Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transplant ; 35(6): e14314, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33838071

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our pediatric heart transplant center transitioned from post-bypass basiliximab (BAS) induction to either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or pre-bypass BAS. The purpose of this study was to compare first-year rejection rates before and after this change. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of pediatric heart transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcome was first-year rejection. Bivariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariable regression were performed across eras. RESULTS: Forty-three early era patients (55%) received post-bypass BAS, and 35 late era patients (45%) received pre-bypass BAS (n = 17) or ATG (n = 18). First-year rejection decreased in the late era (31% vs 53%, p = .05). This finding was more pronounced after excluding infants (38% vs 73%, p = .006). Late era was associated with a decreased likelihood of rejection (all cohort OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.66; infants excluded OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.61). No differences in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, donor-specific antibody, or infection were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer late era patients receiving ATG or pre-bypass BAS induction had first-year rejection compared to the early era patients receiving standard post-bypass BAS induction. This programmatic shift in induction strategy was readily achievable and potentially effective in reducing first-year rejection.


Assuntos
Soro Antilinfocitário , Transplante de Coração , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Soro Antilinfocitário/uso terapêutico , Basiliximab , Criança , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(4): e13979, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33522702

RESUMO

Racial disparities have been reported among pediatric patients waitlisted for and undergoing heart transplantation but have not been studied further upstream in the transplant candidate evaluation process. We retrospectively studied our single-center experience in order to investigate any potential biases in the evaluation process. Results of the heart transplant evaluation in children ≤18 years old at our institution were analyzed. Primary outcome was final disposition to waitlist or not. Race was defined by family self-identification. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed. From 2013 to 2019, 133 unique patients were referred for listing consideration. While Black patients comprised 44% of the referral population and had more markers of socioeconomic disadvantage, they comprised 43% of the patients who were listed for transplantation with no significant difference between these proportions (p = .96). Black and White patients made up a similar proportion of patients deemed too well or too ill for listing. Black patients had lower annual household income estimates and rates of household marriage. Despite identifying significant social challenges in 27 patients (18 of them Black), only five patients (3 Black and 2 White) were turned down for listing due to social barriers. While limited by the small number of patients turned down for social barriers, our transplant evaluation process does not appear to result in racial disparities in access to listing. Further studies are needed using national cohorts to explore possible racial disparities upstream from waitlisting and transplantation, such as during the referral and evaluation.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Transplante de Coração , Seleção de Pacientes , Listas de Espera , Adolescente , Alabama , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 35(3): 301-305, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26657281

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary blood flow during Stage 1 (Norwood) palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is achieved via modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBT) or right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit (RVPA). Controversy exists regarding the differential impact of shunt type on outcome among those who require transplantation early in life. In this study we explored waitlist and post-transplant outcomes within this sub-population stratified by shunt type. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled through the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study (PHTS) database. Patients included those listed for heart transplantation at 1 of 35 participating centers, all of whom were <6 years of age and with a diagnosis of HLHS (and variants) status post Stage 1 palliation with MBT or RVPA. Standard risk factors for death were analyzed using multivariable hazards modeling. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2013, 190 patients were identified. Compared with the RVPA group (n = 111), the MBT group (n = 79) was less likely to have undergone a Glenn palliation (41% vs 73%, p < 0.001), were younger at listing (median age 1.3 vs 1.8 years, p = 0.05), had lower median weight (7.9 vs 9.4 kg, p = 0.02), and were more likely to be mechanically ventilated at listing (35% vs 22%, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in median waitlist time (1.7 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.2) or rate of transplantation (61% vs 60%, p = 1.0). Among waitlisted patients, 3-month survival was less for MBT compared with RVPA patients (74% vs 91%, p = 0.02). Patients who had not yet achieved Glenn palliation before listing had lower waitlist 3-month survival (76% vs 90%, p = 0.02). In MBT infants <1 year old, there was a trend toward improved survival in those with Glenn palliation compared to those without (100% vs 68%, p = 0.08). Early post-transplant mortality rates were similar between the RVPA and MBT groups (p = 0.4) with overall survival 84% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Among HLHS patients, the need for transplant before Glenn palliation is associated with poorer waitlist survival. Waitlist survival is poorer in the MBT group, with this difference driven by pre-Glenn MBT infants. Post-transplant outcomes were unaffected by shunt type.


Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Síndrome do Coração Esquerdo Hipoplásico/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Norwood , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Procedimentos de Norwood/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Listas de Espera
4.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 43(11): 1973-81, 2004 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15172400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the predictors for restenosis after cardiac transplantation. BACKGROUND: The role of PCI as definitive therapy for allograft coronary disease (ACD) remains contentious. METHODS: Between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2000, 62 patients (1.5 to 15.5 years after transplant) underwent 151 procedures resulting in PCIs of 219 lesions. Follow-up after PCI angiography was usually obtained at three and six months, then yearly. Repeat PCI was routinely done to lesions with >60% restenosis. RESULTS: The primary procedural success was 97%. Repeat PCI occurred in 74 of 219 lesions (34%); PCI-related mortality was 2.6% (4 of 151). The freedom from re-PCI (of same vessel site) was 75% at six months, 65% at one year, and 57% at four years. The freedom from restenosis was 95% at one month, 81% at three months, and 57% at six months. Multivariate predictors of freedom from restenosis were the use of stents, higher anti-proliferative immunosuppressant dose, and an era effect. In the setting of one-vessel disease at first PCI, the two-year freedom for ACD death or graft loss was 74%, compared with 75% for two-vessel and 27% for three-vessel disease (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing effectiveness of PCI for localized ACD, the survival after development of advanced ACD remains poor. Stents appear to increase effectiveness of PCI for ACD, but other factors in the current era contribute to improved outcomes.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Coração , Transplante Homólogo/patologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/patologia , Reestenose Coronária/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...