Cost and Utilization Outcomes in Huntsman at Home, a Novel Oncology Hospital at Home Program.

OBJECTIVES: In a real-world trial, we previously demonstrated that Huntsman at Home, a novel oncology hospital at home program, was associated with reduced health care utilization and costs. In this study, we sought to understand the impact of Huntsman at Home in specific patient subgroups defined by sex, age, area-level median income, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and current use of systemic anticancer therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study of the Huntsman Cancer Institute. Electronic Data Warehouse of patients enrolled in Huntsman at Home between August 2018 through October 2019 vs usual-care patients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 169 patients admitted to Huntsman at Home compared with 198 usual-care patients. METHODS: Five dichotomous subgroups evaluated including sex (female vs male), age (≥65 vs <65), income (≥$78,735 vs <$78,735), Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥2 vs <2), and current systemic anticancer therapy use vs no current systemic anticancer therapy. Groups were compared with patients receiving usual care. Primary outcomes included 30-day costs, hospital length of stay, unplanned hospitalizations, and emergency room visits. RESULTS: Admission to Huntsman at Home was associated with an overall reduction across all 4 health care cost and utilization outcomes. Outcomes favoring admission to Huntsman at Home achieved statistical significance (P < .05) in at least 2 of the 4 outcomes for each subgroup studied. Of the subgroups that did not achieve statistically significant benefit from Huntsman at Home admission in some outcome categories, none of these subgroups favored usual care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Admission to Huntsman at Home decreased utilization of unplanned health care and reduced costs across a wide spectrum of patient subgroups, suggesting overall consistent benefit from the service. Hospital at home models should be considered as a means by which the quality and efficiency of care can be maximized for patients with cancer.

Digoxin use is associated with pancreatic cancer risk but does not affect survival.

PURPOSE: Digoxin affects several cellular pathways involved in tumorigenesis. We sought to determine the association between digoxin use and pancreatic cancer risk and survival. METHODS: A nested case-control study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a population-representative database from the United Kingdom (UK). Cases included all individuals with incident diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Each case was matched to up to four controls using incidence density sampling based on age, sex, practice site, calendar time, and duration of follow-up. Exposure of interest was digoxin therapy before cancer diagnosis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between digoxin use and pancreatic cancer risk were estimated using conditional logistic regression. We further conducted a retrospective cohort study among pancreatic cancer cases using Cox regression model in order to evaluate the association between digoxin use and overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 4,113 cases with incident pancreatic cancer and 16,072 matched controls. The adjusted OR for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer among active digoxin users was 1.41 (95% CI 1.16-1.72). The risk did not change among active users with duration of therapy of more than 1 year (adjusted OR of 1.39, 95% CI 1.11-1.76). Digoxin was not associated with change in overall survival with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.97 (95% CI 0.81-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin use was associated with modestly increased pancreatic cancer risk but did not affect overall survival.