[Recommendations for Performing Bronchoscopy in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic - Update 12/2020]. / Empfehlungen zur Durchführung einer Bronchoskopie in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie: Update 12/2020.

The SARS-CoV-19 pandemic continues to be globally related with significant morbidity and mortality, making protective measures to prevent transmission of the virus still necessary. Healthcare employees are exposed to a higher risk of infection and this is particularly true when performing aerosol-generating procedures such as bronchoscopy.Since the publication of recommendations for performing a bronchoscopy in the times of COVID-19 more than six months ago, the risk situation has not changed significantly, but due to the considerable gain in knowledge in the meantime, an update of the recommendations was necessary.The updated recommendations include the reduction of aerosol formation, the personal protection of the people involved in the procedure, as well as measures to better organize the processes in the endoscopy suite in order to perform bronchoscopic procedures securely even in times of COVID-19.

[Recommendations for Performing Bronchoscopy in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic]. / Empfehlungen zur Durchführung einer Bronchoskopie in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie.

COVID-19, caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a new and ongoing infectious disease affecting healthcare systems worldwide. Healthcare worker are at high risk for COIVD-19 and many have been infected or even died in countries severely affected by COVID-19 like China or Italy. Bronchoscopy causes cough and aerosol production and has to be considered a significant risk for the staff to get infected. Particular recommendations should guide to prevent spreading COVID-19 and to protect healthcare worker when performing a bronchoscopy.

Lung Volume Reduction in Pulmonary Emphysema from the Radiologist's Perspective.

UNLABELLED: Pulmonary emphysema causes decrease in lung function due to irreversible dilatation of intrapulmonary air spaces, which is linked to high morbidity and mortality. Lung volume reduction (LVR) is an invasive therapeutical option for pulmonary emphysema in order to improve ventilation mechanics. LVR can be carried out by lung resection surgery or different minimally invasive endoscopical procedures. All LVR-options require mandatory preinterventional evaluation to detect hyperinflated dysfunctional lung areas as target structures for treatment. Quantitative computed tomography can determine the volume percentage of emphysematous lung and its topographical distribution based on the lung's radiodensity. Modern techniques allow for lobebased quantification that facilitates treatment planning. Clinical tests still play the most important role in post-interventional therapy monitoring, but CT is crucial in the detection of postoperative complications and foreshadows the method's high potential in sophisticated experimental studies. Within the last ten years, LVR with endobronchial valves has become an extensively researched minimally-invasive treatment option. However, this therapy is considerably complicated by the frequent occurrence of functional interlobar shunts. The presence of "collateral ventilation" has to be ruled out prior to valve implantations, as the presence of these extraanatomical connections between different lobes may jeopardize the success of therapy. Recent experimental studies evaluated the automatic detection of incomplete lobar fissures from CT scans, because they are considered to be a predictor for the existence of shunts. To date, these methods are yet to show acceptable results. KEY POINTS: Today, surgical and various minimal invasive methods of lung volume reduction are in use. Radiological and nuclear medical examinations are helpful in the evaluation of an appropriate lung area. Imaging can detect periinterventional complications. Reduction of lung volume has not yet been conclusively proven to be effective and is a therapeutical option with little scientific evidence.

Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis: analysis of disease manifestation by region-based quantification of lung parenchyma.

PURPOSE: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is characterized by proliferation of smooth muscle tissue that causes bronchial obstruction and secondary cystic destruction of lung parenchyma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the typical distribution of cystic defects in LAM with quantitative volumetric chest computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT examinations of 20 patients with confirmed LAM were evaluated with region-based quantification of lung parenchyma. Additionally, 10 consecutive patients were identified who had recently undergone CT imaging of the lung at our institution, in which no pathologies of the lung were found, to serve as a control group. Each lung was divided into three regions (upper, middle and lower thirds) with identical number of slices. In addition, we defined a "peel" and "core" of the lung comprising the 2 cm subpleural space and the remaining inner lung area. Computerized detection of lung volume and relative emphysema was performed with the PULMO 3D software (v3.42, Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany). This software package enables the quantification of emphysematous lung parenchyma by calculating the pixel index, which is defined as the ratio of lung voxels with a density <-950HU to the total number of voxels in the lung. RESULTS: Cystic changes accounted for 0.1-39.1% of the total lung volume in patients with LAM. Disease manifestation in the central lung was significantly higher than in peripheral areas (peel median: 15.1%, core median: 20.5%; p=0.001). Lower thirds of lung parenchyma showed significantly less cystic changes than upper and middle lung areas combined (lower third: median 13.4, upper and middle thirds: median 19.0, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The distribution of cystic lesions in LAM is significantly more pronounced in the central lung compared to peripheral areas. There is a significant predominance of cystic changes in apical and intermediate lung zones compared to the lung bases.

A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: A meta-analysis of the literature for the use of FDG PET in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) was conducted to evaluate the quality of the reported studies. Overall values for the sensitivity and specificity of whole-body FDG PET and an overall FDG PET-directed percentage change in management were also determined through this analysis. METHODS: Guidelines to evaluate the articles were formulated on the basis of the U.S. medical payer source criteria for assessing studies that report information on usage of new medical technology. A metaanalysis was conducted using methodology described in the peer-reviewed literature. RESULTS: On the basis of the guidelines established for our review, the availability of necessary information for assessing the reliability of the FDG PET data for diagnosing recurrent CRC was less than ideal. Through a meta-analysis of 11 articles, we determined, within a 95% confidence level, an overall sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence level, 95%-99%) and an overall specificity of 76% (95% confidence level, 64%-88%) for FDG PET detecting recurrent CRC throughout the whole body. Furthermore, through pooling of the change-in-management data, an overall FDG PET-directed change in management was calculated to be 29% (95% confidence level, 25%-34%). CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that improvements can be made to more effectively report the results of these FDG PET studies. The overall values determined through the meta-analysis indicate the potential benefits of using FDG PET as a diagnostic or management tool. Furthermore, these values should prove to be useful to assess the cost-effectiveness of using FDG PET in the management of patients with recurrent CRC.