Area 3a: topographic organization and cortical connections in marmoset monkeys.

The functional organization of area 3a, a cortical field proposed to be involved in somato-motor-vestibular integration, has never been described for any primate. In the present investigation, the topographic organization and connections of area 3a were examined in marmosets using electrophysiological recording and anatomical tracing techniques. Multi-unit neuronal activity was recorded at a number of closely spaced sites; receptive fields (RFs) for neurons were determined, and the optimal stimulus was identified. In all cases, neurons in area 3a responded to the stimulation of deep receptors on the contralateral body. The representation of the body in area 3a was from the toes and foot, to the hindlimb, trunk, forelimb, hand and face in a mediolateral progression. In all cases electrophysiological results were related to myeloarchitecture, and the map in area 3a was found to be coextensive with a strip of lightly to moderately myelinated cortex just rostral to the darkly myelinated 3b. To examine the cortical connections of area 3a, injections of anatomical tracers were made into electrophysiologically identified body part representations. Area 3a has dense intrinsic connections and receives substantial inputs from the primary motor cortex (M1), the supplementary motor area (SMA), areas 1 and 2, the second somatosensory area (S2), and areas in posterior parietal cortex (PP). The connections of area 3a indicate that integration of cortical representations of body parts occurs both within area 3a and between area 3a and other somatosensory and motor areas. In addition, there are differential patterns of interconnections between behaviorally relevant body part representations of area 3a, such as the forelimb, compared to other body part representations (hindlimb/ trunk), especially with 'higher order' cortical fields. This suggests that 3a may be an important component in a network that generates a common frame of reference for hand and eye coordinated reaching tasks.

Thalamo-cortical connections of areas 3a and M1 in marmoset monkeys.

The present investigation is part of a broader effort to examine cortical areas that contribute to manual dexterity, reaching, and grasping. In this study we examine the thalamic connections of electrophysiologically defined regions in area 3a and architectonically defined primary motor cortex (M1). Our studies demonstrate that area 3a receives input from nuclei associated with the somatosensory system: the superior, inferior, and lateral divisions of the ventral posterior complex (VPs, VPi, and VPl, respectively). Surprisingly, area 3a receives the majority of its input from thalamic nuclei associated with the motor system, posterior division of the ventral lateral nucleus of the thalamus (VL), the mediodorsal nucleus (MD), and intralaminar nuclei including the central lateral nucleus (CL) and the centre median nucleus (CM). In addition, sparse but consistent projections to area 3a are from the anterior pulvinar (Pla). Projections from the thalamus to the cortex immediately rostral to area 3a, in the architectonically defined M1, are predominantly from VL, VA, CL, and MD. There is a conspicuous absence of inputs from the nuclei associated with processing somatic inputs (VP complex). Our results indicate that area 3a is much like a motor area, in part because of its substantial connections with motor nuclei of the thalamus and motor areas of the neocortex (Huffman et al. [2000] Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 25:1116). The indirect input from the cerebellum and basal ganglia via the ventral lateral nucleus of the thalamus supports its role in proprioception. Furthermore, the presence of input from somatosensory thalamic nuclei suggests that it plays an important role in somatosensory and motor integration.

Organization and connections of V1 in Monodelphis domestica.

We examined the internal organization and connections of the primary visual area, V1, in the South American marsupial Monodelphis domestica. Multiunit electrophysiological recording techniques were used to record from neurons at multiple sites. Receptive field location, size, progressions, and reversals were systematically examined to determine the visuotopic organization of V1 and its boundaries with adjacent visual areas. As in other mammals, a virtually complete representation of the visual hemifield was observed in V1, which was coextensive with a region of dense myelination. The vertical meridian was represented at the rostrolateral boundary of the field, the upper visual quadrant was represented caudolaterally, whereas the lower visual quadrant was represented rostromedially. Injections of fluorescent tracers into V1 revealed dense connections with cortex immediately adjacent to the rostrolateral boundary, in peristriate cortex (PS or V2). Connections were also consistently observed with a caudotemporal area (CT), entorhinal cortex (EC), and multimodal cortex (auditory/visual, A/V). These results demonstrate that M. domestica possess a highly differentiated neocortex with clear functional and architectonic cortical field boundaries, as well as discrete patterns of cortical connections. Some connections of V1 are similar to those observed in eutherian mammals, such as connections with V2 and extrastriate areas (e.g., CT), which suggests that there are general features of visual system organization that all mammals possess due to retention from a common ancestor. On the other hand, connections of V1 with EC and multimodal cortex may be a primitive feature of visual cortex that was lost in some lineages, may be a derived feature of marsupial neocortex, or may be a feature particular to mammals with small brains.

Arealization of the neocortex in mammals: genetic and epigenetic contributions to the phenotype.

The neocortex is composed of areas that are functionally, anatomically and histochemically distinct. In comparison to most other mammals, humans have an expanded neocortex, with a pronounced increase in the number of cortical areas. This expansion underlies many complex behaviors associated with human capabilities including perception, cognition, language and volitional motor responses. In the following review we consider data from comparative studies as well as from developmental studies to gain insight into the mechanisms involved in arealization, and discuss how these mechanisms may have been modified in different lineages over time to produce the remarkable degree of organizational variability observed in the neocortex of mammals. Because any phenotype is a result of the complex interactions between genotypic influences and environmental factors, we also consider environmental, or epigenetic, contributions to the organization of the neocortex.

Formation of cortical fields on a reduced cortical sheet.

Theories of both cortical field development and cortical evolution propose that thalamocortical projections play a critical role in the differentiation of cortical fields (; ). In the present study, we examined how changing the size of the immature neocortex before the establishment of thalamocortical connections affects the subsequent development and organization of the adult neocortex. This alteration in cortex is consistent with one of the most profound changes made to the mammalian neocortex throughout evolution: cortical size. Removing the caudal one-third to three-fourths of the cortical neuroepithelial sheet unilaterally at an early stage of development in marsupials resulted in normal spatial relationships between visual, somatosensory, and auditory cortical fields on the remaining cortical sheet. Injections of neuroanatomical tracers into the reduced cortex revealed in an altered distribution of thalamocortical axons; this alteration allowed the maintenance of their original anteroposterior distribution. These results demonstrate the capacity of the cortical neuroepithelium to accommodate different cortical fields at early stages of development, although the anteroposterior and mediolateral relationships between cortical fields appear to be invariant. The shifting of afferents and efferents with cortical reduction or expansion at very early stages of development may have occurred naturally in different lineages over time and may be sufficient to explain much of the phenotypic variation in cortical field number and organization in different mammals.

Organization of somatosensory cortex in three species of marsupials, Dasyurus hallucatus, Dactylopsila trivirgata, and Monodelphis domestica: neural correlates of morphological specializations.

The organization of somatosensory neocortex was investigated in three species of marsupials, the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), the striped possum (Dactylopsila trivirgata), and the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). In these species, multiunit microelectrode mapping techniques were used to determine the detailed organization of the primary somatosensory area (SI). In the striped possum and quoll, the topography of somatosensory regions rostral (R), and caudal (C) to SI were described as well. Lateral to SI, two fields were identified in the striped possum, the second somatosensory area (SII) and the parietal ventral area (PV); in the quoll, there appeared to be only one additional lateral field which we term SII/PV. Visual and auditory cortices adjacent to somatosensory cortex were also explored, but the details of organization of these regions were not ascertained. In these animals, electrophysiological recording results were related to cortical myeloarchitecture and/or cytochrome oxidase staining. In one additional species, the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata), an architectonic analysis alone was carried out, and compared with the cortical architecture and electrophysiological recording results in the other three species. We discuss our results on the internal organization of SI in relation to the morphological specializations that each animal possesses. In addition, we discuss the differences in the organization of SI, and how evolutionary processes and developmental and adult neocortical plasticity may contribute to the observed variations in SI.