Paws and Pathogens: A Multidisciplinary Approach Through Bartonella henselae Endocarditis and Hepatosplenic T-Cell Lymphoma.

Bartonella species are gram-negative coccobacilli that are globally recognized as significant pathogens causing zoonotic infections. Among Bartonella species, B. henselae, B. quintana, and B. bacilliformis are prominent pathogens causing infections in humans, often manifesting as infective endocarditis. Bartonella endocarditis can pose diagnostic challenges due to its indolent presentation and limitations of standard microbiological culture techniques to identify the organism. We report a case of a 23-year-old male, who initially presented with the manifestations of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, later diagnosed with blood culture-negative endocarditis caused by B. henselae. The patient had a complicated clinical course including pancytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, and severe aortic valve regurgitation. Despite negative blood cultures, diagnostic clues included persistent fevers and bicuspid aortic valve with abscess. High Bartonella IgG titers (>1:800) supported the diagnosis. This case underscores the importance of considering Bartonella species in patients with suspected endocarditis, particularly in those with predisposing factors and negative blood cultures. Diagnosis relies heavily on serologic assays due to low sensitivity of conventional culture methods. Treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach with antibiotics and surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. Timely recognition and management are crucial to mitigate the high mortality associated with Bartonella endocarditis, and we hope this article offers insight for clinicians.

Evaluation of Short Versus Long Courses of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.

BACKGROUND: Short courses of antibiotics (7-10 days) are effective for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI). However, prior studies have been limited to small cohorts of critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of short courses of therapy compared with longer courses in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with GN-BSI. METHODS: Propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with GN-BSI. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality or 60-day relapse. Secondary endpoints were components of the composite, 30-day relapse, cure with or without adverse drug events (ADE), and ADEs. Regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of the composite outcome. RESULTS: 225 patients were included in the propensity analysis, 145 in the long cohort and 80 in the short cohort. The primary outcome occurred in 3.8% of patients in the short group and 9.0% of patients in the long group (P = 0.24). There was no difference in 30-day mortality (3.8% vs 5.5%, P = 0.79), 60-day relapse (0% vs 3.4%, P = 0.23), or 30-day readmission (20% vs 22.8%, P = 0.76). ADEs were more common in the long group (47.2% vs 34.1%, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.04-2.9), primarily attributable to diarrhea. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In critically ill patients with GN-BSI, there were no efficacy outcome differences in patients treated with a short course of antibiotics compared with longer. However, patients in the short group were less likely to experience ADE. These findings suggest that short courses of antibiotics are effective for GN-BSI in critically ill patients.